Nobody asked me, but I'd like to pass on a couple tips on adopting. I'm not a professional, and the only experience I have is personal (our own adoptions and those of friends) and the ponderings of my head. It's just my own personal unsolicited advice, plain and simple.
I believe the research on the bonding that occurs in the womb is pretty well established now, and most adoptive parents are informed and educated on this point- but just in case- even if you adopt a newborn from the hospital, adoption is traumatic. You, the adult, have been longing for this day, but the baby knows nothing about it. The baby only knows that the familiar smells, tastes, sounds, and people he experienced in the womb are suddenly, abruptly, no longer part of his world. Adoptive parents need to be sympathetic, understanding, mindful, and compassionate of the trauma and loss even a newborn infant experiences at the sudden shock of a new home and new family.
It is also appropriate to be sympathetic to and ache for the pain experienced by a woman who has chosen to place her children for adoption, and even for the tragic case of a parent so abusive that choice has been made for (something horrible has happened to her to make her able to hurt her own children that way), and your frustration with her behavior or choices is not going to help the child. There is also a limit to what you can do with that compassion, we did not create her circumstances, they are generally beyond our remedy, and we are not responsible for them. In an ideal world, everybody would live happily ever after, but we don't live in an ideal world.
Because of the trauma experienced even by newborns, I believe it's important to limit outside contact as much as possible while the child regains some equilibrium and familiarity with his new world, and while bonding process develops and the relationship cements. This is so important. Biological children have several months of space to get used to the smells, tastes, and even sounds of their family (they hear and taste in the womb, and are born recognizing their mother's voices, and often those of siblings and the father). Adopted children, even if they are newborns, even if they are 'homegrown' and presumably from the same culture as the new family, are plunged into an overwhelmingly unfamiliar environment. You eat different things, you smell different, you sound different, your daily routines are different. Even healthy, emotionally mature and stable adults experience culture shock in similar circumstances. It's much harder on small children who haven't the language to process what's happening to them, who don't know enough to even know what to ask, and who haven't the emotional maturity to take everything in without a qualm. Furthermore, the circumstances that caused these children to be placed for adoption in the first place will complicate their adjustment as well. What they are experiencing is overwhelming, even if they are newborns, and they need the trauma of sensory overload cushioned as much as you can.
Often in an older adoption (not always, but often) they will hold their new parents at arm's length for all kinds of reasons, depending on their circumstances- they can't attach well, they don't trust people calling themselves Mom and Dad, they resent being adopted out and so they resent their adoptive parents, their ability to develop close, loving ties has been crippled by previous experiences, all sorts of reasons. But children still need physical contact and love, and they will get it where they can, and this makes them vulnerable to predators. What often happens is that adopted children will be extremely affectionate with strangers and acquaintances so that they can avoid physical contact at home, this strengthens their sense of insecurity when they need to be developing a sense of security, and is just not healthy or safe for them
Tell your friends and family to give you time with your new children. Ask your friends and family NOT to come over and shower the children with physical affection. You need to help these children learn to bond, and I believe it is healthiest for these new blessings to learn to come to you, their parents, to fill up their love buckets first, because you are the only constant in their lives now. Then they can add others to their circle, but they need this relationship with their new parents to be firm first, as it is foundational for their mental and emotional health, as well as for their personal safety. Child predators have a honed radar for seeking and finding vulnerable, insecure children. And if your friends and family will cooperate with you, this will be much easier. Instead of letting the new children climb up in their laps and give them hugs and cuddles, they need to be strong and self sacrificing enough to gently redirect the child to the new parent, saying something like, "I'm sorry, but I am just getting up to get a drink, why don't you go cuddle with your Mommy?" And then they need to get up and make themselves unavailable for snuggles. If they won't, don't have them around your kids until you are sure your kids are well bonded. It's that important.
Naturally, if you are not adopting but have friends who are, respect their space, don't enable their new children to fill up their love buckets with you instead of with their parents, and take your cue from the new parents. Ask them what's okay and what isn't, and do not dismiss their concerns or ignore their requests.
Here's another thought, based on our own experience. I don't think it's a good idea to tell children that their birth parents 'loved them enough to give them up.' Some of them are going to wonder what's going to happen when you love them that much. We learned this when one afternoon two of our children asked to go outside to play. It was their naptime, so I said no. One child turned to the other and said, "I can't wait until we're grown-ups, what about you? We can just go outside whenever we want to then." And her sister, who had been adopted less than a year prior, sighed and said, "No, that's not what happens. When you get bigger, they just give you a new mother."
We had a long talk that afternoon as I explained that no, she wasn't ever getting a new mother, I was the end of the road, and she was stuck with me forever. Because of the circumstances around her adoption and the explanations others (including the birth mother) had given her, I realized she needed stability and reassurance that I wasn't leaving the picture. She needed to know the safety net of permanence was there for her.
Children are funny and it's difficult to know how they will process what we tell them, but I think we might have seen that one coming if we'd thought about it very hard.
Part Two is here
I am regretfully closing comments to this post. Readers interested in reading further on the topic should read the book mentioned in the comments and might consider this site.
Post edited and revised, Feb. '09
Thursday, June 15, 2006
Unsolicited Adoption Advice
Posted by
Headmistress, zookeeper
at
6/15/2006 01:19:00 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)









12 comments:
And for the child to never know that there is a mother who lost her child to adoption .. is that right??? How do you handle that??? What answers do you give them when they are old enough to know they are adopted and start asking about where they really came from????
And what do you say when the child finds out they are adopted? What do you tell them about their mother? Don't you know that ancestry and blood bond is thicker than any adoption ever will be? Will you share with your adopted child the truth? After all, one day, he or she will wonder just where they really came from, who their mother and/or father is, and if they have other family members. Heritage and family are an inherent part of life and no child should be denied the truth. Parents who adopt are really like natural parents ... the children are in their care for just a certain period of time and then the child grows up and becomes his or her own person. How can this be accomplished if they don't have a clue to who they really are?????
RGValleyGal, I think you must be bringing some background of your own to this post that is skewing how you read. I am at a loss to know how anybody could read this post and conclude that we keep the adoption a secret until some unspecified day into the future.
You'll not find a single sentence in this post that advocates keeping it a secret and not telling a child anything about their background.
What I said was that I believe it is a mistake to tell them the *reason* the birth mother chose to make an adoption plan for them was because she loved them so much. This might be true, but it won't be understood properly by young children. Give them another reason, one suitable to their understanding.
You have zero justification for assuming that we don't tell our adopted children that they are adopted. In fact, it is quite obvious from this post that we do.
And thankfully, ancestry and blood are not thicker than any adoption ever could be, else our adoption by God would not be the glorious thing that it is.
I am sorry for whatever pain is in your background connected with this issue- but we didn't cause it, and your circumstances are not ours.
Please, please,please - do not ever tell the kids you adopted that god had something to do with their adoption! Talk about confusing!! I am an adoptee, and nothing about adoption ever made any sense to me. I always wanted to be with my mother, father and people. Find their mothers - let them either go back with their people or at the very least build a relationship with them!
I was spoiled rottten as kid - was surrounded by love, music and laughter - but I was not the child of those people - I didn't act like them look like them or think like them... I needed to be where I fit in. I yearned for my mother, I craved her - but my adopters never knew how deep my pain was - I smiled...and pretended everything was as it should be. They just didn't know, they couldn't have understood how much I wanted to be with my mother.
Adoption is not natural - mother and child are not supposed to be separated from each other. Adoption is LAST resort for a child - it is not about creating a family - it's not about serving the void and needs of others.
Of course adoption is not about serving the void of others- and you are so angry with your situation that you seem to have missed the fact that this was the point of my post! Obviously it's the last resort to a child, but I cannot help the fact that we do not live in an ideal world and sometimes the last resort is the only option.
You need to realize that the adoptive parents are NOT the people who created the last resort situation.
Anonymous, again, your pain is not our doing, and it is causing you to extrapolate wildly. And surely you know that every situation is not the same. Fortunately for us, we have adult cousins who are also adopted, and they think it's nonsense to say blood is thicker than water. They are very happy with their adoptive parents.
If you cannot stop making wild and unfounded assumptions and posting hysterical things here, I am going to have to stop approving your posts.
YOu don't know who we are or what our situation is, and every single one of your guesses about us has been flatly false. Get some help, please, talk to a minister, find a counselor, read the passages in your Bible about how much God loves us so much he adopted us (Romans 8, Ephesians 1, Galatians 4, Romans 9), develop a relationship with the Creator of us all and learn to put the pain of your past behind you. Lashing out at strangers for things they did not say or do is not a productive way of dealing with it.
If you would prefer to email me off list (not anonymously) to discuss these things further, my email address is in the side bar or my profile. I am sorry for you, but you either forget or do not care that my children read here and your anger is crossing the line.
Hello,
I am also an adult adopted person and a Christian. This blog caught my eye because of the issue of God and adoption. I heard Pastor Dick Bernal in CA preach a sermon one time that really stuck with me as an adoptee. He said that when the NT speaks of us of being adopted by God, the original Greek word actually means more of "re-instatement" as God's children, rather than adoption. So when God adopts us as His children in salvation, it is actually more like a reunion rather than an adoption. He was our original Father and Creator and we fell from Him as a human race, but are reinstated or reunited with Him in Salvation through Jesus. That was a huge comfort to me. It really bugs me when Christians say that adoption is not second best. That seems to completely deny my pain as an adopted person in losing my original identity, family, history, and heritage. I believe that God redeems us and our situation, but that it was never His original plan for me to be adopted. Just like Joseph in the Bible - he said "What you meant for evil, God TURNED for good." He didn't say that he believe God willed for him to be sold into slavery by his brothers, but that God delivered him from that experience and turned it for good.
As an adoptee who struggles with closeness particularly closeness to people I know love me
I find your comments quite interesting
the message your mommy gave you up because she loved you--really messes with the adoptee's head
It equates love with abandonment
but so does the entire adoption/life experience of the adopted child
babies are present at birth and separation--they experienced and they survivied it--the most loving gift an adoptive parent can give an adopted child is to give the child a truly safe place to acknowledge and process the adoption experience
this may not be with the adoptive parents
after all how many children who have experienced "abandonment" by one mother are going to risk telling their new mother "I miss my real mommy"
or "I wish I could go find her" or even "I wish you were really my mommy"
and another bind for young children trying to come to terms with adoption and what it means--
If I think about my first mommy who gave birth to me and then went away, new mommy will know it and be angry with me so I'd better not think about first mommy--but I miss her and don't understand why she went away
and the flip side--If I get too close to new mommy then my real mommy will know it and then she won't come back and I do so long for to come back
please remeber, young children are self-referencing
they believe that what happens to them and around them is BECAUSE of them
All the adoptees I know have answered the sad question--why didn't my mommy keep me by blaming themselves in some way--this happens around age 7 when kids begin to think logically
and it happens naturally because kids don't have the intellectual ability or life experience to see the adoption experience any other way
this can mediated with caring professional help
Intervention around age 7 can make a huge positive difference to an adopted child's emerging sense of self if the counseler really understands adoption trauma and the adoptive parents are secure enough in themselves to allow the child to express the full range of her emotions and thoughts on the subject
one last thought
there is no way for a child to find out they're adopted and not feel tremendous pain and confusion. In fact, "finding out" or "being told" is really the second trauma--the first trauma is losing natural mommy in the first place
If you haven't read Primal Wound by Nancy Verrier yet I would highly recommend it
she is an adoptive mom who works with adoptees and their families, both adoptive and reunited,
and she has dedicated her life to understanding her adopted daughter
We are hoping to adopt in the future, and I find your posts about your experiences very useful, including this one. I am clipping it to save.
Thank you.
the message your mommy gave you up because she loved you--really messes with the adoptee's head
It equates love with abandonment
Exactly.
but so does the entire adoption/life experience of the adopted child
Not necessarily. The 'entire life experience' of every adopted child is not the same. You don't know what life experiences every other adopted child has had. I cannot make statements about your life based on what our family has done and experienced, and others cannot make accurate claims about our life and experiences based on their personal experiences, and this has been very obvious by the false assumptions and guesses repeatedly made by those visiting from adoptionese.
the most loving gift an adoptive parent can give an adopted child is to give the child a truly safe place to acknowledge and process the adoption experience
That is indeed very important.
please remeber, young children are self-referencing
they believe that what happens to them and around them is BECAUSE of them
Yes. In fact, the first draft of this post contained a paragraph pointing out just that. I edited for space, assuming people would understand a single blog post was not intended to be a comprehensive treastise on the topic.
one last thought
there is no way for a child to find out they're adopted and not feel tremendous pain and confusion. In fact, "finding out" or "being told" is really the second trauma--the first trauma is losing natural mommy in the first place
I am at a complete loss to understand how anybody can read what I wrote here and assume there was ever a 'finding out' or 'being told' moment. As a point of fact, even if we had wished to keep it a secret until some deferred moment in time (which we never would have done under any circumstances) the fact is that in our situation the children were much older than our visitors from Adoptese are all assuming (again, making assumptions based on your own experiences is such a limited viewpoint). Our children knew perfectly well what had happened to them, they were there and they were old enough not to forget it even if we never referred to it again, which was certainly not the case. We did discuss it repeatedly and give them time and space to talk about it and we acknowledged (and still do) that it was deeply, deeply painful- and that this is true no matter how they feel about us.
Their situation was not of my making, and it was even less of theirs. It was painful and it's quite horrible and it is not anybody else's business. The circumstances were such that there just wasn't any chance of us ever needing to sit them down and say, "By the way, you're adopted."
So there has never, ever been a moment of 'finding out,' except when their first mother told them this was what she was doing, and I had nothing to do with that- she made that choice on her own and I wasn't even there. They did not know and could not really grasp the whys and wherefores, and frankly, neither can I sometimes. Our situation was such that I never had to tell them they were adopted, I had to grope for better explanations of why than those generally suggested in the literature I had seen.
First-thank you for this post.
Second- How can we tell when our motives are pure in this?
I think one of my main motivations in pursuing adoption has been conviction to "look after the orphans and widows" as God instructs us to. My husband and I try to follow this mandate in various ways that God puts in front of us. Recently it seemed that adoption was one of those ways. But I do have to admit that yes, I long to save a child that needs saving. My husband and I do want more children to love and have reasoned that when there are so many needy children it makes sense to build a family both biologically and through adoption. And I have really struggled and prayed to have a right heart but are my motives for doing right things ever 100% pure? Never.
The comments here have been frightening. But surely it is not best to leave children in orphanages? I am responding to the comments here as well as the original post.
I very much appreciate the insights in the original post. They make me want to re-examine my heart.
To the fifth poster (Anonymous 3, I think), I want to thank you for attempting to provide some rational, sensible, and level headed discourse and information here. Those of you considering adopting should consider her information- I don't agree with all of it, but it's a very good starting place.
I have known a handful who are very happily married mothers who were also adopted, and they would (and have) refuted most of the positions you all have espoused here- excepting this one thing, which Ruth and Lovejoy might wish to know. They cried when their first child was born because that was the first time they'd ever seen somebody related to them by blood.
Fortunately, this is not the case in our family. They see somebody related to them by blood every. single. day. Another assumption shot down.
RGValley girl, I am not going to approve the post you have pending, and this is why. You deny having made any assumptions about our "unique" situation (the scare quotes are yours and were silly).
This is patently false. Here are some of them:
And for the child to never know that there is a mother who lost her child to adoption
What child is that? Certainly not one you read about here.
.. is that right???
Of course not, and nothing here implies it is.
How do you handle that???
I don't need to 'handle that' because that isn't what happens.
What answers do you give them when they are old enough to know they are adopted and start asking about where they really came from????
Why do you assume my children were not old enough to know they were adopted at the time of the adoption? Why did you assume that they do not already know where they come from, and have, in fact, always known that?
And what do you say when the child finds out they are adopted?
This question has no bearing on our situation. There was never a time when the child 'found out' about the adoption. It happened when the child was old enough to know without being told.
What do you tell them about their mother?
YOu are making some unfounded guesses about the level of contact between the home of origin and this one. You are very wrong.
Will you share with your adopted child the truth?
How many times can you ask the same question, one which has no connection with the reality in our home?
After all, one day, he or she will wonder just where they really came from, who their mother and/or father is, and if they have other family members.
No, actually they won't. They won't wonder because they have always known this information. Another false assumption.
You are making wild and unfounded guesses about the level of contact.
Heritage and family are an inherent part of life and no child should be denied the truth.
You have no reason, none, as in zero, to assume that any children in my care are denied the truth about their heritage or family of origin. You don't even know what theirs is- or mine.
Parents who adopt are really like natural parents ... the children are in their care for just a certain period of time and then the child grows up and becomes his or her own person.
So far as I know, each of our children have always been their own person. Child are born persons, every one of them. Not a single one of mine is an exception.
How can this be accomplished if they don't have a clue to who they really are?????
The extra question marks you use are quite unnecessary and they do not make the point you think they do. Again we have another variation on the same false assumption. You do not know, nor do you have any reason to assume that my children do not have a clue about 'who they really are.'
Anonymous 2:
Find their mothers - let them either go back with their people or at the very least build a relationship with them!
"Let" them go back? You don't know whether that is an option. You don't know whether that would be safe. You don't know that there are people to go 'back' to. You don't know that they want to go back, and you do not know that there is no relationship.
So far, y'all are at zero for over a dozen wild guesses. Incidentally, you also do not know what I have already read on the topic. Can you stop guessing, now?
I do not know what happened to you and I will not presume to guess, but I can tell by your comments that it is not what's happening in my house. You are imposing your trauma on a different family and a different set of circumstances. the only 'nerve' you have hit is that I dislike it when people are dishonest (RGV found this post and posted it to your forum, you did not find your way here accidentally) and I dislike it when people jump to conclusions without facts.
I have never, ever known a parent who tried to keep the adoption a secret, never. I have read about them, mostly in the fifties and sixties. But not one adoptive parent I know keeps it a secret, refuses to acknowledge the existance of blood relatives, or in any way denies the truth about adoption to their children. Most adoptive parents I know have some contact with blood relatives.
I've also read studies, and they do not prove what you think they do.
Boaz's Ruth: Whew. Thank-you.
Lovejoy: You're right- we can never be sure of our own motives. But maybe if we recognize the danger, if a problem comes up we will be better forewarned and better able to accurately judge our own motives.
Many of the posters at adoptionese are bitter, angry women who regret the choice they made to place their children for adoption and they are now blaming everybody but themselves for it. I suspect that in retrospect some of them would have preferred to abort- that's how selfish pain can make you. Some of them clearly came from homes were secrecy was the order of the day, and that's a poor judgment, IMO. But it's not my fault their adoptive parents didn't choose to tell them about the adoption, nor is it my fault they never felt like they fit in. For that matter, I wasn't adopted and I never felt like I fit in, either.
I cannot speak to all the circumstances, but certainly adoptive parents should be aware that there is a bond even between unspeakably evil parents and their children, and it hurts to disrupt it, even when it needs to be disrupted. I wouldn't say that the self-blame begins at 7- our daughter told us at a much younger age that she was sure her mother gave her away because she was bad. We dealt with that as best we could, and in our (yes, RGValley Gal) unique situation, we could give information that made sense to her and made it clear that her birth mom's issues had nothing to do with her. Parents should be aware of that, because it's quite natural for a child to feel guilty and convinced something is wrong with him or her.
This is just me, but I do think there is a difference between being willing to be that safety net for a child who needs one, being open to be used by God to care for the fatherless, and seeing oneself as the noble self-sacrificing mode of salvation. Does that make sense?
In the first instance, one recognizes in all humility that God has used a donkey when He wanted to, there's nothing particularly amazing about yourself just because He uses you, too. In the second, the focus is on self, 'you' are the star of a little drama in your head.
Whenever we make ourselves the star of a little drama in our heads, we're certain to be blowing it in real life.
I have another unpopular opinion on a related subject, and that's foster care. I think it's wrong for social services to require foster parents to tell people "Yes, they are all ours, I'm the mommy." This warps the children's understanding of what a mommy is. I don't understand what would be so terrible about the children calling foster mother 'Auntie' or something similar.
I have other opinions on adoption, and if you want to email me I'll share. It seems the ants have over-run this post.
From today's sermon:
Collossians chapter 4, verses 5-6
5 Walk in wisdom toward them that are without, redeeming the time.
6 Let your speech be alway with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man.
It is with dismay and sorrow that acknowledge I failed to do that in most of my responses here.
I am sorry. Please forgive me.
Post a Comment