Pages

Thursday, December 08, 2005

The Open-Minded Professor

It sounded iffy to me when I read about it yesterday, and today Michelle Malkin has quite a bit more:
Kansas University's Paul Mirecki, the controversial religious studies professor whose planned course on creationism and intelligent design was canceled after he derided Christian conservatives as "fundies," was allegedly beaten on Monday morning by two unidentified white men who he claims targeted him for his views.If Mirecki was indeed the victim of this alleged crime, it is a travesty and a shame, and the alleged assailants should be prosecuted to the fullest extent.

There is, however, another possibility: It could be a hoax. Mirecki's reticence, lack of specifics, and odd behavior are raising some doubts. Says one skeptic:

If a pickup truck was driving behind you in the early morning in a deserted rural area, and two men got out holding a large metal object, and you were still in your car, would you get out to go talk with them? ... How did those in the pickup truck find him? Were they waiting at his house? In that case Dr. Mirecki should have noticed them right away. How would they just randomly find him in the middle of the country?
Asking such questions may seem mean-spirited, but given the prevalence of staged hate crimes since the Tawana Brawley hoax two decades ago, skepticism is warranted. Just last year, an assistant visiting professor at Claremont McKenna College was sentenced to prison after she staged an anti-Semitic hate crime against herself. Earlier this year, a lesbian student at Mt. Tamalpais High School in Marin County, Calif., faked several anti-gay incidents to garner attention and sympathy.

Curiously, earlier Wednesday, Mirecki resigned the chairmanship of KU's religious studies department. (Resignation letter here.) According to Barbara Romzek, interim dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Mirecki resigned on the recommendation of his colleagues. Strange. Do they know something we don't?


You can read more about this at Wittingshire- here is their second post, compiled after Mirecki's resignation. Here is their first.

I think the links in the Wittingshire posts are well worth your time.

From this link to Telic Thoughts you will learn that Kansas U. Professor Paul Mirecki planned to teach a course on intelligent design as mythology, which apparently sparked some controversy. Provost David Shulenburger issued an official statement regretting regretted that “the course title’s reference to mythologies’ has been misconstrued”, and that it shouldn’t be taken as an “affront”. However, Professor Mirecki apparently did not get that memo. In an email he sent to the email list ironically titled: 'the Society of Open-Minded Atheists and Agnostics' (emphasis mine own), the open-minded Prof said:

“The fundies want it all taught in a science class, but this will be a nice slap in their big fat face by teaching it as a religious studies class under the category ‘mythology,’”

He signed it, “Doing my part (to upset) the religious right, Evil Dr. P.”

As you might imagine, there was a considerable reaction to the Open-Minded Professor's injudicious remarks. There was so much reaction that, being the cynical sort that I most certainly am, when I first read about that assault my initial reaction was "How bizarre, and how very convenient. How unlikely it all sounds."

He may well have been beaten up, or injured somehow. But does it seem likely to you that the only thing he really remembers is that while hitting him with a large metal object they 'made reference to' the most recent instance where he made a public spectacle of himself, and he doesn't even get very specific about that?

Isn't it just a little too coincidental that these two nondescript (except they were white and drove a pick-up, naturally) men happen to represent the very group Mirecki desires to vilify? What better way to redirect attention from his own foolishness while justifying his hostility towards these ID thugs?

This post at Telic Thoughts includes some interesting comments in the comment section. It seems that Mirecki drove himself to the hospital and was treated and released. The police say they were dispatched to the hospital, yet at one point Mirecki claimed he called them from the roadside. He declines to explain the discrepancy to the reporter trying to get the ducks of this story all in a nice tidy chain. Mirecki said he could explain the discrepancy, he just didn't want to.

Verum Serum's reaction:
Mirecki is now the most famous atheist in America. He has been beaten for the cause, making him a martyr. Expect to hear about this in the very next Maureen Dowd column. Expect to hear about it on the Jon Stewart show. Expect atheist websites who had no problem with him verbally abusing Christians and using his position as a bully pulpit to tell this story ad infinitum....

So two idiots in a pickup have just turned Mirecki, who is still a creepy little man in my book, into a folk hero. Nice going, morons
.

Take away the two idiots in a truck and I think we might just be on to something.

8 comments:

  1. You have got to be kidding me. A man is beaten up and oh ho, not us sweet right wingers. Never happen. And if it did he had it coming anyway for DARING to question the moral authority of CHRISTIANS in America. Get a grip. This persecution complex is not only ridiculous as is it is SO not true but also horrifingly hypocritical. Your self righteousness is as against the teaching of Christianity as your repeated attempts to render unto God that which is Ceaser's. As a Christian myself I am embarrassed by not only the behaivor of those that beat the professor for having a different view but also by apologists like yourself.

    Please take a few minutes to spend with the words of Jesus and see how you can possible continue to reconcile what you say and do with what you claim your beliefs are.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anyone who drives himself to a hospital has not suffered a real beating. This is almost certainly a hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why would it be a hoax?

    Why would you want to be blind to the open bigotry that is going on in this country? The rise of theocracy is no longer a conspircy theory it is an open and ostentatious reality. Everyday "Christian" leaders are using eliminationist terms when speaking of both liberals and "secularists" (read as a code word for Jews). People like Dobson.

    Intolerance of the non-Christian is on the rise in this nation and either you are willfully blind to it or you believe that it is how it should be.

    Tell me, do you agree with Middle Eastern policies of persecution secularists and Christians in their nations? I mean the are Muslim countries, right?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The rise of theocracy is no longer a conspircy theory it is an open and ostentatious reality.

    LOL, you're funny. You're also a coward, though, "anonymous."

    BTW, when Jews use the words 'secularist' are they also employing it as a secret code word? Did you get your secret decoder ring from the Illuminati/Bildebergers, or direct from Halliburton?

    ReplyDelete
  5. And if it did he had it coming anyway for DARING to question the moral authority of CHRISTIANS in America.

    Anonymous, if you will show me anywhere in my post where I indicated that the Professor deserved to be beaten, then I will correct that error and we can talk.
    IF he was beaten up, whoever did it should be caught, prosecuted, and publicly derided. But at this point, that's a very big if.

    Anyone who can tell a reporter trying to sort out the facts (of an accusation that person made in the first place) "I can explain that discrepancy. I just don't want to" is somebody whose credibility is more than a little shaky.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ha ha. I don't have the time today Timmy but I will send you the immense amount of research about when the phrase changed with the political wind from Jewish Media to Liberal Media and for Jewish Institutions to Secular Institutions...mostly in the late 60s and early 70s.

    And I'm not a coward, I'm prudent. Over the election cycle someone threw a rock with a W in '04 sticker on in it holding down a note taunting my blog tag through the window in my living room. I have a small child that I don't want to put in harms way because I have opinions that upset others.

    I'm not here to troll. In fact I'm not sure what made me choose this blog to finally react to. It may have been the number of right edge blogs quoted as fact. A number of which can be easily debunked by reading credible news sources. It maybe that the argument that he did this to himself is so self serving here that I couldn't hold back. Or maybe I just didn't want to read one more blog entry so a reaction was what I needed to stop.

    My point is that mischaracterizing Mirecki and what he was doing does not make those that seek to harm and smear him correct. Kansas is being hurt by the inclusion of ID where it doesn't belong, in Science, and that teaching in it Religious Studies, Philospohy, or even History is more appropriate. Business don't want to go to Kansas (see the Governor's own comments on this), colleges do not want to enroll the students because they will have to relearn what science actually is.

    Parents have every right to teach their children what their beliefs and philosphies of life are, however, the duty and purpose of the public school system is to teach children good fundamentals and critical thinking skills. However, if we would like to slip into the scienceless poverty and malaise like many Middle Eastern countries than for all means lets become a Christian Theocracy. But, personally, I'd like to be able to compete in the world and would like my children to also.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm still waiting for you to defend your accusation that if the Professor was beaten, I believe he had it coming. That needn't take much time, the post isn't that long. If you cannot defend the statement, we shall consider that as your acknowledgment that you falsely accused me.

    My point is that mischaracterizing Mirecki and what he was doing does not make those that seek to harm and smear him correct.

    In what way was the Professor mischaracterized?
    How do you reconcile this statement with the way you have mischaracterized what I said in my post?

    Your self righteousness is as against the teaching of Christianity as your repeated attempts to render unto God that which is Ceaser's.

    I am not sure what you mean here. What repeated attempts have I made to render unto God what is Caesar's?

    As for reading 'credible news sources,' that's pretty much where the blogs I quoted from are getting their information. Professor Mirecki is not being straightforward with journalists. His story has some large holes in it and he does not seem to want to fill them in. The police have corrected the record (this is not being classified as a hate crime, Mirecki was not hospitalized, etc), and Mirecki has resigned *on the recommendation of his colleagues.*

    If you are not here to troll, I wonder how your posts would be different?

    ReplyDelete
  8. And I'm not a coward, I'm prudent. Over the election cycle someone threw a rock with a W in '04 sticker on in it holding down a note taunting my blog tag through the window in my living room. I have a small child that I don't want to put in harms way because I have opinions that upset others.

    ROTFL... At least Mirecki has the guts to tell such lies under his real name.

    ReplyDelete

Tell me what you think. I can take it.=)