Monday, August 18, 2008

Books Build Character, 1

(reposted, slightly edited)

A few years back a friend and I exchanged our thoughts on how we can warn our children about the dangers of certain character flaws or the negative results of some of life's poorer choices. I prefer to use books. This is one reason why we don't limit our reading to books where the characters are all wholesome and practically perfect in every way. Another is that we don't wish to be more holy than the Bible, which also includes stories about men and women who were deeply flawed.

The Book of Books is, naturally, the best teaching tool of all.

But this post is about other books and how they may be used to teach character. I think there are some important benefits to teaching our children through the use of literary examples from books rather than from real life, although, of course, both can be used with good success. But, again, this post is about books.


1. Many of us live in small towns and attend small congregations. In my family's case, until this year we attended a local congregation where there were no children except our own. For a very long time there were no young married couples just starting out. We wouldn't be seeing a Lucy Steele (Sense and Sensibility) for many years. There are so many personality types and character flaws and specific situations that require wisdom and experience to understand, yet my children may not be exposed to any of them personally until they are actually threatened by a real life example. I think books have the edge on real life because of the simple proximity issue.

2. Gossip. I was able to discuss Lucy Steele with my daughters comfortably when they were about 12 years old. For those sad and deprived souls who do not know who Lucy Steele is, she is a character in Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility. She pretends to befriend Elinor, our heroine, but she is really interested in herself and using Elinor to get to a young man both ladies care for. She is interested in nobody's happiness but her own, and she doesn't much care how she pursues that aim. I have know women like Lucy Steele. I have even gone to church with one or two or them.
The first time my children read the book, they thought Lucy Steele's friendship was genuine, and were quite puzzled at the way she seemed to turn on Elinor later. We went back through Lucy's actions slowly, and I was able to point out subtle clues that her friendship was not what it seemed.
There are real 'Lucy Steeles' in the world and in the church buildings where we worship on Sundays. They do not all limit their attentions to unmarried men. I want my daughters to be forewarned and thus forearmed against this type of predator.

But teaching my girls about this is a delicate matter. I cannot use real life examples, even if they exist. I would never, ever, ever tell one of my young people that the woman sitting in the pew in front of us is after the husband of the woman sitting in the pew across from us. At the very least, consider the implications if an unwise, unwary or simply tired and thoughtless child let that slip in the wrong place! Oh, my!

I would also not like to tell my children too much about the unwisdom and sinful attitudes of people they know personally because children are such black and white creatures that I would fear I was making them very judgmental and harsh critics of their brethren. I think pointing out the flaws of our brothers and sisters in church to our children as an object lesson is a very dangerous route to take and bad for their characters. It can be done, and there may be times where it needs to be done, but never without the greatest tact and delicacy.

Dealing with fictional characters permits me to kick off my shoes a bit and get comfortable with the discussion. I cannot harm them, and there is no danger that a discussion that limits itself to fictional characters will stray over into gossip.

3. With books you get a microcosm of human experience in a very small space of time- sometimes the problems that we experience are only the result of years of wrong thinking, sinful attitudes and/or bad choices. A book can span a life time in a few hundred pages.

4. The possibility of my own error- let's return to my original example- the flirtatious woman who worms her way into friendships in order to attract the male- in a book, we can know without any doubt that this is the motivation of the Lucy Steele types. In real life, we must admit that only God knows the heart. What if I am wrong about the reason a woman behaves in a manner I view as flirtatious? What if I see somebody who seems to be encroaching her way into the affections of a married man, but I am mistaken? How hurtful would my unjust suspicions be if I voiced them publicly to anybody else- even my children!

Even in matters far less serious than this, if I am not careful about what I say to my children about others and I turn out to be incorrect in my assessment, how much damage have I done to my credibility with my children?

Perhaps I am right, but I do not know the full circumstances. Perhaps the woman in question actually knows she has a problem and is working quietly to overcome it. Is it possible I have unfairly planted a seed of mistrust of her personally in my children's hearts? I cannot really know her heart or her goals and desires. Who am I to judge the *intentions* of the servant of another-


I think with books, I can warn my children against certain character types long before we actually meet any of them without encouraging a judgmental and critical spirit, and without exposing them to personal unhappiness in the process.

to be continued

11 comments:

AnonAmom said...

I agree! Two of my children have had the opportunity to see "Wicked" (I won't let them read the book) with their school music groups on separate tours to NYC. Both immediately identified a neighbor as "Glinda." Our dear neighbor has been told, first gently and then more forcibly, to not come in our home when we're not here and re-do our furniture, curtains, spice cabinet, read our private correspondence (once I couldn't find a check - she asked when I called if it was this one for this much or that one for that much)and open boxes packed for shipping! Her motive is that she knows better how to do things than we. My children envision this poor dear singing "Popular!" We recognize others from books, and yes, we've noticed our share of Jane Austen characters, men and women, as well.

I think its very important for children to recognize that some people have motivations for action that are different than their own. To do so is part of building empathy skills and relating well to others, despite their supposed "Asperger's traits." In fact, I would dare say that my children, who read more than they watch media, are better equipped than many of their peers to deal with the real world of people when they leave my little nest.

AnonAmom said...
This post has been removed by the author.
AnonAmom said...
This post has been removed by the author.
Timotheus said...

Anonamom... wow... I assume you gave her a key before you knew of this propensity? If neighbors entered our home after having been told not to, they'd be lucky to leave without 9 mm holes in their bodies.

Harper said...

Wonderful post, as usual! I think, although you may bring it up later, that another benefit of fiction is that it allows a view from "above." When discussing the real world, no matter how distant the relationship, there exists a certain amount of fog around the behaviors of those involved. The behavior of Lucy Steele only comes into real focus when one can also observe the behaviors of Elinor, Edward, and Fanny. Likewise, the ridiculousness of Marianne becomes apparent only when compared to Elinor and when observed in relation to Willoughby and Col. Brandon. Anyway, the distance and insight into characters' thought processes is useful for "getting" the big picture.

Dickens is also an excellent source for such observations.

Laura A said...

I like this. The method is also time-honored, being more or less the same as the prophet Nathan used with King David. Books get under our skin and teach us all kinds of things that direct lecturing can't.

Janice Campbell said...

An excellent and thought-provoking post. I thought you'd like to know that I included it in the Carnival of Homeschooling at my blog: Taking Time for Things that Matter.
http://www.janice-campbell.com/2008/08/19/carnival-of-homeschooling-more-to-school-than-textbooks/

I read your blog often, and appreciate the time you take to share your thoughts.

Kim said...

There is so much, other than plot, theme, pov, conflict, etc. that can be learned from good book discussions. I identified closely with this post. In addition to not assuming motives, my children and I have also learned a bit about empathizing with other people. We have read many books that don't mirror our lives in the least. Many of those books are titles that many moms in our homeschool group would not allow their children read or hear. I, however, think it's important for children to learn that yes, this is a work of fiction and those characters may not in the least resonate with your life, but there are children out there who would relate a great deal to those characters and situations. And as you so eloquently posted, they are learning not to assume the motives and/or circumstances of others.

Bella's momma said...

What a wonderfully inspiring post. Thank you so much for taking the time to write it!

Dana said...

So totally agree. It is so much easier to start with a fictional...or even historical...situation and really look at the character issues involved. And it is a safe way for children to really talk about it without feeling like they or their friends are the subject.

Barbara H. said...

I came here from a link at Amy's Humble Musing, and I am so glad I did. This is one aspect of reading I had not quite thought of in this way, but it is so true.