Thursday, July 31, 2008

Weddings, Words, and Woad

Our thrift shop has a half price day once a month. I rushed my huisband and youngest daughter out the door this morning to make it there before all the carts were gone and all the best things picked up by people who wouldn't appreciate them like I would- and sure enough, there were still plenty of carts.
There were also still plenty of awesome things.
And no crowds.

Because the 1/2 price day isn't today, it's next Thursday. Oops.

Still, I picked up a few things for wedding decorations and other goodies. There is a booth of craft supplies there, and it's always 2.00 a bag. You never know what you'll find. Today I stuffed my bag with some silk ivy leaves, three yards of dark purple felt, four yards of dark brown, about 20 paper doilies, a mold for making little doll hands with fimo dough (polymer clay, although I suppose you could use other clay as well), a stack of free baskets, an unused pattern for camisoles and girl boxers, some rub on transfers of red and green seed packets, carrots, tomatoes, watermelon and peas (cute), three cream colored metal pails, a bag of little 6 inch wooden rulers that say 'The Golden Rule,' about 20 small teddy bear erasers and erasers that say, "Jesus erases my sins," and a bag full of red and white silk rose petals such as you might strew about a table at a wedding reception. If your wedding was red and white.

At first I thought we'd just use the white petals. Then I remembered that I learned in kindergarten that blue and red make purple, so I thought I'd dye the red petals with blue dye and see how that worked out. But I forgot to stop and get blue dye, and we don't run back into town on whims, so I looked up natural blue dyes. I knew they were hard to find (blueberries, probably, and we dont' have any and if we did we'd eat them).

So that's how I came across this very interesting bit of information:

According to the textbook for this course Plants In Our World by B. B. Simpson and M. C. Ogarzaly (1995), woad was one of the dyes used to make the green outfits worn by Robin Hood's men deep in Sherwood forest. Their clothing was dipped in a blue dye bath of woad, and then in a bath of yellow weld from the leaves of Reseda luteola, a member of the mignonette family (Resedaceae). The mixture of blue and yellow produced the characteristic green color associated with England's legendary bandit who robbed from the rich and gave to the poor. Apparently, the fermented, pulpy masses of woad leaves produced such a foul stench that early woad dyers were prohibited from heavily populated urbanized areas. In fact, Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603) decreed that no woad processing could take place within five miles of her residence.


Woad is made from a mustard plant. I don't know if it's the same sort of wild mustard we have growing around here or not. I don't think I'll be experimenting. It sounds unpleasant. But don't you just love the name 'woad?' Doesn't it sound all Picts and Saxons and ancient? Sadly, it probably was not used by the Picts to decorate themselves, though it may have been used on their fabric.

According to the article linked above, some people believe that the German word for Woad is the origin for our 'weed.'

For more information on making dye from woad, see here.

Two Bowls and a Glass Dome

Go look at the new pretty!

10 y.o. Handcuffed...

And carted off in a paddy wagon for bringing a pair of scissors to school. She's not accused of threatening anybody with them. I don't see an explanation of why she brought them, and I could see taking them away and issuing a reprimand.
But calling the police, carting her off in a patrol car, and then suspending her for five days seems a bit excessive.

IMPORTANT UPDATE:
Thanks once again to my brilliant army of unpaid editors, spellcheckers, and factcheckers- I missed that this story is a couple years old. Blush, blush, blush.

TXmom77 says they apologized and reduced her 'sentence' to two days- which still seems excessive.

Boycotting McDonald's

Kim at Life in a Shoe explains why. I'm afraid this a boycott that won't mean much for us to participate it. My Progeny have been boycotting McDonald's since I was pregnant with the FYG, now 12, and craved a Quarter Pound with Cheese all day, every day. I believe I had the only young children in the world who would plead with me after church, "No, please, not McDonald's! CAn't we go home and eat leftovers?!"

Oh, Don't Be Such a Bigot

From the Times story on Obama's time as a teacher at the University of Chicago Law School comes an interesting 3 page story. It's interesting because Obama is interesting, and it's interesting for what it reveals about the reporter more than for what he reveals about Obama:

Before he outraised every other presidential primary candidate in American history, Mr. Obama marched students through the thickets of campaign finance law. Before he helped redraw his own State Senate district, making it whiter and wealthier, he taught districting as a racially fraught study in how power is secured. And before he posed what may be the ultimate test of racial equality — whether Americans will elect a black president — he led students through African-Americans’ long fight for equal status..

It's a small piece of a larger article which deserves a larger reading. I enjoyed reading it, and I enjoyed what I learned about Obama.
But no, whether or not Americans vote for the man is not the ultimate test of racial equality. What a load of bigoted hogwash. I'm not voting for him because I disagree with his record- which is Marxist, I am prolife (he's not met an abortion he didn't like), and I'm a fiscal conservative, and he's Big Government (like George Bush).

I admire his talent, his drive, his incredible skill with a crowd, his charisma, his speaking ability, his apparent virtues as a father, I just don't agree with his politics. IT's, you know, why I am not a Democrat. Whether Americans elect him or not is the ultimate test of what Americans think we want this election season, and it has very little to do with race. For some of us, anyway.

Roger Kimball has more:
I stopped short reading that because I think it gets the issue 100% wrong. The implication is that if Obama is not elected, then Americans fail the test. But that, I submit, is a racist idea. How many liberals do you know who plan to vote for Barack Obama because he is black, that is to say, for a racist reason? Sure, they also like the fact that he plans to institute a European-style confiscatory tax plan. They approve of his socialistic plans to increase the size and intrusiveness of the government. They share his skepticism about our presence in Iraq and contemplate his call for “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the United States military with equanimity, even pleasure. Really, though, all that is icing on the cake. They have closed ranks around Obama on account of the very thing that Obama pretends he wishes to transcend: the color of his skin.

Making a List

Because sometimes it's hard to remember what you know:

I know, it's hands-on education that is the wave of the future. But my hands are going to be very full for the next year, feeding two babies. A lot of things that are simple to do with a baby on one arm can't be done at all with two.

So I greatly appreciated it when my sister suggested that I make a list of things to recite with, sing to, or otherwise practice with the older ducklings that I didn't need my hands available to do. Specifically, they have to be things I already know myself by heart, so I don't have to look them up in order to do them with the kids. It doesn't make for a grand or well-organized scheme, but the list provided plenty of things suitable for preschoolers to do during nursing sessions for the next several months.

I wasn't quite this organized about it, but I kept an index card in my purse with a list of simple songs and games to amuse the Progeny while we were out and about. They were easy things I knew by heart- but the list helped bring them to mind when the mind would not cooperate and bring them to me.

Contraband Milk

From Reason Online:

In April police hauled off Mark Nolt in handcuffs for being a dairy deviant. Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court cited the Mennonite farmer for contempt after he ignored a 2007 injunction prohibiting him from selling raw milk and cheese.

He's required to get a permit. He objected, saying that the Constitution allows him to participate in private business exchanges. His customers didn't care whether he had a permit or not.

The arresting officers were joined by several representatives of the state Department of Agriculture. The assembled forces swarmed onto the farm, loaded several trucks with contraband milk and cheese, and left with an inventory worth thousands of dollars. In addition to the loss of his stock, Nolt faces a $1,000 fine for each violation of Pennsylvania’s dairy regime.


I am reminded of Joel Salatin's 'Everything I Want To Do Is Illegal'.

What We Thought We Knew

About Iraq, and how it might not be so. Or, what did they know, and when did they know it, those SEnators who voted against the war back in the day of October 11, 2002...

In Which The Equuschick is a Failure as a Bride

See, after she got off work at 2 pm the other day she made the dire mistake of "stopping by" a local printing shop to see about wedding invitations. She somehow thought she'd ask for some price quotes, maybe choose a style and check "order so many of these" and be on my way.

Marcia thought otherwise. Marcia, who ran the shop, thought The Equuschick should have a seat and look through four or five binders from 200 different companies and she would "turn her loose."

The Equuschick is a new kind of bride altogether. The kind who has a very short attention span, and can't get that worked up anyway about the subtle difference between style 1145 and 1146.


So she took out pen and paper and began noting the cheapest styles and page numbers, and when she thought she'd spent enough time to appear politely interested she picked her favourite of the two cheapest and told Marcia she was ready to order. Evidently, she wasn't though.

First, The Equuschick had to pick what you call the "verse", the actual text of the message. Ohhhhhhhhhh, okay. How about the one beginning "In Christian Joy?" She did like that one very much and plus she found it in two seconds, so HOORAY.

At this point, insert a harried fifteen minutes where The Equuschick called the DHM to see how she wanted her name, the HM to see if he wanted his military title or not, and Shasta to see how he wanted his mom, his dad, and his stepmom all worked into it.

So then The Equuschick was ready to order, right?

HA. Then The Equuschick had to choose font, said Marcia, all giggles and delight. There were about four pages of font styles.

The Equuschick's ADD writhed in agony. She looked at the first page and pointed. "I want that one."

"Are you sure you don't want to look at the other selections to see if there is one you want more?!", said Marcia.

Look Marcia, The Equuschick wanted to say but didn't, you're very sweet. You're a doll. You are insane if you think I'm going to spend any time whatsoever agonizing about types of font. It isn't like we're talking dog breeds here. Or even chocolate.

She was ready, yes?


They got her again. Seals. She had to pick seals. The darn things need seals.

Actually, once The Equuschick reassured herself that the seals were included in the total price, she did enjoy looking through the seals. This is because there was only one page, of about a dozen. Nice. She could focus now.

Bells? Too cheesy. Ivory rose? Pretty. Doves? An animal! The Equuschick could actually care now! "The Two Shall Become One." Classic, of course. "On this Day I Will Marry My Friend." Aww.

(The Equuschick picked that one, for those of you with enough estrogen to actually care.)



The Common Room hopes the invitations will arrive today. They were supposed to be in Tuesday, but Marcia requested that The Equuschick pick them up on Wednesday because, she said, "I won't be in on Tuesday and the boys will just be like 'we don't know anything about what's going on!" (Marcia is rather a character, yes.)

But they weren't in yesterday, after all. The Equuschick is rather tired of all this wedding nonsense.

Into Government Dependency

That's where this table from Maggie's Farm indicates Obama's plan is sending us. Of course, with 1 in 11 of us on food stamps, I don't know that we have so very far to go.

booklist

1) Mystics, Mavericks, and Merrymakers: An Intimate Journey among Hasidic Girls by Stephanie Levine - I read this because it was mentioned in Wendy Shalit's Girls Gone Mild. For her doctoral thesis, Levine spent a year living among Lubavitch Hasidic Jews in New York. She started out with the assumption that since there are such rigid gender expectations in the Hasidic world, the girls there would be repressed and unhappy. Much to her surprise (some liberals really live in a very narrow world), this was not the case. Girls living in a society with strict gender constructs, she found, seem much more at liberty to be themselves and speak their minds in some cases. Well, duh. They're comfortable in their roles and are free to explore the depth of their reality. No one picks on Bach for not being a painter as well as a great composer - we recognize his genius in the one part of the world he worked in. In the same way, in a society where roles are clearly defined, people are free to work richly in one spot without doing half-baked jobs in several different roles.
Also, as someone who grew up homeschooled in a house filled with mostly females, it was really no surprise that she found girls raised in similar circumstances to be very out-spoken. Without the pressure to behave in a way that would be attractive to guys (which is, as far as I can tell, what half of normal schooling can be about), there's a lot more intellectual freedom than most people think.
This was still not a perfect book. For some odd reason, Levine chose to closely profile two of the definite Rebels in the Lubavitch community. I can understand doing one of them. Two was a bit much in a book with only a few profiles - especially when she chose to go into detail about how very rebellious these girls are. yech. I would not just hand this book to a young person or to a guy to read because of these parts. Also, she (in my oh-so-humble and well-founded opinion) laid the blame for some issues on the wrong cause. She sometimes follows the argument that girls lash out in anger because they're expected to be nice, and that's too high of an expectation. Irritating. Thoroughly so. As my Dad likes to say, children will rise to your expectations... and if they're super low, that's all they'll meet.
Aaand not related to the book, but to Hasidic philosophy - as a Christian, I found parts of this book heartbreaking. Part of the Lubavitch mindset is an evangelistic one - getting Jews to practice their Judaism and to perform more "holy acts." If they can get enough Jews doing enough holy things (lighting a menorah, observing Shabbos, etc.), then one day one of those holy acts might usher in the Messiah. That's all backwards and so devastating...from the Christian perspective, NOTHING we do can be holy enough to bring the Messiah. He came because we were sick, not because there were finally Jews enough refusing to carry a burden on the Sabbath.
*cough* I'm sorry, but I've got another sidenote here - this book was also a good reminder that the Judaism today is *not* the Judaism of the Old Testament. Sometimes people get very enamored with the idea of incorporating more Judaic philosophy into their lives so they can get to the "root" of Christianity. The problem with this is that most of the Judaism today is a Judaic world without the temple and one built only on the words of men (rabbis) and mystic philosophy.

2) Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow - Yes! I finished this (all 700 plus pages of it)... and liked it quite a bit. Hamilton was brilliant. He understood what early America needed to function smoothly and he worked hard to put those things in place. He saw past the hazy optimism of the early years and got down to the hard practicalities of running a country, something that got him lambasted as a power-hungry fiend by those who preferred their rose-colored glasses (namely Jefferson & Madison).
Not a perfect guy - no, but one whom I respect a great deal.

3) Death On A Quiet Day by Michael Innes - A British mystery by one of my favorite "fluff" authors. REad this during a looong layover coming down to Texas. Innes was a university professor, actually, so his mysteries always include delicious literary or historical references. Good stuff.

4) The Knowledge of the Holy: The Attributes of God: Their Meaning in the Christian Life by A. W. Tozer (yes, the title really goes like that...odd, I know).
This is an incredible book. Out of all the books I've read this year, this one is the most beautiful and worthwhile.
I think the entire theme of this book can be summed up when Tozer says, "To be right we must think worthily of God. It is morally imperative that we purge from our minds all ignoble concepts of the Diety and let Him be the God in our minds that He is in His universe."
And so in this book, Tozer works to purge our minds of these ignoble ideas and start to fill them with the wonder and awe that truly belong to the Great Creator and Redeemer.
Really, if you haven't read this one yet, you should. It's short - but SO rich.
"The mind looks backward in time till the dim past vanishes, then turns and looks into the future till thought and imagination collapse from exhaustion; and God is at both points, unaffected by either."

5) The Voyage of the Dawn Treader by C. S. Lewis - the only re-read this month. I think it is still my favorite of the series... I cried reading the last chapter today. Those on the Dawn Treader had been through so many of what the world would call "adventures," and yet the most exciting part of the book is when they find themselves sailing in beauty & peace to the borders of Aslan's Country. Lewis describes so well the aching joy of being so near to something so beautiful... and not being able to go there yet. There are still things to be done in our own world, and so we must carry the sweet hope with us as we go about doing things now.

Relativity and the Speed of a Small Boy

The Boy usually takes about three hours to do his schoolwork. Not too shabby. Another 40 minutes for chores. Longer if he's busy being goofy.

This morning he asked The Equuschick if she would take him to the creek to swim when he finished all his chores and school. She was up, because the horses have to eat at the same time every morning, but she told him yes and went back to bed.

Less than one hour later he had finished all but two of his chores and school studies- and he couldn't do those two because the person he does them with spent the night away from home last night and wasn't back yet. He also was dressed for the crick, had his swimming tube in his hand, and was standing in her room, hands in his pockets, whispering, "When are you gonna get up?"

The Surprising Study on Hate Crime

From LaShawn Barber:

According to the report, “white supremacists” accounted for 17 percent of all hate crimes,


Click through to find out who did the rest.

Israeli Prime Minister to Step Down

More at Polipundit

We may never pass this way, again....

If you're anywhere near my age (or a fan of good music) you're now humming Seals and Crofts, because with my blog title I have, without mercy, committed an act of cranial terrorism. The next song on the track should be Hummingbird, Don't Fly Away.

But I am trying to commit a different sort of cranial act- as my poor dad says sometimes when he's trying to remember a riddle to tell my son, "I'm trying to put this in your brain." Only the brain is mine. I blog for myself as much as for any other purpose. I want to feel the following so deeply that I actually act on it instead of live the regrets that are expressed here:

What am I to do? I expect to pass through this world but once. Any good work, therefore, any kindness, or any service I can render to any soul of man or animal let me do it now. Let me not neglect or defer it, for I shall not pass this way again. --An Old Quaker Saying It isn't the thing you do, dear, It's the thing you leave undone, Which gives you the bitter heartache At the setting of the sun; The tender word unspoken, The letter you did not write, The flower you might have sent, dear, Are your haunting ghosts at night.


More at Linda's Thoughts

The Not Really So Horrible Very Bad Day

This is an old post about a day we had about seven years ago. I've made a couple changes and polished it up a bit for reposting.


We lived 45 minutes from town, so I always tried to combine doctor and dental appointments and any other ‘in town’ activities with every errand we might need to run for the week. This is the account of one of those days.

Three kids had dental exams, so it was also library day, and grocery store day, and thrift shop day, and this time it was also birthday shopping day and bank day. We should have known it was not a safe day for us to be out when our first errand, the dentist, resulted in one child needing a baby tooth pulled because it had wedged itself solidly against the permanent tooth and wouldn't move. Very bloody. There was a great deal of trauma, distress, and squealing.

I think the child was also pretty unhappy about it all.

We didn't get all our errands done, which I hate, and I couldn't find what I wanted for our Cherub's birthday (which would be the following day) which is a pain because it's very, very, very hard to find presents for her.

She plays with nothing and likes nothing but eating and pestering her sisters and coloring. Okay, she likes music, too, and turning pages in a book (it does not matter what the book is, because she won't look at it. She just turns the pages). Do you know how many crayons and coloring books she's had in her life? All I wanted was a jack in the box, but every store I went to was sold out.

She soaked, and I mean soaked, herself to the point that I had to just buy her a new outfit, which is never easy because she's such a funny shape. Imagine a child's pair of pants, size 8, stretchy material, and an adult woman's medium t-shirt. Almost a
perfect fit- the only place it's not perfect is the shoulders, which are just a teeny bit too wide for her. But otherwise, an adorable outfit. Fortunately we were in the Big Lots parking lot, so pants, shirt, and underwear were 13.00. I was so grateful that she did not have her little episode outside of Nordstroms or something. Of course, we'd have to BE outside of Norstroms for that to happen, and that's a highly unlikely event.

Then a stranger stopped to tell me we were losing our tail pipe, and the then 11 year old Pip said, "Oh, that's the noise I heard!" I pulled into a parking lot to fix it and had nothing but the flowery sash to a child's drawstring purse, so I tried to tie it up and thought I did fine, when a man from the business which owned the parking lot I used came out with a clothes hanger, shaking his head and saying, "That's never gonna hold," and he fixed it- which was lovely. I was so grateful (the next day) to that stranger and business owner who were such a blessing on a very frustrating day.

We went into the natural foods store to eat at the salad bar, and a sad young punk fascinated us all by walking in holding a very bloody t-shirt to his face. He had been wearing the t-shirt, but the fact that he was in our salad bar area naked from the waist up (and did I mention he was a punk? Because we could see most of his boxers, too) wasn't that significant because he was a bloody mess. And I am not swearing in British.

He wanted ice for a gash just above his eye and through his eye brow, at least three inches long and very deep. It was a skate boarding accident. I was not thinking clearly, and didn’t do anything but sit and look at him and think, “oh, his poor mother.” I'm still regretting not walking up to him and gently telling him, "Son, this eye really needs stitches, bad." I was too stunned, and then he left. I looked for him a few minutes later, but he wasn't in sight, and I heard two friends of his talking, and it sounded like he wasn't planning on getting treatment. I wish I had thought quicker and offered to take him myself. He really _needed_ stitches. I still regret that I did not think or act quickly enough to help himold. I prayed for him, but I wish I had helped more. That was an opportunity lost.

At one of our last stops only the firstborn needed to go in so the rest of us sat in the van and I read aloud The Owl and the Pussycat, twice, and the sixth child cried because she was cranky, and the seventh child whined because he was cranky, (they were, I think, about 4 and 2 at the time) and the children were all so tightly packed in with groceries and books that nobody could move, and I started soothing them with words of understanding and sympathy, "Poor babies, they need to be hugged, and cuddled, and read to and sung to and played with and they need-"
"-to be hit on the heads with a mallet" my saucy, but really tender hearted Equuschick broke in.

We let the little ones take off their shoes and socks and we sang "If you're happy and you know it wiggle your toes" and they were happy for a few minutes, but then their feet were cold (we told them this would happen), and we sang fisherman songs at the Boy’s request and then we started home. Finally.

And on the way home, late at night (we left home at 10:30 a.m. and it was now 8:30 p.m.), The Cherub was getting a rare treat of riding in the front seat for the last time ever for the rest of my life and hers, although we did not then know it was such a momentous occasion.

The reason why this was her last chance to ride in the front seat, ever, for the rest of her life or mine, is because suddenly the dome light came on and we realized that she had opened the door (something she has never been able to do before) of our moving van.

Did I mention we were on the highway? Did I mention that we were on a highway going 70 mph? Well, we were. Yes. It was all that you are imagining and then some.

So, I pulled over instantly, with great presence of mind (if I do say so myself, and look! I just did) putting on the emergency blinkers, grabbing the Cherub's arm so she couldn't go anywhere (although she was well buckled in and I didn't *think* she could unbuckle it, five minutes previously I would have bet money that she could not open the car door), gently applying the brakes so we came to a safe stop while carefully steering so that we parked in a safe place at the side of the road- and I took these calm, correct, emergency measures all at the same time- but while my body was acting rationally and calmly, my mouth was in full panic mode and I could hear a disembodied voice that, oddly, belonged to me, and that voice was wildly screaming something about "never, never, never, never, never, no never, not ever, never, do you hear me?? never, never, never do that!"

Why is it that parents tend to ask "Do you hear me?" in tones that could be heard across three counties and picked up in outer space by a minor satellite?

As we came to a complete and final stop, I reached across and slammed the door shut and turned the van key off in one fluid motion. Do not ask me how (and I think I was still yelling ‘never, never, never, never, never').

I then began the emergency attempt to get her out of the front seat and over the groceries between us and into the backseat, because I was not driving so much as a city block with her in the front seat again. The oldest two girls were helping me try to get the Cherub to shift- and she looks small and weak and frail, but when she doesn't want to move, she goes all floppy and does the civil disobedience thing. She would NOT lift her feet to step over the groceries and we did not want her feet in them (picky of us, I know, but there were eggs in the bags, and no, it did not occur to anybody to move them), and I am still talking, well, rather LOUDLY about what she just did, and that same 11 year old from before quietly and curiously inquired from the back of the van "Why don't you just open the door and take her out the usual way?" Since we're not moving anymore?"

And I and my two oldest children looked at each other in astonishment that we did not think of this. So we quietly shifted the Cherub from front to back in a civilized fashion, by opening the door like civilized people and having her climb out the front door and into the van through the side door.

It dawned on me that Cherub was looking at me like I'd lost my mind (because..... yes. I had), and she looked a little afraid. I am sorry. I do not want her to be afraid of me, but I do want her to be afraid to open the door in a moving vehicle. I was feeling very embarrassed and ashamed of myself, but when we put her in the back seat and her oldest sister got in front and we started driving, she started giggling, and giggling some more, and cracking up- the way you do when something ridiculous has just happened, or you've just put something over on your family and you can't stop thinking about the hilarious looks on their faces, and she laughed harder and merrier pretty much all the way home- she was _very_ pleased with herself. And utterly out of my reach (and yes, years later, parts of this are really very funny).

But this is now. That was then. And I wasn't having any fun. At all. I'd hurt my knee somehow and it was throbbing. My back has been nearly a lifelong enemy of mine, and it was cripplingly painful at that moment, and I wasn't done driving home. And another old problem was troubling me so I could hardly lift one foot to the gas pedal without pain.

Okay, I exaggerate. I could not even come close to moving my leg without agony. I would learn- a few minutes after we arrived home- that I could, in fact, hardly walk.

When we did arrive home and I got out of the van, I could only move by shuffling like a little old lady from the van to the couch- I could not actually lift my feet.

Meanwhile, we had another 20 minutes of driving, and I had a dark, dark moment where I thought of The Cherub opening car doors in moving vehicles when I'm 60, and even more despairingly I suddenly thought,

"I don't think I can do this for the rest of my life."


Immediately after that thought, we saw Orion's belt glowing in the sky, and I thought again, "God doesn't ask me to do this the rest of my life. HE just asks me to do it right now."
And then, if the Lord tarries, a little bit more after that.

Thank-you God, that life is really only one day at a time.

You know what else I notice about this story? At the time I first wrote it, it all was still fresh on my mind- the pain, the trauma, the stress- and that's what I thought I was writing about. But every time I read this again I notice how blessed we were. The Cherub's accident was in front of the organic grocery- which shared the parking lot with Big Lots where I could replace all her clothes for 13.00. It wasn't in the commissary or at the library, bank, or dentist's. There was a stranger who told me about my tail pipe. And the first parking lot I turned into? It was an Auto Zone or some such place. I didn't even notice. The man with the coat hanger worked there, and he didn't even try to sell me anything (the HM went back there to buy the parts he needed to fix it later) The Cherub did open a door on a moving van- but nobody was around us, she did it at a place we could pull over safely, nothing fell out, and NOBODY fell out. We got a tooth pulled without having to make another appointment with the dentist (unheard of)- I never noticed any of these things as blessings the day they occurred. I only saw the bad stuff. It was five years later, when I first reposted this that I looked it over again and saw each of those things in relief- standing out against the backdrop of a day I thought was horrible (I had no idea how much worse a day could be)- blessings it took me five years to notice and thank a kind Providence for providing.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

One Step At a Time

A centipede was happy quite,
Until a frog, in fun,
said: "Pray, which leg comes after which?"
This raised her mind to such a pitch,
she lay distracted in a ditch,
considering how to run.

Quote

“A ‘no’ uttered from the deepest conviction is better than a ‘yes’ merely uttered to please, or worse, to avoid trouble.” (Mahatma Gandhi)

Prisons and Education

Shasta hit a double header and 'forced' me to take a good two hour chunk out of my day when he sent me this link to a story, saying he thought I might find it interesting because of the connection with education. I did find it very interesting, and it bisects with a couple topics that have been interesting me of late:

More than a year after the state tried to reform the Texas Youth Commission, many inmates in TYC prisons receive poor schooling from overwhelmed teachers plagued by badly designed programs, a new report claims.

"We found the instructional practices to be generally poor," said a review compiled by TYC's Office of the Independent Ombudsman.

For example, the report said, some instructors spent most of their time "trying to maintain control in the classroom," and "many teachers reported that they felt unsafe." In other cases, teachers allowed youths to do nothing beyond such activities as "watching Hollywood movies in math class."

Also, students who can't read well are expected to learn by reading independently. And "many of the observations" by the ombudman's researchers "revealed a lack of instructional activities whatsoever."


TYC is the Texas Youth Commission. Bascially, it's 'juvie'- the agency that oversees the incarceration of juvenile offenders. It's been in trouble in Texas since:
last year after agency guards and administrators were found to have sexually and physically abused young inmates. All high-ranking agency managers resigned, retired or were fired, and TYC was placed under a conservatorship.


Harrell, the ombudsman above, is concerned that the 'punitive' nature of the TYC is incredibly disruptive to education, and this is particularly disturbing education is is so integral to any meaningful rehabilitation efforts.

Scott, at Grits for Breakfast, primarily blogs about Texas criminal justice issues, and he's had several posts about the TYC, most recently here.

In a post from last June he says:
First, the Texas Observer blog wonders if the Texas Youth Commission can ever be fixed as long as it remains a dumping ground for the failures of schools and the indigent mental health system.

Perhaps the agency has been so hard to rehabilitate because its problems extend beyond a handful of troubled facilities or a flawed approach to juvenile justice. Mental health advocates blame public officials’ failure to recognize the importance of early intervention programs within the mental health system statewide as a key culprit.

“If we addressed these problems early on, with community and school-based programs, these kids wouldn’t end up at TYC,” says Jodie Smith, public policy director of Texans Care for Children.


In a recent News and Views post- posts I mainly put up for my two high school students to use for their news notebooks- I mentioned the problem we have with high incarceration rates in this country. There were were just two comments to that post, but both were very good and thought provoking.

To recap:

This is an longish but important read on the prison problem.

Grits for Breakfast
has a post comparing Texas prison rates with those of the entire nation of Mexico- and there's a bit of perspective there on why we have such a high rate of incarceration.

The WSJ also had a good piece on the hidden costs of our high incarceration rates.

Marcy, who blogs at Marcy's Musings, said she was still clarifying her thoughts on this important issue, but she did graciously share them with us, even in their unfinished state:
...having lived in Latin America, I do have some feedback as to why Mexico has so much lower rate of imprisonment than Texas. Have you ever SEEN a Mexican prison? I can tell you for sure, it is NOT a comfortable place. Jails in Latin America are intended to be punishment, and they are ugly: dark, damp, with no heat or A/C, no blankets, no food unless your family brings it to you. There's a significant amount of police brutality as well, and it mostly gets ignored by authorities. This means no one - and I mean NO ONE - wants to go to jail. Living on the streets or in a a little cardboard shack in the city dump is preferable. I'm not saying American jails are pretty places, because I realize they aren't, but they don't have the same deterrent power that Mexican jails have.

Another question I wondered about was the percentage of illegal immigrants in Texas jails. How many of the people in jail in Texas (or elsewhere in America, for that matter) are citizens or legal residents? I could be wrong, but I'd be willing to bet a significant amount of our prison population is here illegally.

That said, I agree that something needs to be done. Restitution (maybe times four, as the Bible suggests), public service, maybe even house arrest, seem far more useful to most people than enforced idleness for months on end. Real consequences, enforced fairly quickly, would also be helpful (as opposed to our current system where a person may be free for months before receiving a guilty verdict and having to go to jail). And efforts to return those who have been jailed to a productive life are also critical. At the same time, moral and spiritual reform such as Prison Fellowship's Interchange Freedom Initiative are critical to bringing about real, internal change in the lives of prison inmates.

I'm going to keep thinking about these issues.


In the comments, Elizabeth B, who has a passion for phonics instruction, notes:
The Wall Street Journal article was the only one that mentioned literacy, and it only briefly mentioned it. 70% of prisoners are functionally illiterate.

Brunner's Book "Retarding America: The Imprisonment of Potential" explained how each $1.00 in phonics remediation saved $1.82, but no one has listened, his book was published in 1993. There are more blacks and hispanics who are illiterate, that is probably responsible for their higher imprisonment rates. (There have actually been good statistical studies that have proved causation, not just correlation, with literacy and crime.) Poor reading methods hurt minorities more because they don't have adults at home to correct the problem. Hispanics are more likely to have ESL issues, and blacks have a history of being denied the right to read, we started teaching reading poorly just as they were being afforded the opportunity to go to school en masse. (And prior to that, it was illegal for them to learn to read.)

Britain has a similar problem with literacy in their prisons (67% illiterate), they have a non-profit phonics remediation program going, the Toe by Toe prison project. (And they adopted the same bad reading methods around the same time. Hmmm....)
Prison Fellowship's faith based programs and phonics-based literacy programs are the only 2 interventions I know of that have actually reduced recidivism rates.

I worked as a statistician in the Air Force before I was promoted to mom. I have tutored remedial reading with phonics since 1994 and eventually hope to teach large groups of prisoners, however, my children are still young and grandparents are out of state, so the prisoners will have to wait a while for me. If anyone wants to go in the meantime, it's easy--I taught a 4th grader enough to teach anyone with the proper books (free old books with expired copyright!) in about an hour. She's helping her brother who got a few too many sight words.


It's interesting that they both mention Prison Fellowship.

Grits also has a post on a prison ministry group that focuses on juvenils in jail.

I am deeply troubled. While looking up a source for the recent reports that 1 in 100 Americans are in jail, I came across this post from Crooked Timber:
Here is Becky Pettit & Bruce Western’s (2004) ASR paper, with its frankly astonishing result that in the cohort born between 1965 and 1969, thirty percent of black men without a college education—and sixty percent of black men without a high school degree—had been incarcerated by 1999. Recent cohorts of black men were more likely to have prison records (22.4 percent) than military records (17.4 percent) or bachelor’s degrees (12.5 percent)


Here's the quote on the 1 in 100 incarcerated story
:
For the first time in the nation’s history, more than one in 100 American adults is behind bars, according to a new report.

Nationwide, the prison population grew by 25,000 last year, bringing it to almost 1.6 million. Another 723,000 people are in local jails. The number of American adults is about 230 million, meaning that one in every 99.1 adults is behind bars.

Incarceration rates are even higher for some groups. One in 36 Hispanic adults is behind bars, based on Justice Department figures for 2006. One in 15 black adults is, too, as is one in nine black men between the ages of 20 and 34.

The report, from the Pew Center on the States, also found that only one in 355 white women between the ages of 35 and 39 are behind bars but that one in 100 black women are.

The report’s methodology differed from that used by the Justice Department, which calculates the incarceration rate by using the total population rather than the adult population as the denominator. Using the department’s methodology, about one in 130 Americans is behind bars.


Add to that the story I read yesterday saying that 1 in 11 Americans are on food stamps, the depressing illiteracy rates (30 million Americans can't read, and this figure has been unchanged since 1992) even among the college educated population:
Only 41 percent of graduate students tested in 2003 could be classified as "proficient" in prose -- reading and understanding information in short texts -- down 10 percentage points since 1992. Of college graduates, only 31 percent were classified as proficient -- compared with 40 percent in 1992. Schneider said the results do not separate recent graduates from those who have been out of school several years or more.

The results were based on a sample of more than 19,000 people 16 or older, who were interviewed in their homes. They were asked to read prose, do math and find facts in documents. The scores for "intermediate" reading abilities went up for college students, causing educators to question whether most college instruction is offered at the intermediate level because students face reading challenges.


And I am deeply, deeply disturbed. But that's not really enough, is it? And I don't know what to do about it. I cannot shake the feeling that we are in the twilight of our civilization- if not dusk, and I want to wander the streets with a sign reading, "The end is near!"

Only few would be able to read it.

FLDS, July 30

Kurt has some very disturbing evidence that Judge Walthers and CPS head counsel Charles Childress did indeed have a private meeting without the presence of the AALs for the FLDS. He has an inside contact, and he asked that contact why exhibit A was removed from the ruling before it was sent out to opposing counsel. Here's the response:

A1: The judge removed the exhibit, after it [the motion?] was presented to her for signature. The CPS lead attorney indicated that attorneys had received a copy of the attachment. He also informed the court, after the confusion arose of “no attachment,” that he would send out a letter explaining the court’s reason for removing the exhibit.


The motion was physically filed on Thursday, but wasn't e-filed until late Friday afternoon. Kurt asked about that and was told:
A2: The motion was filed at approximately 11:00 am on the 21st in person and was walked directly up to the Judge for her consideration. The motion and signed order was not returned to the clerk until the following day . . .


There's more at Kurt's site- I don't want to steal his thunder, but this is pretty disturbing:
I believe it was walked up by Mr. Childress. Although I was not present, I understand that the exhibit was detached during the course of the judge reviewing the motion, exhibit and order, prior to signature.


Furthermore, Childress has promised to draft a letter to the opposing counsels to explain the Judge's reasoning for removing exhibit A. Kurt asks how Childress would be privy to such information if he hadn't had an ex parte meeting with Judge Walthers. Kurt asks some other excellent questions as well- I suggest y'all go read them and see what you think.

For those interested in more specifics ,this article from the Trib has the list of five men arrested and the dates their crimes are alleged to have occurred. For instance:
According to a search warrant used to collect DNA evidence from [Warren] Jeffs, a girl he married in 2004 gave birth in October 2005 when she was 15.
Raymond Merril Jessop, 36, is accused of assaulting a minor on or about Nov. 19, 2004 - which means the charge apparently is not related to his July 2006 marriage to Teresa Jeffs, the sect leader's daughter. She was 15 at the time.
That marriage, which took place at the Yearning For Zion Ranch in Eldorado, was detailed in court documents filed as part of dispute between Teresa Jeffs and her court-appointed attorney.
Teresa Jeffs has made two appearances as a witness before the grand jury and is set to appear again on Aug. 21.
Allen E. Keate's alleged sexual assault of a minor occurred on or about April 8, 2006. A bishop's record taken from the ranch and dated March 2007 said Keate, 56, had a "spiritual wife" who was 17 and a mother.


Just to be clear, in Texas, although it's legal to marry a 16 year old with the parents' permission and proper filing at the courthouse, and it's legal to marry a 14 year old if you get a Judge to okay it- it's sexual assault of a child to marry the same 16 year old 'spiritually' or bigamously, or without filing the proper paperwork at the courthouse. Texas no longer has a statutory rape charge- it's all sexual assault of a child. I'm only clarifying in case anybody thinks that the 'sexual assault of a child' charge means this isn't about marrying teens. I am not excusing the marriage of a 56 year old to a 15 or 16 year old, but yes, I do think there's a difference between that and tampering with a 9 year old.

Brooke thinks that rather than relying on testimony from the wives they are probably using evidence such as scrapbooks, letters, Bishop's records, and perhaps DNA, because:
...during the July grand jury hearing, each witness spent 10 to 20 minutes meeting with the panel in the morning session -- not long enough to answer more than the most basic questions. I am guessing they had little to say. Walther arrived at the courthouse at noon and some women were called before the judge again, this time accompanied by attorneys, later in the afternoon.

My take at the time was that some of the women were about to be charged with contempt. That did not happen.

All of the witnesses have been given summons to return in August. Why? Would that be necessary if the women had provided information used in this round of indictments? Are they linked to other men or information? Or is contempt lurking as a possibility?


She also quotes somebody called WWJD on why that person thinks that under-aged marriage cannot possibly be a mandate of the church. WWJD points out just how obedient and rigidly conformist the members of the group are, and says:
When Jeffs told men to leave their families they packed up and left their families. When he told women to pack up their children and be reassigned to another man they did just that. Pack up and move to the Texas scrub to toil at hard labor in the hot Texas sun and they did it.

The reason I'm hesitant to believe it is a mandate of the church to marry girls at 13, 14, or 15 rather than the independent act of some of the members is that if it were a mandate of the religion there would be no 'single' girls in that age group. The obedience is so rigid that all these girls would be married. That is not the case . . . there are some but the numbers seem to point to it being the exception rather than the rule.


-------------------------------

Updated: I'm taking the liberty of posting two opposing comments from this thread at the trib. Both are from commenters with a pretty decent track record of being civil and sensible- even when I disagree with one or the other, I generally admire their ability to engage in rational discourse. I'm reposting them here, because I think they each make some valid points on each side of the issue:

TexasTwist: 7/30/2008 7:18:00 AM

Another way to look at it...

Three of the five alleged offenses occurred when the old age parameters for a legal marriage were in effect. Those three girls were 16 at the time of the offenses and "could have" been married under the old statute (with prior written and filed parental consent).

Show me those legal marriages.

Of the two offenses that are said to have occurred after September 1, 2005, the alleged victim in one of the cases was 16 at the time. The 2005 change to the minimum age for a legal marriage with prior written and filed parental consent was from 14 to 16 so in effect, the age requirements for a legal marriage with that particular girl did not change.

That leaves the case where a 15-year-old is the alleged victim in an event that is said to have occurred after September 1, 2005.

The only way for there to have been a legal marriage with her after that date was for her to petition the court to permit the marriage.

Did that happen?

Why not challenge the validity of the statute at that time and in that manner?


Lilathe: 7/30/2008 7:18:00 AM


Until September 2005 the legal age to marry with parental consent for ANYONE was 14. They had parental consent, they "got married" occording to their own morals, the only thing they didn't do was get a piece of paper issued by the government.
Those two should be charged for failure to register a marriage.
Everything they did at that time was legal for anyone in Texas except the failure to register the marriage.

Every Texan was apparently "ok" with 14 year olds getting married prior to the FLDS moving here. As long as it was Baptists getting married at 14 everything was fine, just don't let those danged die hard Mormon's try to do it in our state.


Texas Twist responds that the piece of paper is:
Required in Texas for a marriage involving a person under 18 both prior to and after September 1, 2005.

Absent that "piece of paper", sexual contact with a person under the age of 17 in Texas becomes a criminal act.

Compelling state interest and a law of neutral applicability.


Lilathe says intent should also be an issue:
The intent of the law prior to 2005 was intended to stop predatory behavior of undesirable adult males but to leave the actual "marriage" decisions up to the parents and the couple involved.

The intent of the law AFTER 2005 was clearly to stop FLDS from practicing polygamy or from marrying below aged 16.

---------------

Updated again to add that Doran, in the comments, asks if there's any evidence that these all took place in Texas, particularly the 2004 cases- or if there might be marriages registered in some other county. I don't know. But it does make me even more intrigued by what Willie Jessop had to say about these arraignments:
Sect leader Willie Jessop, who is speaking for the group in Mr. Jeffs' absence, said he couldn't confirm whether the other men who surrendered would post bail, and said he wasn't at liberty to answer any more questions.

"I can't go on the record with anything right now – I'll explain later," said Mr. Jessop, who has called the charges outrageous. "When all of this comes out, you will be very amused and shocked."

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Distractions

Why do so many of us have our best thoughts and insights in the shower? Because we aren't doing any of those things in the shower...generally speaking.


Any of what things? The things mentioned here as things we use to distract us from what we should be doing.

YEs, Virginia, (FLDS)

Natalie did claim her client had a child:
June 2, 2008:


“The agreement would have given time for DNA testing to come back. That, she argues, was a critical component in her case because her client is a mother to a child in custody being cared for by another person. “Ad Litem requested that the court await the outcome of DNA results before entering an order so that a person entitled to possession could be properly identified for each infant in custody.”


In an exchange with Kurt at I Perceive, Natalie Malonis says she never told anybody that Teresa was an unwed mother- and I suppose she may be correct on a technicality, the word 'unwed' does not appear here.

Where is Exhibit A? Exhibit A is supposed to be an example of a Discovery Control Order that CPS suggested Walthers use as a model in her state of discovery. One source is telling Kurt that Walthers herself removed it before transmitting the motion and her ruling to the AALs for FLDS children and parents.

From the Trib: Warren Jeffs' defense attorney is seeking to have the last four charges facing him in Arizona dropped. Originally he faced ten. Two were dropped because the 'victim' refused to testify. Four were dropped because what he did doesn't meet the definition of the crime he was accused of. (he performed weddings between half cousins- people who shared one grandparent, but not both). About the remaining four:
Defense attorney Mike Piccarreta is arguing that Jeffs was denied a fair, impartial and unbiased grand jury, and that the prosecution presented false or misleading evidence to the grand jury.


I'm afraid I can't get that disturbing picture of Jeffs kissing the little girl in a must unfatherly fashion out of my head. So I don't feel much sympathy for him. But even though the mere thought of that photograph literally knots my stomach- I have to admit that the Elissa Wall case ought to trouble many of us for other reasons.

Jeffs is convicted of being an accomplice to rape because he performed the ceremony between 14 year old Elissa and her 19 year old half cousin, and later urged her to be true to her vows. I don't approve of 14 year old Elissa being married to her half cousin (or anybody). But.... the half cousin hasn't been tried. I don't think he's going to be. And he's the one who supposedly performed the act for which Jeffs is only convicted of being an accomplice. There is a real possibility that if Elissa's husband were tried for the crime, he would be acquitted. I understand Elissa herself doesn't want to testify against him. So what would that mean- how could you hold a man as an accomplice to a crime committed by a man who the state is afraid to charge because the fear is he might well be declared innocent?
----------------------

Bill at Free the FLDS has some new pictures for us- I love the one of the girls jumping on the trampoline. The boys singing by the fireplace is also sweet.

The El Dorado Success is reporting that Dr. Barlow has posted his bail and has been released. The other four men remain in jail.

I meant to mention this yesterday- these five men turned themselves in, after the FLDS spent a week trying to convince authorities that they would do this in only the authorities would tell them who the five men indicted were. Once they knew, these five men turned themselves in. Yet nearly every paper but one reported the story as "Five More FLDS Men Arrested."
First off, I am not sure what the 'more' was about. Warren? HE was arrested two years ago in another state. Secondly, this was more playing for public sympathies. Brooke Adams- reporter at the only paper that got the headline right (Five FLDS MEn TURN THEMSELVES IN)- has the press release that DA Abbott wanted the papers to use- after listing each man, the charges, and the possible sentences, Abbott says:

''Today's arrests reflect a nearly week-long effort by the Texas Rangers and the Texas Attorney General's Office to arrange for the defendants' arrest.

''The charges against these defendants resulted from a cooperative effort between the Texas Attorney General's Office, Texas Department of Public Safety, the Texas Rangers, the Schleicher County Sheriff̢۪s Department, 51st Judicial District Attorney Steve Lupton, and the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, Richard B. Roper.''


That weeklong effort should also credit the FLDS themselves, who have said all along they would turn themselves in once they knew who had been indicted.

And this is as good a place as any to read this important message about guarding your fifth amendment rights.

Brave New Schools

I'll be honest- I had a preconceived idea about this story, and it was not one favorable to the Christian schools. But I changed my mind, pending confirmation of the section of the article that I've emphasized below:



Arguments were heard today in a federal district court case to determine whether a state university system can dictate that private Christian schools in the state teach their college prep courses from exclusively secular, Bible- and God-free textbooks.

As WND reported earlier, the University of California system adopted a policy last year that basic science, history, and literature textbooks by major Christian book publishers wouldn't qualify for core admissions requirements because of the inclusion of Christian perspectives.[...]

"Essentially what's happening is the UC has to pre-approve courses taught in high school," Tyler said. "It's pretty shocking, because in depositions UC reps made it clear: whether it be English, history or science, the addition of a religious viewpoint makes it unacceptable."
[...]



Under the admissions guidelines to University of California colleges, in-state students must either score in the top two to three percent on standardized tests or complete a core curriculum of approved preparatory classes (called "a-g" classes) to be deemed eligible for entrance into the state university system.

According to the lawsuit, more than 90 percent of UC students achieved eligibility by completing an approved a-g curriculum.

Under the disputed policy, however, a-g classes based on books that mention God or the Bible don't count, effectively making a secular education a prerequisite for admission.

After reviewing textbooks from major Christian publishers Bob Jones University Press and A Beka Book, UC officials deemed them insufficient, specifically because the books supplemented the basic material with a Christian perspective.

Burt Carney, an executive with the Association of Christian Schools International, said he's met with officials for the university system, and was told that there was no problem with the actual facts in a BJU physics textbook that was disallowed.

In fact, an ACSI report said, UC officials confirmed "that if the Scripture verses that begin each chapter were removed the textbook would likely be approved …"


"Here's the very university that talks about academic freedom," Carney said. "It's very discriminating. They don't rule against Muslim or Hindu or Jewish (themes) or so forth, only those with a definite Christian theme."

According to the lawsuit, a variety of textbooks with supplemental perspectives were accepted – just not those with a Christian perspective.

For example, "Western Civilization: The Jewish Experience" and "Issues in African History" were accepted, but "Christianity's Influence on American History" was rejected. "Feminine Roles in Literature," "Gender, Sexuality, and Identity in Literature" and "Literature of Dissent" were accepted, but "Christianity and Morality in American Literature" was not.

Most strikingly, "Intro to Buddhism," "Introduction to Jewish Thought," "Women's Studies & Feminism" and "Raza Studies" were deemed acceptable electives, but "Special Providence: American Government" was unacceptable, both as a civics and elective course.

"In other words, (UC schools) routinely approve courses which add viewpoints such as non-Christian religion, feminism, an ethnic preference, a political viewpoint, or multiculturalism, or that focus on religions such as Buddhism or Judaism, (and plaintiffs believe they should evenhandedly approve such courses), but disapprove courses which add viewpoints based on conservative Christianity," the court filings said.


Read the rest. It seems to me that if students can pas the entrance tests or score well enough on the SATs, it shouldn't matter to any state college whether or not their high school textbooks included Bible verses. They should not even be able to ask.e

Scrabulous Is Gone

For those users on Facebook who have been playing the word games, Scrabble came out with their own version. The Brothers Judd liked it better.

I downloaded it and nearly gave myself a concussion slamming my head against the wall- which was a more pleasant experience than playing Scrabble at Facebook.

Scrabulous was smooth, simply, elegant- and the focus was on the game.

Scrabble is head-ache inducing, epileptic fit triggering, clunky, dysfunctional, and the focus is on gimmicks, lights, bells, whistles and animation that is distracting and actually hinders play. They did not have a single feature that was an improvement on Scrabulous- and most of their features were, at best, aggravating. And sadly, that's the mess Facebook is keeping:

eldavojohn writes "Sometime this morning, Facebook shut down Scrabulous to American and Canadian users. Scrabulous, we hardly knew ye." This is sadly unsurprising, now that Hasbro's finally taken legal action against the developers, after quite a few months of letting it go unmolested. Seems like they waited until there was an official Scrabble client available (also on Facebook), while the snappy and fuller-featured Scrabulous kept people interested in a 60-year-old board game. The official client, which is at least labeled a beta, is a disappointment. This is not a Google-style beta release, note: it's slow to load, confusing, and doesn't even offer the SOWPODS word list as an option, only the Tournament Word List and a list based on the Merriam-Webster dictionary. (Too bad that SOWPODS is the word list used in most of the world's English-speaking countries.) It also took several minutes to open a game, rather than the few seconds (at most) that Scrabulous took — it's pretty impressive, but not in a good way, that the programmers could extract that sort of performance from the combination of Facebook's servers and my dual-core, 2GHz+ laptop. The new Scrabble client has doodads like 3D flipping-tile animations, too, but no clear way to actually initiate the sample game that jamie and I have attempted to start. I hope that once we get past that obvious hurdle, we'll find there's a chat interface and game notebook as in Scrabulous, but my hopes are low.


It is my considered opinion that the dudes who designed this Online Scrabble game do not actually like word games, and they have a pathological need to punish those of us who actually play them. It's that annoying to play.

Food Prices

My husband and I were recently going over the family budget, and he was expressing some puzzlement. Why, he wanted to know, were things so much tighter this year than last year, when he was making more money than he did last year?

Two reasons- one is that while he got a nice raise, and an even nicer gas card to go with the company truck he uses now, we lost ten thousand a year when we were forced to sell a chunk of the farm property and our renters weren't paying their rent. Of course, if gas prices keep going up, pretty soon that gas card will amount to ten thousand a year, won't it?

The second reason is rising food costs. Last year I could go to the day old bread store and get organic, whole wheat, flax seed bread for 80 or 90 cents a loaf. Last week I went to the bread store and it was 1.19 a loaf. The bagels I used to get for .49 are now .89.

I hope the formatting on this table stays readable:

Soaring food prices
The price of many foods has spiked in the past year
Food | Price | 1-year change
Bananas (per lb.) | $0.597 | 17.1%
Bread (per lb.)| 1.350 | 16.3
Chicken breast (per lb.)| 2.377 | 6.0
Dried beans (per lb.) | 1.059 | 21.6
Eggs (per doz.) | 2.203 | 34.8
Flour (per lb.)| 0.489 | 37.0
Milk (per gal.)| 3.781 | 23.1
Pasta (per lb.) | 1.079 | 18.6


Dried beans, pasta, and flour, milk and eggs are staples in a frugal diet- and look at how much they've gone up. Ouch.

The news story that accompanies that table highlights the plight of one younger mother trying to make it on her food stamp allotment:
For Phyllis Bean, higher food prices mean going hungry so her 4-month-old baby girl can eat.

The Washington resident's $280 monthly food stamp allotment doesn't last very long these days, even though she gets a free lunch at a culinary training program at D.C. Central Kitchen. By mid-month, Bean is often reduced to eating canned ravioli and peanut butter and jelly so she can afford to buy milk and baby cereal for McKiya. By month's end, her refrigerator is empty.

"When I go to the counter, I have to put some of my food back so I can get her food," said Bean, 21, who also receives $65 a month from a federal program available to women with young children. "I try to buy less meats and more starchy food that will last me - noodles, ravioli, rice, peanut butter and jelly."


My heart aches for that young mother. She's living in one of the most expensive cities in the country. She's trying to better her conditions by pursuing job training, and she's putting her baby's needs first. I'm surprised, however, that the baby's cereal and milk are not covered by WIC. I wonder if the reporter asked about that. I wonder if Bean or the reporter know about WIC.

I wish I could tell her she doesn't need baby cereal. She could make her own using oats and a blender. Other frugal baby foods:

Wait longer to introduce solids- four months is pretty young.

When you do add solids, you can use table food such as cooked carrots, squash, potatoes, sweet potatoes, green beans, apples, pears, peaches, and other fruits and vegetables from your own diet.
Just mash them a bit with a fork before you add seasonings. You can also cook some in advance, freeze them in an ice cube tray, and then pop the cubes out and put them in a ziplock bag in the freezer for individual servings. Corn and most other grains should be last.

Avocado and banana are easily mashed without cooking, of course, although Avocados aren't very frugal.

Tofu comes soft enough for the baby to eat- just watch for gassiness.

Plain, canned pumpkin is also a great convenience food for babies, and it's about 1/4 the price of an equivalent amount of baby food in a jar. Make sure you get the plain canned pumpkin and not pumpkin pie mix. Canned green beans (no salt added) are also an easy and frugal baby food.

Egg whites are implicated in allergies, but it was my understanding at the time that egg yolk, mashed and thinned with a bit of breastmilk, was acceptable. This food also is a good source of iron.

If you want to feed babies foods that are not so easily mashed with a fork, a manual baby food grinder is a cheap and easy solution, usually about ten dollars, I think. And yes, I do know that there are times when ten dollars is as out of reach as a hundred. But if you are looking for something to do to help somebody else, a baby food grinder is something to keep in mind. It might make a nice shower gift along with a few small freezer containers and a few easy instructions on how to use it.

For 'baby' oatmeal, just grind the regular oats in a blender before cooking them as usual- OR cook them soft and mushy.

So my sympathies are engaged, but my sympathies are the sort that want to teach a person to fish, not help them sign up for increased fish benefits every month. Others feel differently:

To alleviate the crunch on the nation's roughly 28 million people on food stamps, advocates are calling for Congress to pass a temporary mid-year boost in benefits. They are also fighting for changes in how the monthly allotment is computed to make it better reflect the expenses of today's recipients.

"It's been very tough for families," said Stacy Dean, director of food assistance policy for the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal-leaning think tank. "They don't have the flexibility in their budgets so they just don't buy as much food or they buy cheap food or they skip meals altogether. Congress can and should act to help people survive the spike in prices."


According to the article, 1 in 11 Americans receive food stamps- that's almost as many as are incarcerated, isn't it? In D.C. it's one in seven on food stamps.

Households receive an average of about $1 per person per meal. Individuals' payments are capped at $162 a month while a family of four can get a maximum of $542 a month.


The article contains this frustrating piece of information:
"Over time, the increase in food stamp benefit...does keep up with rate of inflation," said Kate Houston, deputy undersecretary at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which runs the food program. "The maximum benefits and the benefits that individuals receive are designed to supplement the food budgets and they do keep up with food prices."

Acknowledging that the rise in food costs may be tough on some people, Houston said recipients can find recipes and suggestions on the agency's Web site on how to make their food dollars go further.

It's frustrating, because there is no link, and I could not find any such information on the agency's web site until the end of a tedious 45 minutes search. Then I got this. I don't know how helpful it is.

At any rate, with the rapid increases in food costs over the last few months, the reporter writing the article says that many people she interviewed were having to make 'drastic' changes in how they shopped.

Sylvia Ford is one of them. The $135 she gets each month lasts two weeks, leaving her dependent on food banks such as Bread for the City. A year ago, the single mother of four grown children could afford lemons. Now it's only lemon juice. Gone are the occasional treats of shrimp or crabmeat. Instead it's stews or soups that she can string out over several days.

"I'm just trying to stretch it more," said Ford, 55, who is unemployed but volunteers at the food bank. "I have to come here to get a bag of food to make ends meet."


Crab meat? See, right there my sympathies just evaporated faster than a drop of water on a hot skillet. And we almost NEVER buy lemons- it's always been lemon juice for our family. So this is not a persuasive argument to me for why Sylvia Ford needs a rise in her food stamp allotment.

And every time I write anything like this, I get hostile criticism about being mean and judgemental- which always amuses me, because of course, you can't say stuff like that without being, wait for it, kind of mean and judgmental. And not one of my critics can ever give me a good, sound, convincing reason why I should not be sympathetic that this poor unemployed woman can no longer buy crab meat with the money she gets from taxpaying citizens like me who- wait for it- do not buy crab meat because we can't afford it.

This is more persuasive:
The maximum food stamp benefit no longer covers the cost of the "thrifty food plan," the menu of food items the government uses to calculate its allotment. In March, it cost $567.20 to buy the items in the plan for a family of four, compared to $542.10 last June, when the inflation adjustment was set.

But I'd like to see that 'thrifty food plan.'

The solution some politicians and activists want to see is a 15 percent increase in the food stamp allotment, effective almost immediately after they vote on it. And that would certainly provide some immediate relief. But when 1 in 11 Americans is on food stamps, it seems to me our problems call for some better, long term solutions.

Good Nights; Good Life

Incidentally, speaking of Blogher Ads, I was totally tickled when, once we completed all our paperwork, the very first ad was for Good Nights. I promise I won't do this often, perhaps ever- I realize not every product that comes through the BlogHer Ads will be something I use or even know about.

But Good Nights? I love those people. Seriously. I wrote this about them in February of 2007 where I was talking about the 'non-frugal' things we buy:

Good Nights- disposable overnight 'pull-ups.' Cloth diapering is certainly cheaper, and I have done cloth before. However, I have a 19 year old child who still needs diapering at night and who is accident prone in the day and I really, really, do not want to do cloth diapers on an adult. I love the Good Nights company and have written them fan mail because they make a product that fits children up to, I think, 100 pounds. I've tried adult diapers, and they were much more troublesome to use, so much more that I can't even begin to tell you how troublesome. The Cherub is small for her age, so Good Nights work for her, and I cannot tell you how grateful I am for this. I have probably mentioned this before although it's not the sort of thing I would ordinarily talk about on a family blog, but let me just say that the Cherub has the mental development of a slow two year old, but she has the physical development of any other woman, and once a month I say a special prayer asking the Lord to bless, bless, bless the good people at the Good Nights company who made a product that fits her. It makes what could be a horrendously messy and demoralizing task simple and doable. Lately we've found a generic product in the same size at Walgreens and CVS, and they work just as well, but if not for the Good Nights company, the generic brands would never have realized there was a market for this size. Have I told you how much I love the Good Nights people?


The Cherub is now 21 (spring birthday)- and I still feel just the same. I sometimes get a lump in my throat thinking about how much easier this product has made our lives.
Permit me to be real, raw, and gritty here about life with a severely disabled girl-child. If you're squeamish, go away now.

When we adopted the Cherub we were told that when she reached puberty, we'd probably just want to go ahead and have her scheduled for a full hysterectomy- that's what other parents of kids like her did. I was appalled.

Well, that was many years and quite a few experiences ago, and frankly, I was a judgmental ignoramus- Yes, it is a drastic step, and we do not plan to ever take it. I hope it's not a step we would take even if circumstances were different- but I will never again pass judgment on somebody else who feels that would be the best option in their circumstances.

I had no idea, and probably neither do you, what it would be like to deal with a PMSing, in pain, messy 2 year old in an adult woman's body month after month for years, as we grew older ourselves. In our case, thanks the Cherub's sweet nature, small stature, and the blessing of the larger sized Good Nights which appeared on the market just a few months after we needed them, in addition to several helpful daughters, I still don't have a full idea of what that would be like, for which I am grateful- both to God for giving our Cherub a sweet nature and small stature, and to our very helpful daughters, and to the folks at Good Night who developed such a life saving product.

They made a nearly unbearable part of our lives bearable.

Deja Vu

All over again....

Those of you who read through a newsfeeder are probably seeing double- posts you've already read (or deliberately skipped reading) showing up again in a most annoying fashion. What's up with that?

My fault- so sorry. I'm trying to solve the dropping side-bar issue. According to Bloglines less than thorough FAQ, this could be because of long links in posts. So I went through all the posts up for today and resized the links using TinyURL.com. This is a very cool little tool. I've used shorterlink.com before, and it's also handy, but TinyURL automagically inserts the new, shorter URL into my clipboard so that it saves several steps when it comes to replacing the long URL with the shortcut.

It will reduce a 75 letter link down to 25 letters- or you can customize- so that the link to The Common Room can be:

http://tinyurl.com/CommonRoom

Or, if you're feeling flippant, you could do something silly, like name the Blue Heron Pip saw recently Mrs. McGillicuddy and then use that in the URL:
http://tinyurl.com/MrsMcGillicuddy

Why Mrs. McGillicuddy? Well, because Gertrude, Matilda, and Hermione were already taken.

Why does it matter? We're now getting Blogher Ads, and I've noticed that when my sidebar drops, so do my stats- because the stat counters are lower on the page they take longer to load up in some cases. And frankly, I could use the egg money from ads (or any other source)- we have a wedding coming up, and I have a book habit to support.=)

Plus- it's annoying. The left sidebar is supposed to be a sidebar, not an expanse of empty space. And I still don't think I fixed it, and I don't know what to do next.

Woman Delivers 18th Child

The story is here, and see if the same thing strikes you as it did me...

Is it that they are Romanian immigrants living in Canada?

Nope.

She's 44 and just had her 18th child?

Nope.

Is it this statement by the father:

"We never planned how many children to have. We just let God guide our lives, you know, because we strongly believe life comes from God and that's the reason we did not stop the life," said Alexandru Ionce.


No, but you're getting warmer. It's the sort of clueless question the reporter apparently asked, given the father's statement above:
Ionce said he did not know if the couple would have more children. The family now has 10 girls and eight boys.


What part of 'We never planned... we just let God guide our lives....that's the reason we did not stop the life...' did this reporter not grasp?

Other than all of it, I mean.

Do You Think They'd Notice....

The HG reports from the trenches, where she is nannying for 10 children while the mama is in the hospital recovering from a C-section and baby 11 is in the NICU practicing breathing:


* Preparing a simple lunch today (tuna salad, sliced carrots, sliced apples) took an hour because of interruptions.
Quad D. fell and hit his head, so I picked him to comfort him. As I was snuggling and talking to him, Quad A. came running and saying something in his Very High Pitched and Squeaky and Hard to Understand Voice (mother, I think he could have given the Equuschick a run for her money). I did understand the gist: he was tattling on Quad C. So I went to find Quad C, and found him engaged in coloring on a wooden cabinet with a purple glue stick. I let forth a groan of annoyance, got Brother H to help Quad C clean it up, and then sat down in the living room to continue hugging Quad D, who was still crying.
That's when T. (the 5 yo old going on 50) came up to me and said, "Is this worse than you thought it would be?"
"Is what worse?" I asked.
"Being here. Is it worse than you thought it would be?"


So, to continue the question I began to ask in the title to the post- do you think they'd notice if she sneaked him out in her luggage and brought him home with her when she comes back?

Yeah, I'm afraid they would, too.

Monday, July 28, 2008

FIve FLDS Men Arrested

I thought I posted this almost an hour ago- when it was 'breaking ' news. I did. Only I posted it to a private blog that most of y'all can't read.

ooops. Here it is:

A state law enforcement official says five indicted members of a polygamist sect in West Texas have turned themselves in to authorities.
The official, who spoke on a condition of anonymity, was not authorized to talk on the record until after a news conference by Attorney General Greg Abbott later Monday.


Texas claims DNA evidence was used to link some of these men with the children of mothers who had those children in their teens:
Three of the men — Leroy Jessop, 33; Raymond Jessop, 36; and Allan Keate, 56 — face charges of sexual assault of a child and are purported to be “spiritual husbands” of young women who testified before the Schleicher County grand jury. A fourth man, Michael Emack, 57, also faces charges of sexual assault of a child. The fifth man, Dr. Lloyd Barlow, 38, faces three misdemeanor counts of failing to report child abuse. He’s purported to be the chief physician at the sect's compound outside Eldorado and is thought to have had information about young mothers there.

Leroy Jessop is also charged with bigamy.


So that's:
Warren Jeffs- already in jail, and DA Abbott says he wants him extradited to Texas.
Leroy Jessop, 33 — Sexual Assault of a Child and Felony Bigamy
Raymond Jessop, 36 — Sexual Assault of a Child
Allan Keate, 56 — Sexual Assault of a Child
Michael Emack, 57 — Sexual Assault of a Child

And Barlow on 3 misdemeanors.
-----------------------------

Here are pictures of the six FLDS men (including Warren Jeffs)

Perspective and Charity

Last year the Equuschick, writing about her amusing adventures with her sister, a good friend, and stranded con-artist at the airport, wrote:

However, there comes a time when a decent sense of perspective demands not that we look at how a person arrived in a situation, but rather, the situation that a person is in now.


And, although subsequent events proved that particularly helpless soul was not quite so lacking in resources as she implied, I am still proud of the EC and company for acting as they did.

And it is true that there are times it doesn't much matter how a person got to be in any given predicament, there is an immediate need to help. But there are other times when it behooves us to ask certain questions, collect information, and use more judicious wisdom than tender mushiness in reaching a conclusion.

The HG, EC and I discussed those events at the airport after the fact and came up with a few ideas for how things might be handled next time. And while I am proud of what they did this time, if they handled the next such instance the exact same way, I would be less proud. For instance, there was a blizzard swooping in and they lacked time to discuss solutions or to take some other steps that might have been appropriate in less hostile weather and less of a time crunch. They also were missing a vital piece of information (the UBO had not been on the plane with their friend Susan as they thought), and because the UBO never left them alone for a moment, they could not exchange information comfortably. Well brought up young ladies, they have been taught it is rude to whisper (unless it is to annoy Shasta) in front of others. However, they now realized that in another such predicament, a genuinely in distress person could not take offense at a polite request to 'excuse us for a moment, please, while we discuss our options.'

Or allow me another example, closer to home. Nearly 18 months ago I met a young single mother on Sunday night, and on Monday she was asking if we could keep her toddler and I could go with her to the hospital to hold her hand while she had her baby. I knew enough about her circumstances to know there wasn't anybody else, and her alternative for the toddler was a local woman's shelter, so we agreed. We also brought her home with us to recover after the baby was born.
However, while I would have liked very much to offer to let her stay longer than two weeks, I also knew enough about certain things to realize that without firm boundaries, there was a good possibility she would never leave, and never make an effort to take responsibility for herself and her situation, from the mundane (such as changing her own child's diapers, something she is loathe to do when here) to the more serious issues of guarding her cell phone use and eating home-cooked meals more than McDonald's or pursuing some means of self-support. So we did not make that the open ended invitation we would have liked. Subsequent events have shown us that we were quite right. We took care of some immediate needs, have remained available for emergencies (we kept the children when she had surgery) and had them over from time to time (holidays in particular), and we called the shelter to ask more questions, and we talked with her at length to gain enough information so that what help we offer can be help rather than co-dependency.

Because sometimes, if we don't consider how a person got in the predicament they are in, we are participating in making sure that they remain in a constant state of emergency by the sort of help we offer now.

Which brings us to Ethiopia and this article:
We did more in Ethiopia a quarter of a century ago than just rescue children from terrible death through starvation: we also saved an evil, misogynistic and dysfunctional social system. Presuming that half the existing population (say, 17 million) of the mid 1980s is now dead through non-famine causes, the total added population from that time is some 60 million, around half of them female.


Do I know what the answer is? No, I don't. DO I think then, that we should permit these children to die to save them from more horrible deaths ten years from now (the article explains just what sort of horrible deaths, but this is a family blog when I can help it).
No. But surely there is more to be done here than throw rice at the problem. Just over 20 years ago, reporters chose not to investigate or report on those pesky questions of 'how Ethiopia got here, and that blind spot- a very deliberate one in many cases, may just be a contributing factor in why millions more children may be in the same predicament now, as Kevin Myers explains:

I am not innocent in all this. The people of Ireland remained in ignorance of the reality of Africa because of cowardly journalists like me. When I went to Ethiopia just over 20 years ago, I saw many things I never reported -- such as the menacing effect of gangs of young men with Kalashnikovs everywhere, while women did all the work. In the very middle of starvation and death, men spent their time drinking the local hooch in the boonabate shebeens. Alongside the boonabates were shanty-brothels, to which drinkers would casually repair, to briefly relieve themselves in the scarred orifice of some wretched prostitute (whom God preserve and protect). I saw all this and did not report it, nor the anger of the Irish aid workers at the sexual incontinence and fecklessness of Ethiopian men. Why? Because I wanted to write much-acclaimed, tear-jerkingly purple prose about wide-eyed, fly-infested children -- not cold, unpopular and even "racist" accusations about African male culpability.


I don't agree with everything Myers says. Some of it smacks of Malthusian. But we shouldn't be afraid of what he has to say, and the fact that the response of some is to be offended and others to try to have him jailed indicates they have no better argument.

CAn a Family of Four Eat on $100 a Week

I know. It made me laugh, too. More here.

Snack Food

Neo-Neocon writes about one of my favorite Chinese foods- and I haven't been able to have one in about five years. We can't find them anywhere near us.

She links to a recipe as well- and I just bought the red bean paste for the filling last week, hoping to try to make them. I'll have to go back to get the right sort of flour, however.

I Love to Laugh

Serious stuff:

Obama's speech in Berlin


Hyscience has a bit more on Obama's little mentioned desire for a 'Civilian Security Force.

Byron York says it's really, really okay to laugh, even though the press says otherwise:

And this was about a man who made up his own pretend presidential seal and motto, Vero Possumus; a man who, upon securing the Democratic nomination, said, “I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal”; a man who has on a number of occasions seemed to forget that he is not, or at least not yet, the President of the United States, who has misstated the number of states in his own country, who has forgotten on which committees he serves in the U.S. Senate. Professional comedians — and their audiences — couldn’t find anything funny about any of that?
(there are some rude and not very family friendly bits in that article)

Gerard Baker takes a swing at it
:
And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness.

The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow.
[...]
In the great Battles of Caucus and Primary he smote the conniving Hillary, wife of the deposed King Bill the Priapic and their barbarian hordes of Working Class Whites.

And so it was, in the fullness of time, before the harvest month of the appointed year, the Child ventured forth - for the first time - to bring the light unto all the world.

He travelled fleet of foot and light of camel, with a small retinue that consisted only of his loyal disciples from the tribe of the Media.

Funny stuff. Irreverent, but funny. And it is true that the tribe of the Media is an easier target than Obama.

And maybe it's wrong to laugh at some of his gaffes and over the top statements. I mean, after all, the man doesn't even sweat!

(Updated to replace last link with one that works and doesn't have offensive pics- Thanks, Emily)

From the Hoover Archives

Here's a small taste of an interesting read:

It is not an accident that communism, wherever it has strongly established itself, has always restricted international travel, stirred up spy-mania, and jammed foreign radio stations. Where the USSR led, the People’s Republic of China and Cuba followed. And their example was picked up by North Vietnam, Cambodia, and Ethiopia. Communist leaderships in power repeatedly clamped down on the free flow of information in their countries and used propaganda to indoctrinate whole populations. Official media claimed that poverty and oppression were the universal features of life under capitalism; that capitalism was entering a period of terminal decline; and that the future, the brightest of futures, lay with communism. This was the uniform message of communist propagandists from October 1917 to the end of the twentieth century.

Consequently, when Gorbachev and his fellow reformers made their first trips to the West, they were in for a tremendous shock. Most of them had thought communism, suitably reformed, was a superior form of society to any that existed. One of the initiatives taken by the Hoover Archives after the dismantling of the USSR in 1991 was a series of extensive interviews with Soviet and American politicians who had played a part in ending the Cold War. The remarks of V. A. Aleksandrov come to mind here.

Aleksandrov was an experienced functionary of high rank who had met plenty of Americans in the course of his work. But years after he had seen President Ronald Reagan for the first time he still trembled at the impression. It was not Reagan’s words or policies that grabbed Alek-sandrov’s attention but his manners. The day in question called for an umbrella. As the president and his wife walked in the open air, the president held one aloft to shelter her from the rain. Aleksandrov recalled his own astonishment. Soviet political wives were meant to avoid the limelight; the task of sheltering them was supposed to be discharged by some nearby lackey. For Aleksandrov, Reagan’s behavior was chivalrous in the extreme—an example of an ease of social conduct that Aleksandrov was to witness on several other occasions as he became acquainted with the United States.

The Disappearance of the Slip

Also a link from my friend in Texas:

When did we give the slip the slip? Once de rigueur, slips have disappeared from our culture to such an extent that when I put in a call to designer Nanette Lepore about them, she told an assistant, "I have never worn a slip in my life."


For those who want them, you can make do. I choose skirts for half slips from among the skirts at the thrift shop- full, thin, gauzy skirts with elastic waistbands make great slips for the full skirts I favor.

Designer Vegetable Gardens

My dear friend in Texas sent me this link. It's sure a far cry from my five gallon buckets with a plant in each one....

Rick Norling spent $10,000 to have a vegetable garden created on his property in Rancho Santa Fe, Calif., earlier this year. He turned to the elegant gardens at the French palace of Versailles to help inspire the plan that he and his designer put together. It features raised beds of haricot vert, squash and 12 varieties of heirloom tomatoes. But Mr. Norling, who is known for wowing dinner guests by drizzling truffle oil over homegrown lettuce, doesn't toil in the dirt every weekend. Before a recent three-week trip to China with his wife, Mr. Norling, the chief executive of the nonprofit-hospital alliance Premier, invited his landscaper to harvest the vegetables and eat them himself. "He thought it was real heaven," he says.

At Garden of Ideas, a landscape-design firm in Ridgefield, Conn., owner Joe Keller says he recently completed a $60,000 garden at a weekend house in North Salem, N.Y. Mr. Keller says he tends the plots during the week, and the stable workers who care for the owner's horses often get the vegetables.


One lady requested a designer garden for her 50th birthday, and she got a landscaped gem for 70,000 dollars.

Honey....?

Interviews with Sheriff Doran, Review

Interview with Sheriff Doran, Apr 17 14:52
From the Eldorado Success....
I first found this posted here- but they removed the interview at some time. I don't know when or why. I posted excerpts from it here and also here.

However, since the original (found at an exmormon site which has removed several FLDS related threads) is now gone, I'm reposting the entire interview, which I found here using Google. (updated to correct this- I must have had an old link still in my clipboard- the interview is here.)

In case you missed the comments on this interview over the weekend, Shari Thomas pointed out,

"I just shared this with my retired cop roommate, who at one time served as an Acting Chief of Police for a resort community.

We've had long discussions on the "validity" and "probable cause" for the search.

She shook her head in disbelief that [Sheriff] Doran would be so ..... as to admit there was no real "probable cause" without the help of CPS and the phony call for help."

She also shared this link to another interview from June 4th, and says she'll be looking carefully
to see if it's possible we can catch him in a "lapse of memory" or a "spin doctoring".

One difference is that in the first interview he only claims one informant, and makes it quite clear the informant was never at the ranch. In the June 4th interview, this morphs into 'several' informants, and he downplays the importance of their information- although the search warrant was granted in part on the basis of Ranger Long's assertion that this informant *verified* that that the beds in the temple were used by adult men for illicit relations with under-aged girls- that's a pretty specific allegation for some vague informants who had never been to the ranch at all.
You can read more about the discrepancies I found in his two interviews in this post of June 4th.
Doran Williams said:
"...there are several things in the interview which are potentially toxic to the State's criminal case.

I suspect Mr. Mankin took the interview down from his site, because he has come to understand how bad it is for the State.

I am getting the impression from things like this that the Texas Rangers and the AG are going to make the Sheriff the scape goat for their looming disaster. "


So, here's the earliest interview from Sheriff Doran in full- compare what he said then to what we now know. It's not looking very good for him- and I hope the AAL for the children have access to this interview and know how to make use of it.

Texas law enforcement officers made entry on the YFZ Ranch Thursday, April 3, 2008 at the request of Texas Child Protective Services. The resulting raid spanned six days and ended with 416 children being removed from the ranch by CPS workers. Schleicher County Sheriff David Doran is the first law enforcement officer to speak at length about the raid. The following interview was conducted late Monday evening in his office at the Schleicher County Law Enforcement Center.

Randy Mankin: First of all, thank you for agreeing to this interview.

Sheriff Doran: You’re welcome. Remember I told you that you would be the first one I spoke with?

Mankin: Yes, and I appreciate it. I guess my first question is why now?

Doran: Well, there’s been a lot of speculation and some down right erroneous information bouncing around in the media. I checked with several of my law enforcement colleagues and we all agreed that the time was right to set the record straight...at least to the extent that we can. There’s still a lot that I cannot and will not comment on.

Mankin: Fair enough. Let’s start by talking about the four years leading up to the raid.

Doran: Well, you know what it was like when we first learned about the YFZ, the news media swarmed into town and the next thing I know I’m standing in front of a bunch of microphones and TV cameras. It was not easy.

Mankin: You’ve clearly gotten better at handling the media.

Doran: Only because I had to, but I still don’t enjoy it.

Mankin: You went to the YFZ Ranch that first day, didn’t you.

Doran: Yes, Chief Deputy Arispe and I went out there and told them that their cover story about being a hunting retreat had been exposed as a lie and that the national media was coming to town.

Mankin: Who did the people at the YFZ Ranch turn out to be?

Doran: They were members of the FLDS Church and followers of prophet Warren Jeffs.

Mankin: FLDS stands for?

Doran: Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints. They are an offshoot of the mainstream Mormon Church.

Mankin: And what is the primary difference between the FLDS Church and the LDS Mormons?

Doran: Polygamy. The FLDS church believes that plural marriage is fundamental to their faith and they refuse to compromise on it.

Mankin : How many times had you been on the Y F Z R a n c h over the past four years.

Doran:I don’t know exactly.... I’d just say that I’ve been there many times.

Mankin: What was the reason for all of those trips?

Doran: There was no one reason, but I’d say that my main goal was to develop an open dialog and a level of understanding. I wanted to be able to talk with them in case something happened.

Mankin: You mean something like what happened last week?

Doran: Yeah...that’s right.

Mankin: You also made a few trips out west didn’t you?

Doran: Yes, but before that Sheriff Kirk Smith of Washington County, Utah came here to brief me and bring us up to speed on his dealings with the FLDS community in Hildale, Utah and Colorado City, Arizona.

Doran: Well that’s what the town was originally called and that’s what the natives still call it. The place is really one town that sits on the Utah and Arizona border.

Mankin: How many trips did you make to Short Creek?

Doran: I don’t know, four or five, maybe six.

Mankin: And, what did you learn there?

Doran: I learned that in a lot of ways the people there are just like us. They love their families and they want to make their town a better place to live.

Mankin: Anything else?

Doran: Yes, I also learned that most of them are blindly loyal to their prophet, Warren Jeffs. But I did make a lot of contacts there, a few of which would be of great assistance.

Mankin: Warren Jeffs, now there’s a name we have all heard before.

Doran: We sure have. I think the whole world has heard of Warren Jeffs by now.

Mankin: Thinking back to when Warren Jeffs was on the run, you kept telling people he would be caught in a traffic stop.

Doran: And he was!

Mankin: You seem to enjoy that part.

Doran: It’s just that I was pressured by some people to stage a raid on the YFZ Ranch in order to apprehend him when I didn’t even know if he was there and had no probable cause to get a warrant.

Mankin: Okay, let’s talk for a minute about probable cause. What was it about the raid that started on April 3rd that was different?

Doran: Well, there was a call to a family shelter hotline that was referred to Child Protective Services.

Mankin: And, what was the nature of that call?

Doran: A 16-year-old girl called to say that she was at the YFZ Ranch and that she had been abused.

Mankin: Physical abuse, or sexual abuse?

Doran: She reported being physically abused, even to the point of needing medical treatment. And, I believe there was a second call from the girl.

Mankin: Didn’t she also claim to be the mother of an 8 month old baby?

Doran: I believe that to be the case. She also said she was pregnant again.

Mankin: Okay, if she was 16 and her birthday was in early January, as described in the warrant, calculating the age of her baby and an extra nine months for pregnancy, that would make her 14 at the time the baby was conceived.

Doran: Probably.

Mankin: Wouldn’t that also indicate that there had been sexual abuse of her as a child?

Doran: I can’t argue with that.

Mankin: So, that was enough probable cause?

Doran: The request from CPS was our probable cause, but we combined that with information that myself and others have gathered over the past four years. All of that went on the affidavit requesting a warrant.

Mankin: You mentioned information you and others have gathered. Would some of that information have come from the confidential informant that was mentioned in the affidavit.

Doran: That is correct.

Mankin: Okay, on the subject of the informant. There was a bit of controversy this week when ABC News and others reported that your informant was a person inside the YFZ Ranch. Was that actually the case.

Doran: Absolutely not! You saw the affidavit. You know it said the informant was a former member of the FLDS. You and I both know that they don’t allow former members at the YFZ.

Mankin: Let me get this straight then...when the warrant was issued, the informant had never been at the YFZ Ranch?

Doran: That’s correct! To get a warrant, it takes a complaint from a victim or first hand knowledge of a crime. The informant provided an abundance of good information, but none of it was based on first hand knowledge and therefore it wasn’t enough to go to a judge with and seek a warrant.

Mankin: So the call from the 16- year-old girl was essential?

Doran: The request from CPS was essential. I suppose her call was essential to them.

Mankin: So, how long from the time you got word that CPS was asking for help until the time you surrounded the YFZ Ranch.

Doran: About three days.

Mankin: That’s a big operation to put together in three days, surely law enforcement must have had a preliminary plan in place ready to deal with this kind of eventuality?

Doran: Let’s just say that law enforcement was and is prepared to answer a cry for help at the YFZ Ranch.

Mankin: The fact that the call to assist CPS occurred at the YFZ really complicated things, didn’t it?

Doran: It surely did.

Mankin: So, walk me through the way an ordinary CPS call goes.

Doran: Well, we roll up to the house, knock on the door and escort CPS inside to check on the welfare of children.

Mankin: It didn’t work that way this time.

Doran: No, it couldn’t work that way because the people at the YFZ didn’t want to cooperate.

Mankin: Okay, let’s talk about that. How did the first contact go?

Doran: Well, we rolled up to the gate just as the perimeter was being sealed around the ranch and the roads leading to the property were being blocked.

Mankin: You say we rolled up, who is we?

Doran: Ranger Captain Barry Caver, myself and another Texas Ranger.

Mankin: What happened next.

Doran: Fairly soon I received a call on my cell phone from Merrill Jessop.

Mankin: Merrill Jessop is the overseer at the YFZ Ranch?

Doran: That’s a good word, overseer.

Mankin: What did he say?

Doran: He was out of town, and someone from inside the ranch had called to alert him to our presence. He knew about our perimeter and the fact that we were waiting at the gate.

Mankin: What did you tell Mr. Jessop?

Doran: I told him to get a couple of men with authority to come to the gate. They did, but they still delayed us an hour and a half before they let us in.

Mankin: You didn’t force the issue?

Doran: There was no need to force the issue, they weren’t going anywhere. Why take the risk of getting somebody hurt?

Mankin: You told me one time that if such a day ever came you hoped to talk your way into the ranch, talk your way through it and talk your way out.

Doran: And, that’s exactly how it happened. We kept in mind the difference in cultures and the fact that they put great store in the ranch being a sacred place. Talking made more sense that anything else. And, when you’ve got a few Texas Rangers around, people tend to listen a little more closely.

Mankin: So, they finally let you in the gate. How many went in?

Doran: I’m not exactly sure how many law enforcement officers, let’s just say a handful, and some CPS investigators.

Mankin: What happened then?

Doran: We asked to see the girl who called for help, but they wouldn’t produce her.

Mankin: At this time you were working under the original search warrant. What was the scope of that warrant?

Doran: You’ve seen it. We were basically directed to search anywhere and everywhere in order to find the girl and put her in touch with CPS.

Mankin: At some point, the warrant was amended.

Doran: Actually, Judge Walther issued a second warrant.

Mankin: Judge Barbara Walther?

Doran: Yes, Judge Barbara Walther. She issued the original warrant and issued the second one expanding the search to include looking for evidence of other crimes.

Mankin: What prompted the new warrant?

Doran: Let’s just say when we got in there law enforcement officers and CPS investigators witnessed evidence of other crimes.

Mankin: CPS has reportedly identified a number of pregnant young girls, or young girls with babies. Would that be the evidence of other crimes you are referring to?

Doran: Well....I’m going to leave that question for CPS to answer.

Mankin: Fair enough. So, a new warrant was issued and the search is going house to house?

Doran: Let’s say building to building, methodically, building to building.

Mankin: At some point it was decided to put the children on a bus and send them to Eldorado.

Doran: CPS needed a neutral site where they could interview the children...a nearby site that could be secured.

Mankin: Were the adults at the YFZ Ranch being cooperative.

Doran: They were never cooperative. They were accommodating, but not cooperative.

Mankin: Was it that way the entire time?

Doran: I’d say that the longer it went the less cooperation we received.

Mankin: We’ve heard from people at the YFZ, particularly the women, that law enforcement officers tore babies from their mothers’ arms.

Doran: It never happened.

Mankin: You know that for a fact?

Doran: I know it for a fact. At one point, when it appeared we were going to have some trouble, I called Merrill Jessop from my cell phone. I put him on speaker phone and he told the women to cooperate. He said it several times.

Mankin: How did that work?

Doran: It worked well. The women’s mood changed immediately and they handed over the children.

Mankin: So, 416 children in all, were you expecting that many?

Doran: No, I wasn’t. Merrill had told me there were about 120 people on the compound, but he told me lots of things and now I know that very little of it was true.

Mankin: Okay, let’s talk about the temple. Law enforcement officers entered it using a S.W.A.T. team from Midland, is that right?

Doran: That is correct, but only because they refused to unlock the doors and cooperate with a legal search warrant. We even tried to have a locksmith open them, but to no avail.

Mankin: I heard that the jaws of life were used to pry open the doors...any truth to that?

Doran: Let’s just say we used the appropriate tools for the job.

Mankin: I understand one man was arrested for interfering with lawmen as they attempted to enter the temple.

Doran: That is my understanding.

Mankin: Levi Jeffs, the son of Warren Jeffs was booked into your jail and charged with interfering with the duties of a public servant.

Doran: Yes he was. But, I didn’t witness the incident at the temple. I have heard the same reports, but I didn’t personally see it.

Mankin: Was Levi Jeffs the only one arrested?

Doran: My understanding is he was the only one arrested at the temple. Another man was arrested later.

Mankin: Leroy Johnson Steed was arrested and booked into jail for tampering or fabricating evidence with intent to impair.

Doran: That’s right.

Mankin: We’ve heard that he was caught trying to hide children.

Doran: I’ll refer you to the District Attorney on that one.

Mankin: All right. Can we talk about what you found in the temple?

Doran: I’d rather not.

Mankin: It’s been reported that a bed was found on the top floor of the temple and there have been implications that it might have been used for consummating marriages moments after the ceremony.

Doran: I wouldn’t know about that.

Mankin: Actually, I heard a couple of reports that there were two beds found. Is that accurate?

Doran: I’d say that was an accurate statement.

Mankin: So, the search moved on to the building called the temple annex?

Doran: It did.

Mankin: We’ve heard that there was a bank vault in the annex and that lawmen had to use jackhammers to open it.

Doran: I’ll only say that there was a vault and the locksmiths’ couldn’t open it.

Mankin: Did you gain entry to the vault with the jack hammers?

Doran: We gained entry using the appropriate tools for the job. Let’s just leave it at that.

Mankin: Any idea what the FBI wanted when they finally arrived at the YFZ Ranch?

Doran: No. They had their own search warrant and I’m not privy to that information. You’ll have to ask them.

Mankin: Okay, we’ve heard a lot of speculation through the years that there is a crematorium at the temple. Did you find an incinerator or a crematorium?

Doran: No. Not at the temple, not anywhere.

Mankin: Any tunnels?

Doran: No...no tunnels.

Mankin: All right, how about weapons? Did you find any weapons?

Doran: Yes, we located some weapons, but none that were illegal.

Mankin: What about the documents seized?

Doran: I wasn’t on the evidence gathering team so I don’t know much about that...and I probably couldn’t comment if I did know.

Mankin: All right, I said this would be about the raid, but I have to ask about Dale Evans Barlow. There was a warrant listing him as the man who allegedly abused the 16-year-old girl. Apparently neither he nor the girl can be found. Any comment?

Doran: You’ll need to ask CPS about the girl.

Mankin: CPS seems to be convinced that they have the original complainant among a group of young girls who are pregnant, and otherwise meet the description.

Doran: There again, you need to check with CPS about that.

Mankin: And, Mr. Barlow?

Doran: As for Mr. Barlow, I cannot comment except to say that Barlow is a common name in this group. Who is to say the hotline operator heard the first name correctly. I have faith that the investigators will sort it all out.

Mankin: Okay, there’s just one more thing. Waco. I know it had to weigh heavily on your mind when this first started. How much of a role did Waco play in the way all of this turned out.

Doran: It played a huge role in the sense that everyone I know in Texas law enforcement is determined to make sure something like that never happens again. That’s why I prefer talking. There’s always more time to talk and the longer you talk the greater the chance you can work things out. It’s when you stop talking that things can go wrong.

Mankin: Thank you, for the time. I know how busy you’ve been and I know the news media is driving you crazy.

Doran: Well, they are out of luck. This is the last word I’m going to have on the subject for the next several days. I wanted our hometown folks to hear the truth as I know it, to the extent that I can say. Maybe we can say more later.


IF, note that conditional statement, IF every single accusation against the FLDS people were true (and we know better), that would not justify Ranger Long claiming that Sheriff Doran's 'informant' was inside the ranch and could confirm that adult men had sex with minor girls inside the temple in the affidavit used to apply for the search warrant. IF every single accusation against the FLDS people were true (and we know better), that would still not justify Judge Walthers holding the 14 day hearings en masse, refusing to even read the attorneys' motions, and treating over a hundred families as a single household unit- when they have different houses, lock and key entrances, separate bedrooms, bathrooms, and kitchens.
There is nothing the state of Texas can charge members of the FLDS with that will somehow retroactively sanction the removal of 450 children from their homes, separating them from their siblings, parents, and all they know and love because Angie Voss and company cannot tell the difference between 37 year olds and 16 year olds.
For the state to work outside the laws is a greater threat to a far greater number of people than for any private group to violate the law- and as we have learned in following this situation, the FLDS are guilty of far fewer legal infractions than we have been led to believe, and CPS thinks neither the 1st nor the 4th amendments apply to them.

I read a really neat passage in scripture this morning that I would like to share along with some thoughts I had :)

Romans 11:33-36

33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!

34 For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor?

35 Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?

36 For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen.

~~~

That made me feel so... awed. (I went and looked up "awed" and the descriptions were so good that I'll share them too. :)

1.an overwhelming feeling of reverence, admiration, fear, etc., produced by that which is grand, sublime, extremely powerful, or the like. Dictionary.com

1.A mixed emotion of reverence, respect, dread, and wonder inspired by authority, genius, great beauty, sublimity, or might.
American Heritage Dictionary.


I think it just so amazing that God can cause all those feelings to come to us...Argh, I'm having a great deal of trouble figuring out to describe and write what I want to say...He's so big and powerful and yet all He wants is for us to love Him with our whole heart.
He could make us worship Him with just fear and trembling, but that's not all He wants; He wants us to let Him take care of us.

We don't know His ways, we don't know what's in His mind and we haven't given Him any counsel, we haven't given Him anything so why should He give to us, and yet, everything is "from Him, through Him, and to Him.

We can't possibly ever know everything about God:
" 33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!"

He is a great mystery to me, I do fear Him, and I can't even begin to imagine how wonderful He is. But I can learn about Him through His Word and the world He created.

Deuteronomy 6:5
"And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. "



I hope that that made a little bit of sense, I have the hardest time putting my thoughts into writing. (And even sharing them is difficult to me, but I'm trying to get better :) )

FLDS July 28th

Newsweek did a story on Rozita Swinton- the 31 year old woman responsible for the hoax phone calls used to justify the raid on the YfZ ranch in Texas and removal of over 450 children. Ann Marie has more.

A number of posts at I Perceive, including this one, where Kurt responds to Texas Bluesman and the criticism TBM made against Kurt- oddly, here at this blog instead of on Kurt's blog. This post is also excellent- Kurt points out that this mess is merely

one thread in a nationwide tapestry of judicial distortion and deception the object of which is to fundamentally alter the essence of the American family by forcibly inserting the state into private homes wherever possible.
He also gives us more background information on Marci Hamilton, the 'constitutional law scholar' who has been quite vocal in her criticism of the Texas Supreme Court's ruling supporting the 3rd Court's requirement that Walthers vacate her order.

The forums at Talkleft have had some good discussion on this case.

The NYT did a slideshow of their visit to the ranch after CPS returned the children.

State officials, perhaps because they noticed that every time they open their mouths somebody checks what they say against the facts, are being more circumspect about what they say. They've canceled a previously scheduled interview with the media:
State child welfare officials, in anticipation of a possible lawsuit from a polygamous sect, are carefully watching what they say about an April raid on the sect's West Texas ranch.

Through spokeswoman Stephanie Goodman, Department of Family and Protective Services Commissioner Carey Cockerell and his boss, Health and Human Services Executive Commissioner Albert Hawkins, this week canceled an interview scheduled for July 30 with the American-Statesman and the Houston Chronicle.

Both newspapers have repeatedly asked for the chance to query Hawkins and Cockerell about the decision to seize more than 400 children from the Eldorado ranch owned by the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints on suspicions of child abuse.

After a legal battle, the state returned the children and is continuing its Child Protective Services investigation and a separate criminal investigation. This week, state District Judge Barbara Walther ordered that the child welfare case be broken up by mother, meaning that there are 234 separate cases.

"There's kind of a number of moving pieces," Goodman said in explaining the interview cancellation of the interview. "We're still in the middle of our actual CPS cases. We have the potential of FLDS to basically sue the state. Given all that, the time is probably not appropriate."

Keeping in mind the strange release of the salacious photographs of Warren Jeffs kissing an 11 or 12 year old girl in a less than fatherly fashion, the use of them at a hearing where they were sprung on the defense without warning and were never validated and the state refused to say where they came from, keeping in mind as well the release and publication of Teresa Jeffs private letters and cards, and her attorney's weekend delay in requesting that the records of her minor client be sealed, this claim almost makes me laugh:
Goodman said that because the West Texas grand jury has not finished its proceedings, Hawkins and Cockerell "don't want to influence that process."


John Dougherty on the FLDS-
it's mostly audio, so I can't tell you the gist of it. Page does have those unsettling and disturbing pictures of Warren Jeffs kissing the child, so be forewarned.
---------

Updated to add: Natalie Malonis and Kurt at I Perceive have had some email exchanges, where she calls into question the affidavits in her ten year long divorce and custody case. I'm willing to believe that almost anything said in a custody/divorce case should be taken with a grain of salt. But Malonis' decision to appear on the Nancy Grace show three times, and grant an interview with a blogger (while she criticizes Kurt for blogging about it, saying,
"The tragedy here is that real children’s fates are at stake, yet you and your readers and others of the same ilk take it upon yourselves to exploit these lovely children for entertainment on a blog … an arena that is not even real!"

You can read that blog interview she granted here.
I blogged about it here, and note that she granted that blog ('an arena that's not even real'!) an interview twice- the only attorney I know of who has done so.

Quote

Do not think of waiting until you can do some great thing for God. Do little things, and then the master will bid you go up higher.

Spurgeon

Of Drop Outs and Elite Private Schools

The state of California just announced that one in three students in the Los Angeles public school system drops out before graduating. Among black and Latino students in L.A. district schools, the numbers are 42% and 30%. In the past five years, the number of dropouts has grown by more than 80%. The number of high school graduates has gone up only 9%.


Somebody recently told me that figures showing homeschooled students outperforming public school students are skewed because public schools have to take everybody, and homeschools don't.
I actually do agree that it's not entirely fair to compare the two forms of education, because I am not doing what a public school teacher is doing and I don't want to.
But figures like those above make it clear that if public schools do 'take everybody,' they don't keep them. And of those they do keep, an increasing number are graduated with diplomas they cannot even read.

To fix this problem, we give more money to the institutions that are failing- and those failing institutions are propped up by administrators and lobbying groups that seek more oversight... of homeschoolers and private schools which actually have higher success rates.

From a recent WSJ editorial
:

It's well known that the force calling the Democratic tune here is the teachers unions. Earlier this month, Senator Obama accepted the endorsement of the National Education Association, the largest teachers union. Speaking recently before the American Federation of Teachers, he described the alternative efforts as "tired rhetoric about vouchers and school choice."

Mr. Obama told an interviewer recently that he opposes school choice because, "although it might benefit some kids at the top, what you're going to do is leave a lot of kids at the bottom." The Illinois Senator has it exactly backward. Those at the top don't need voucher programs and they already exercise school choice. They can afford exclusive private schools, or they can afford to live in a neighborhood with decent public schools. The point of providing educational options is to extend this freedom to the "kids at the bottom."

A visitor to Mr. Obama's Web site finds plenty of information about his plans to fix public education in this country. Everyone knows this is a long, hard slog, but Mr. Obama and his wife aren't waiting. Their daughters attend the private University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, where annual tuition ranges from $15,528 for kindergarten to $20,445 for high school.

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Sunday Hymn Post

Jesus Calls Us
Text: Cecil Frances Alexander, 1818-1895 (who also wrote All Things Bright and Beautiful)
Music: William H. Jude
Tune: GALILEE, Meter: 87.87


1. Jesus calls us o'er the tumult
of our life's wild, restless sea;
day by day his sweet voice soundeth,
saying, "Christian, follow me!"

2. As of old the apostles heard it
by the Galilean lake,
turned from home and toil and kindred,
leaving all for Jesus' sake.

3. Jesus calls us from the worship
of the vain world's golden store,
from each idol that would keep us,
saying, "Christian, love me more!"

4. In our joys and in our sorrows,
days of toil and hours of ease,
still he calls, in cares and pleasures,
"Christian, love me more than these!"

5. Jesus calls us! By thy mercies,
Savior, may we hear thy call,
give our hearts to thine obedience,
serve and love thee best of all.

More here.

More on Cecil Frances Alexander here and here.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Amazing.

I took FYB, FYG, and some friends down to the creek earlier today to play around, and this is what landed just a little ways up the creek from us:





It stayed there for quite awhile, and let us get fairly close to us. I've never had one come this close and STAY this close before, so it was really cool.

FLDS, July 26th- a legal primer for all of us

When Judge Walthers acknowledged yesterday that the families from the ranch were separate families and not a single household, she also signed an an order that ought to make every citizen in this country shiver in fear.

Brooke Adams reports:

The judge also ordered that discovery motions -- or requests for the information gathered by the state -- be suspended until she adopts a management plan.
Many attorneys representing the children and their parents had filed motions to sever their cases and for discovery so they could begin to focus individually on their clients' situations.
The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services acknowledged in a motion filed Thursday that it has received numerous requests for information.
"Efforts to reach agreements on the timing and content of discovery have been unsuccessful and resources that would otherwise be available to resolve legal issues relating to the children have been devoted to dealing with discovery requests and resulting disputes," the department's motion said.
It asked that the judge suspend discovery until the cases were severed,
investigation is completed and "cases that do not require further court intervention" are dismissed.


Once again we have CPS (and the Judge) basically arguing that it's too much trouble to bother with technical niceties like due process and adhering to the law.

Kurt, at I Perceive, gives those of us who aren't lawyers a bit of a primer on Discovery:
“Discovery” refers to the process whereby the FLDS parents and children get access to whatever evidence the State may have to justify the continuing presence of CPS in the lives of FLDS families. Ever since the State stole personal records and gather DNA samples back in April, it has refused to share that information with attorneys representing FLDS parents and children. Staying discovery allows the State to continue to stall and pretend is has evidence justifying the State’s refusal to allow the FLDS to return to their homes in Eldorado, Texas.


Then he points out why this should concern us all. First of all, Judge Walthers signed the order on Thursday- the same Thursday that Harry Reid was holding his imbalanced, kangaroo tribunal in D.C. She let the FLDS attorneys in on what she'd done Friday, mid-day. And this is important. This is where things get really ominous:
It came as a complete surprise to the AALs representing the FLDS kids. One remarked, off the record, “I bet the press release failed to mention the suspension of discovery or that this was all ex parte with no notice to any of the attorneys.”

Ex parte, for non-lawyers, means in essence, “talking to only one side of the case.” Judges are not supposed to do it. Fundamental to our Constitution is the idea that all parties to a case must be given the right to be there, participating when any other party communicates with the judge. The Texas Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 3(B)(8), flatly prohibits ex parte communications (see below).


Kurt says CPS knew about the motion to stay discovery in advance- but none of the ad litems for the children knew anything about it, nor did any other FLDS representatives. So Walthers is in direct violation of this particular portion of the Texas code for Judicial conduct:
(8) A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person’s lawyer, the right to be heard according to law. A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications or other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties between the judge and a party, an attorney, a guardian or attorney ad litem, an alternative dispute resolution neutral, or any other court appointee concerning the merits of a pending or impending judicial proceeding. A judge shall require compliance with this subsection by court personnel subject to the judge’s direction and control.



Charles Childress filed that motion. You may recognize the name. I mentioned Childress in this post. Thanks to Kurt's hard work (again), we know that Childress is a "Clinical Professor" at the University of Texas School of Law, and the state hired him to to train the attorneys and ad litems
on one side of the FLDS case, the side they like to call “for the children.”


Kurt says he's now lead counsel for CPS in the FLDS case(s). LEt's look a bit more closely at the process the state used (through Childress) to train the attorneys and ad litems. The following isn't my work, but comes from kpb, a frequent commenter on several blogs, and a regular source of solid information on the case- he's very good at connecting the dots:


What entity trained the AAL’s?
PERMANENT JUDICIAL COMMISSION FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES
Or
The Supreme Court of Texas?

The training in San Angelo was delivered by three individual attorneys identified as vendors in the contracts and invoice documents found [here]

Those three attorneys were AZ attorney Lenore Knudtson, Austin attorney Lori K. Duke, and Charles D. Childress, "Clinical Professor" at the University of Texas School of Law.

According to the same contracts and invoices, the San Angelo training was paid for by the Supreme Court of Texas on behalf of the Permanent Commission. In addition to other issues, this raises questions about possible illegal commingling of funds. If these invoices do not evince commingling, then it is logical to conclude that the Court and the Commission are the same entity because they show the Court paying expenses for the Commission and an employee of the Commission (Jacque Barclay) who seems not to know which entity she works for.

Jacque Barclay, identified on the Commission's website as the Commission's Financial Analyst is treated in the contracts as a Supreme Court employee.

Note also that one AAL has shared that they were aware of another training session that took place in Dallas, after the San Angelo training event.

Is this the Commission that abruptly shut down their last public meeting when the only thing left on the agenda was questions and comments by from the public audience?

How was that entity established?

Two years ago, the Texas Supreme Court created the Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth & Families to improve how the judicial system treats abused and neglected children. Commission members will have their work cut out for them with the FLDS removal cases. "Thank goodness we had a structure in place," says Texas Supreme Court Justice Harriet O'Neill, chairwoman of the commission.


ORDER ESTABLISHING PERMANENT JUDICIAL COMMISSION FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES
“…The Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families (the "Commission") is created to develop, implement, and coordinate policy initiatives designed to improve courts and court practice for children, youth, and families in the child-protection system. “

[...]

Who directed that training?
The training appears to have been "directed" on the ground in San Angelo by Charles G. Childress. This appears to be the case because Childress's powerpoint presentation and book were delivered with the Open Records Act Request as part of the training materials. No other attorney -- except the UT and AZ AGs -- prepared any training materials at least not according to what the Commission provided with the Request.

Who is Childress? Mr. CPS!

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES - Austin, Texas (1997-2001) [read it well]

It is clear from the story [here] that both Justice Harriet O'Neill and Judge John Specia (each also a member of the Commission) were involved in planning and/or negotiating for the training.


And this was very interesting- and quite disturbing:


[Insiders appear to have evidently known HOW Walthers would rule in the 14 day hearing 3 days before it started (DNA testing needed!)

“Lawyers will first need to determine who the biological parents of the children are -- a daunting task in cases involving a polygamist sect, Vick says, that will involve more than interviewing the children and adults who live at the compound."…. "They won't know because the kids don't know, because they are raised communally," says Toby Goodman, a family lawyer and partner in Arlington's Goodman & Clark. "So they are going to have to do DNA testing." [These are team member comments 3 days before the hearing! It was already determined and published that the identification available was NOT acceptable.]


Perhaps DNA did not tell them what they wanted to know. Perhaps they don't have any real evidence supporting their cases, and this is why CPS wants discovery suspended.

With actions like these, can any citizen be safe from the anonymous accusations of a disgruntled neighbor, employee, or relative?

Friday, July 25, 2008

Judge Walthers Finally Divides FLDS Cases

From here:

Nearly four months after the largest child-custody case in U.S. history commenced, 51st District Judge Barbara Walther has broken it up, leaving 244 separate cases involving the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.

Walther split Case No. 2902 - which included more than 300 children - into 110 cases grouped by mother, and Case 2903, which included more than 30 children, into nine cases, also grouped by mother. They join 125 cases filed separately by the state's Child Protective Services agency, which removed nearly 440 children from the sect's Schleicher County compound in early April.

"This is something we've known all along needs to be done," said Tom Green County District Court clerk Vicki Vines. "Nobody had a good enough grasp on it (until now). Everybody's got it a little more under control."

According to the motions requesting the division, filed by CPS, court-ordered DNA tests "and other documents" have sufficiently confirmed the relationship between the children in the cases and their biological mothers, allowing the court to move forward with splitting the massive case.


Updated to add:
More here:

The judge also ordered that discovery motions -- or requests for the information gathered by the state -- be suspended until she adopts a management plan.
Many attorneys representing the children and their parents had filed motions to sever their cases and for discovery so they could begin to focus individually on their clients' situations.
The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services acknowledged in a motion filed Thursday that it has received numerous requests for information.
"Efforts to reach agreements on the timing and content of discovery have been unsuccessful and resources that would otherwise be available to resolve legal issues relating to the children have been devoted to dealing with discovery requests and resulting disputes," the department's motion said.
It asked that the judge suspend discovery until the cases were severed,
investigation is completed and "cases that do not require further court intervention" are dismissed.


I guess this answers Kpb's point (emailed to me this morning):
On page 18 of the pdf [of the court transcript], for April 17 when it started, go to line 18 (it is actually page 18 of the original transcripts) and you see what follows:

"Ladies and gentlemen, this is an emergency temporary hearing. You have not waived ALL of your rights. The law requires that I hold this hearing within fourteen days of the removal of the children. You still have the final hearings... if I keep the children. So let's -- let's get to what we have to do. We will deal with those special exceptions. I don't know that I can rule on them at this point in time. Let's -- let's begin this process. Quite honestly, I've NOT seen your special exceptions or ANY of the other motion that you all have file today"


Now go back a page or so to read up to it, and you'll see what led up to this, discussion of various pleadings. None were heard. I am not sure if she has even signed any to acknowledge receipt of them yet.

She more less said "screw your rights, I'm in charge here, we'll consider them at the FINAL HEARING". That is a prime example of the due process that wasn't!


And updated again to point out another math issue:
Some cases had already been separated out, which may be why the new list shows only 313 children. Names of some children and mothers appear to be missing. Only one of mother Sarah Draper's four children taken during the raid is shown on the list, for example.

The Real Purpose of Public School

WE've talked before about how the ubiquitous question, 'But what about socialization' is a tacit acknowledgment that school isn't really about education in most people's minds- it's about some nebulous thing called socialization. I say it's nebulous because in other people's minds it often is. I know this because I am just mischievous enough to enjoy answering this question with a question, 'How do you define socialization?' I enjoy this because often the response is merely a blank stare- as it becomes obvious that the person challenging me on whether or not I am meeting those needs for socialization has never actually thought about it before and has no working definition of the term.

For several years now homeschooling critics have been bringing up another 'purpose' of public schooling- defending children from those evil people, their parents. Here's a prime example:

In remarks submitted to a U.S. Senate panel in Washington, Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard said hundreds of children in Colorado City could be going without schooling.


Two points. I told you so. I told you that what they used to go after the FLDS would be used to go after the rest of us. Stay with me for a few more quotes from the article.
Second point: watch how often this 'could be' argument is used by government officials. Of course, if several hundred children 'could be' going without schooling, then it's just as possible that maybe several hundred children 'could be' getting a perfectly adequate education. 'Could be' is not probable cause for government intervention, although you couldn't tell it be the number of times it's used to justify government intervention.

Goddard said children are frequently seen playing outside during school hours and school-age boys as young as 12 reportedly are working at construction sites.

Two points:
1. School hours are artificially inflated by trying to get thirty some odd children in lock step through the material- it takes about four times as long to cover the same material with thirty children as it does with the child at the dining room table. You can move on when your child gets it, stop when he doesn't, and you aren't interrupted by the classroom intercom, announcements, lunch money collections, school assemblies, busy work, the kid who needs discipline, etc, etc. Okay, YOU may be interrupted by the sibling in need of discipline, but you can instruct your child to read on. YOu can also have school OUTSIDE of school hours- we used to school in the evenings so that the children could play with their father when he was home during the mornings. You bet my children were seen outside during school hours.
2. How do they know children as young as 12 are working at construction sites? Is this the eyeball test again? The one used to label a 37 year old woman as 16? The one used to label a 22 year old pregnant woman as 15?

But Mohave County School Superintendent Mike File said the number of children not in school could be lower because some FLDS members have left Colorado City and neighboring Hildale, Utah, with many moving to a new enclave in Texas.

Ooh, look quickly, Mr. Goddard, there's a fact there- hurry, hurry, it may escape you if you don't grab it quick.
Warren Jeffs ordered followers to move their children from public schools into private or homeschools in 2000. At that time, local enrollment was around 1100. Enrollment dropped to 300. It is now up to 450, according to File. Hmm. And there were some 450 children removed from their homes in Texas, all from families who moved there from other FLDS communities in 2004/5 or later.
File seems to believe the majority are home educating but 'without filing the proper paper work.'
Here's a secret between you, me and the world wide web. I don't file paperwork, either. Haven't done it in years and years. Whether or not I filed the paperwork had nothing to do with whether or not I did a good job of home educating my children that year.

Some FLDS members could also be homeschooling. Arizona law requires:
An affidavit of intent shall be filed within thirty days from the time the child begins to attend a home school and is not required thereafter unless the home school instruction is terminated and then resumed. The person who has custody of the child shall notify the county school superintendent within thirty days of the termination that the child is no longer being instructed at a home school.


However,
...Goddard said only 12 parents have filed home-school affidavits.

But wait- FLDS families tend to be large. If 12 parents filed affidavits, how many children did that represent? 36? 72? And it seems they only have to file the affidavit once and then never again- so is he saying only 12 have ever filed affidavits, or 12 this year? Is it possible he is unaware that the affidavits only have to be filed once?

And now we come to the title of this post- the real purpose of government schooling, according to Goddard:
Besides the educational consequences and lost opportunities for the children involved, it's important to have children in school so school personnel can report any signs of abuse or neglect, Goddard said. "A lot of time it's the school nurse that is the first line of defense," he said.

So I guess they have no defense before they reach school age, and in the summer time it's open season on abusing children? And you will notice that what he just said is a viewpoint that applies to every single one of us- not just the FLDS.
Can I say 'I told you so' again?
Schools exist to police parents. And if that's the case, then all parents have to have all their kids in schools. That is where we are heading.

Goddard said he is working with other officials and advocates to enforce truancy laws and persuade parents to enroll their children in school.

Since when is persuading parents NOT to home educate the proper role for the state attorney general? Does he not have real crimes to investigate?

Goddard said he started making inquiries with education officials about the situation late in the last school year so action could be taken this summer before another school year is lost. "Time's a wasting," he said.
If it turns out there are truancy violations, the county sheriff and local police - "if we can have confidence in them" - would enforce the law, Goddard said.

Wait a sec. He's been investigating for several months, and all he can say is 'if' there are truancy violations, and there 'could be' children not being educated? Utah Arizona residents might just want to investigate how their State AG is spending their tax money.

Government Nannies

From WND:

"The U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to debate two bills that could give the federal government unprecedented control over the way parents raise their children – even providing funds for state workers to come into homes and screen babies for emotional and developmental problems.

The Pre-K Act (HR 3289) and the Education Begins at Home Act (HR 2343) are two bills geared toward military and families who fall below state poverty lines. The measures are said to be a way to prevent child abuse, close the achievement gap in education between poor and minority infants versus middle-class children and evaluate babies younger than 5 for medical conditions."


While the bill may appear to be well-intentioned, Pediatrician Karen Effrem told WND government provisions in HR 2343 to evaluate children for developmental problems go too far.

"The federal definition of developmental screening for special education also includes what they call socioemotional screening, which is mental health screening," Effrem said. "Mental health screening is very subjective no matter what age you do it. Obviously it is incredibly subjective when we are talking about very young children."

More on Malonis

It turns out Malonis has some CPS and other baggage of her own. She has been accused, as recently as 2007, of child abuse. She's also has issues of drug abuse, neglect, and mental illness, including a three month stay in a mental institution. I first saw this a couple of days ago, and I was a bit squeamish about posting it. It's not very much different from what Malonis has done to Teresa, and Teresa is, after all, a minor and a minor Malonis is supposed to protect. But still- it concerned me, as did the tone of some of the comments in some of the places I was reading about this. So I didn't blog about it.

However, given the problems as revealed by the affidavits (available online, follow the links), Kurt at I Perceive points out:


I am dumbfounded that Texas CPS (or any CPS) could fail to conduct the most basic form of background check on the AALs hired to represent kids in foster care. Again, I wonder how many more AALs with similar backgrounds are even now — all around Texas — up close and personal with precious children, of all religions, about whom CPS brays incessantly.

For now, I urge readers to look with pity on Natalie Malonis. Save the outrage for Texas CPS, Supreme Court Justice Harriet O’Neill, and Governor Rick Perry under whose supervision and encouragement this atrocity has taken place. O’Neill and Perry are charlatans. O’Neill’s and Perry’s offices should be deluged with complaints. I have no idea what motivates Judge Barbara Walther, but she’s been a complete failure in this case as a barrier against prosecutorial excess.

Malonis — IMO — should never have been put in the position she now occupies. I believe that Natalie does not know what she is doing. It appears, she lacks the capacity to develop normal human relationships. As one former husband — Douglas Buchanan — wrote in his affidavit, in January 2003:

If they were my biological children, I would not want them in her care. There is a part of her that just does not connect.


It's a pretty sad tale. And it's pretty strange that given her history, Malonis is the court appointed ad litem for anybody, let alone a child in an abuse case.

While you're over at I Perceive, you should also check out his post on the illegal leakage of information about Teresa on Friday, and Malonis sallying into court on Monday to have it 'sealed.' Who leaked that information? Kurt has an educated guess.

Texas Wants a Perp Walk

Willie Jessop has stated publicly that if the state of Texas will only name the men that have been indicted, the FLDS will instruct those men to turn themselves in. The state has refused, and one the one hand, I can sort of see the point of not releasing the names of the people you want to arrest so they don't flee before you get there- but on the other hand, the state's position seems to be that these people are already in hiding- so then what's the point in not 'tipping them off?'

Yesterday on Jerri's radio program, Kurt said we should expect to see a 'perp walk,' a public arrest in full view of television cameras invited along for the show so that Texas could gain some ammunition in the publicity wars- and possibly poison a potential jury pool.

Texas Attorney Greg Abbott has already said there will be an 'aggressive' attempt to find these men, and I guess having them show up at the station under their own speed isn't in keeping with the aggression Abbott wants to display.

Bill Medvecky and the folks at the ranch are concerned that what Texas is looking for is another excuse to search the ranch, which would further traumatize the children there.

Two Things Meme

Two names I go by:

1. Bear
2. Pipsqueak

Two things I’m wearing right now:

1. old navy t shirt with an ADORABLE doggy on the front. I think it's the Equuschick's, but it was in my room.
2. basketball shorts (from the guys' dept.), not because I actually plan on playing anything, but cause they're cool and comfy and I was walking the dogs.

Two of my favorite things today:

1. singing!
2. seeing friends.

Two things I want at the moment:

1. Mary Poppins, so she could snap her fingers and have my clothes folded and the kitchen cleaned.
2. more sleep.

Two favorite pets I have had:

1. Alexander the Great, called Alex for short. He was my favorite kitty, but then he got stepped on by a pig and had to be put down a couple years ago.
2. D-man.

Two people I hope will fill this out:

1. MerryK
2. Tim

Two things I did last night:

1. made laundry soap
2. went to go see the musical "High Society" with Grannytea

Two things I ate last night:

1. Chocolate Chip Cookie
2. Ham (and yes, I did eat the cookie before my supper)

Two people I last talked to:

1. FYB, to tell him to clean up the Common Room...
2. D-man, to tell him to shut up and lay down.

Two things I will do tomorrow:

1. Sleep. :-D
2. Make lunch.

Farthest trips I have taken in the last 5 years:

1. I went to California two or three years ago, I think.
2. Colorado, in February.

Two favorite holidays:

1. Christmas
2. Thanksgiving

Two favorite beverages- well, nothing beats water for hydration, but these are my favorites to taste:

1. Orange Juice.
2. Dr. Pepper.

Pursue Self Education

I have mentioned this before, but it's pretty nifty and more people should know about it (and use it, as knowing is not enough), and it's been a while, and Occasus did me the honor of sending me an email with more comprehensive info, so I'll mention it again:
OpenCourse at MIT:

Unlocking Knowledge,
Empowering Minds.

Free lecture notes, exams, and videos from MIT. No registration required.

MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) is a web-based publication of virtually all MIT course content. OCW is open and available to the world and is a permanent MIT activity.

What is MIT OpenCourseWare?
MIT OpenCourseWare is a free publication of MIT course materials that reflects almost all the undergraduate and graduate subjects taught at MIT.

* OCW is not an MIT education.
* OCW does not grant degrees or certificates.
* OCW does not provide access to MIT faculty.
* Materials may not reflect entire content of the course.

How do I register to use MIT OpenCourseWare?
There is no registration or enrollment process because OCW is not a credit-bearing or degree-granting initiative.

Can I get a certificate?
No. MIT OpenCourseWare is a publication of the course materials that support the dynamic classroom interactions of an MIT education; it is not a degree-granting or credit-bearing initiative. However, you should work through the materials at your own pace, and in whatever manner you desire.

How do I find what courses are available? How do I search your site?
A site overview is available for MIT OpenCourseWare. You can also browse courses by department or use the advanced search to locate a specific course or topic.

High school students and educators should check out Highlights for High School.

What it takes to support this work

Each course we publish requires an investment of $10,000 to $15,000 to compile course materials from faculty, ensure proper licensing for open sharing, and format materials for global distribution. Courses with video content cost about twice as much, but your feedback about the significant value of these video materials helps to justify the cost. Learn more.

To learn more about OCW, we encourage you to:

Take a tour of the site
Read more about our history
Read more frequently asked questions

Two Things

Two things Meme


I was tagged for this meme ages ago by Kim at Life in a Shoe. I don't always notice when I've been tagged, or I do notice and then I forget all about it, so if you've tagged me and I 've not responded- it's not personal, it's just general scattiness.

Two names I go by:

1. Well, I'm not telling my name, so we'll have to go with the obvious- Mom

2. Muvver- mostly when somebody wants something.=)

Two things I’m wearing right now:

1. Tie-dyed pink and white tank top, underneath a

2. blue knit dress.

Two of my favorite things today:

1. The singing we're having tonight.

2. California rolls that I hope to make for the singing.

Two things I want at the moment:

1. for the HG to be home already.

2. A clean house. I always want a clean house. I almost never have one.

Two favorite pets I have had:

1. Curlie- a curly (I know, how originaly) black cock-a-poo I had when I was in junior high. He was following me across the street while I was being an idiot one night when I was 13, and he got hit by a car and hemorrhaged to death in my lap on the way to the Vet's. I have never felt the same about any dog since.

2. Josephine, my poor pet rat who went with me to college, occasionally to class in the pocket of my favorite prairie jumper, and who starved to death when I forgot to feed her while I was dating the Headmaster.

Two people I hope will fill this out:

1. Pip

2. Jenny

Two things I did last night:

1. Read from Twinkie, Deconstructed (a fascinating book, somewhat different from what I expected- I think it's a living science book)

2. Snuggled with The Boy while he talked at me about Bionicles.

Two things I ate last night:

1. Green Tea Pumpkin Seeds (I didn't get mine here, but this is a good picture of what they look like. They taste very good, too).

2. Sesame Pan Cakes, or Croquettes pimetees- these are a slightly sweet cracker with sesame seeds. Very tasty. I didn't buy them here (or pay this price), but it gives you a feel for the things.
Can you tell I went to the Asian grocery store yesterday?

Two people I last talked to:

1. The FYG, who wanted to borrow my iPod to listen to music while she cleaned up the toy corner in The Common Room.

2. Pip, who brought me the afore mentioned snacks because I couldn't remember what the Sesame Pan Cake thingies were called.

Two things I will do tomorrow:

1. Visit with friends who are spending the night tonight after the singing.

2. Think about wedding stuff. Oh, wait, I do that every day.

Farthest trips I have taken in the last 5 years:

1. We moved here from Colorado just about five years ago.

2. Washington, D.C.

Two favorite holidays:

1. Christmas

2. April Fool's Day- okay, it's not technically a holiday, but I like it.

Two favorite beverages- I drink more water than anything else. But that's boring.

1. Coffee made from organic dark roasted beans, freshly ground (our grinders came from the thrift shop, one for coffee and one for grinding fresh herbs and spices), and then pressed in a French Coffee Press and sweetened with hazelnut flavored creamer. MMMMMMM.

2. When I can get it, Yogu Time- a yogurt flavored drink. I like regular and melon flavored. White Peach is also good. When I can't get it, I can be found drinking Dr. Pepper.

Gold Dust

Last night I shared a bit of bizarreness from the court records submitted by CPS to the Court as proof of their allegations about egregious abuse and under-aged marriage on the part of the FLDS- they identified a woman 19 or 20 years old as the mother of a 13 year old. Rrrrrright.

Doran Williams, an attorney who has worked with CPS cases in the past, wrote this in the comments to that post:

Stuff like this in familiar to those of us lawyers who have tussled with CPS over the years. We consider it to be evidence of outrageous incompetence, AND the functional equivalent of gold dust. The latter because it makes it "easier" to show that CPS doesn't have a clue as to what our clients did or did not do.

In the FLDS case, because of the failure of the presiding judge to comply with the law and give all the parties a fair hearing, the gold dust was blown away.

So much of what the State of Texas gets away with in CPS cases is a result of the presiding judges giving the State a break. If it were not for judges being sympathetic to CPS, they would lose a lot more of their lawsuits.


So here's another look at what should have been gold dust, but, because of the way the FLDS hearings were handled so that attorneys didn't even get a chance to meet their clients, have their concerns voiced in court, or even have their motions looked at by the Judge (and this laundry list could go on forever), that gold dust was, as Doran says, blowin' in the wind.

Here's one of the FLDS members identified as an alleged perpetrator of abuse in the the records submitted to the court at the 14 day hearing:

Name: (I've removed his name for what will shortly be obvious reasons)

Rel/lnt: Self
DOB: 10/9/2007
Age: 0
Gender: Male
.....
Role: Alleged Perpetrator
.....


Ayup. CPS identified a six month old baby boy as an alleged perpetrator. I assumed this was a typo or clerical error, and it probably was, the first time. After that I am guessing it's a result of the cookie cutter approach CPS took, because this infant was identified as an alleged perpetrator not once, but at least three times on three different pages. This could not have happened (one hopes) had CPS taken the time to treat these cases on an individual basis, leaving the children under 13 or so at home. Had the judge not treated the entire group of some 450+/- children as members of a single household, had she given the attorneys time to meet with their clients and review the records, had she actually read any of the motions the attorneys submitted, that would also have been a way to stop this nonsense and get serious about investigating any actual cases of abuse early on in the process.


In a group of interviews described by CPS workers with various children of one large family, all of the children said nobody had ever touched them in anger or in the sacred places covered by their special undergarments (there were two or three different ways of referring to those areas). Some of them said if somebody did, they would go tell one of the mothers in the house. At least one said she would go tell her father.

In spite of the fact that not one child claimed to have been abused in any way, and without any other evidence being listed, CPS listed every single one of the children as 'victims of sexual abuse,' and several of them as victims of physical abuse. There is no explanation offered.

There are puzzling gaps- on every report form I saw, the question about whether or not Metamphetamines are involved is answered 'no.'
The other questions about the investigation are left blank- so on a form of some dozen or more questions, only one is answered at all- the rest of the page has only the formula questions:
Did CPS and Law Enforcement make first contact jointly?
Why Not?
Comments:
Did the worker audiotape or videotape interviews with children?
Why not all interviews?
Comments:
Were photographs taken of each child involved in the investigation?
Why Not?
Gave copy of the Parent's Guide to the parent (including absent parent) or
legal guardian.[they are supposed to check this if it's been done. I've not seen one checked yet)
Notified parent (including absent parent) or legal guardian of interview or
examination of a child within 24 hours of contact with child. [again- unchecked]
Were multiple person identification numbers found on any principal in the a/n
history search?
If Yes, were the multiple person identification numbers merged?
Was methamphetamine manufacturing alleged at intake? No [this is the only one of this list of questions that is ever answered]
Was methamphetamine manufacturing discovered/confirmed during
investigation?
Abbreviated Investigation?
Was a family team meeting offered?
If yes, did it occur?

There is a space for CPS to reply to each of those questions, but they don't answer them at all.

Although no specific details are given, in case after case CPS says this:

Rationale for Safety Decision:
Family is an active member of a religious sect that practice child marriages and engage in adolescent sexual conduct.

Tell us again this wasn't about religion. As for evidence? The evidence is that no under-aged marriages have occurred since Warren Jeffs went to prison two years ago.

According to this news report, Utah attorney general Shurtleff
... said months ago that he believed the sect's underage marriages had stopped.

The caregiver / parent reject intervention methods and refuse to cooperate, Protective custody is
needed,
Safety Threat Concerns
Is There a Present Danger of Serious Harm?
Family is part of a community that believes In child marriages which engage in adolescent sexual conduct. Family violence has been known to occur on the ranch and parents and other caregivers take no action.


I don't know what 'family violence has been known' to occur- I haven't come across any such thing yet (the transcripts are huge)- but I suspect this is all about the mythical Sarah, who in reality is the adult Rozita Swinton who has never been a member of the FLDS. So parents and caregivers took no action because they never saw 'Sarah' and her sufferings, because this was Rozita's fantasy, not reality.

Brainwashed Clones, They Are. Yep....

Except, you know, when they are annoying their caseworkers.

This individuality is really highlighted in the accounts of interviews submitted to the court by CPS, particularly those dealing with the children from one especially large family with several mothers in the home.
One daughter said if she was naughty she would be made to sit in a chair for about an hour. Another said she was never naughty, so she didn't know what would happen if she was. Another said discipline might be losing a privilege, or having to sit alone in a chair for a few minutes, or perhaps be sent to your room to reflect. As you would guess, the one who said she had to sit in her chair for, oh, about an hour, is much, much younger than the one who said it might be losing a privilege or sitting in a chair for a few minutes.

Some of the children talked chattily about what they liked to do in school and their favorite chores on the ranch and who their siblings were. Others, in the same family, didn't want to talk at all. I love this young lady of about 12 or so, about whom the interviewer said she:
"...politely answered, "Don't care to tell you," to every question that I asked her."

It never mattered what they said- every single one of them was the victim of sexual and often physical abuse, according to CPS.

Baskets



What's this about? See more at my weekly 'What's In My Hand' post at Frugal Hacks.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

These People Can't Do Math

Last week on online friend sent me a copy of the court transcripts and records from the 14 day hearing back in March. It only makes it more clear that CPS needed to do this, if they indeed needed to do anything at all, on a case by case basis, and attorneys needed to have time to examine the records and ascertain whether or not the allegations actually applied to their clients- or indeed, to anybody:

There is also a woman named Louisa who is approx 19 or 20 years old and she has a 14 year old child.


Elsewhere, a one year old baby boy is identified as an 'alleged perpetrator of sexual abuse,' not once, but three times.

Cookie Cutter Approaches

Here's an example of just how cookie cutter this 'investigation' was- this is the case of Merilyn Keate, one of the disputed minors- she's the mother of a baby boy about 15 months of age (although they have his birthday, CPS incorrectly identified him as 18 months old in other reports, probably so they can falsely claim she was 16 when he was conceived, even though she had to have been 17).
Brooke blogged about here here, when her adult status was confirmed, and lo and behold- CPS had the right dates for her birth in the documents presented at the 14 day hearing! So they knew she wasn't a minor any more from the beginning.

In the record, CPS identifies the baby as the victim of alleged physical and sexual abuse, the 'oldest victim' from that family.
His birth-date is given as 12/30/06. His mother's birthday is given as 1/7/90, and her age is identified as 18- so CPS knew she was an adult when they were holding her as a minor child and counting her in their inflated '31 minor girls who are pregnant or have children.'

It is true she had her son as a minor, one week before her 17th birthday- but that wasn't inflammatory enough for CPS, I guess, so they contradicted their own court filings and records and insisted she was still a minor child. And in the space on the form where they identify each person as either 'alleged victim' or alleged perpetrator- they identify this young mother's status as 'unknown.'

The caseworker claims,

"Household composition: 1 yo (OV), 18 yo mother (MO).
There are concerns that the child was sexually and physically abused. Name and relationship of AP is unknown."


So even though they insisted all the residents of the ranch constituted a single household, they say here that the only people in this household are this 18 year old mother and her 1 year old baby. And even though they submitted this record to the court, they counted this 18 year old as a minor child and continued to hold her in custody as such.
OV= Oldest Victim
MO- Mother
AP- Alleged Perpetrator

"There are concerns?" Where did they come from? Who voiced them? What are they based on? Whose concerns are they? Why doesn't CPS want to own up to the source of these 'concerns' and identify the reasons for them?

Furthermore, the caseworker answers affirmative (as they do on every form with this question) to the following:
Do the behaviors or discipline practices of any person seem violent or out of control?


This form is also repeated in many cases, and it's always answered the same way, regardless of what was said or observed in the face to face interviews:

Is Child Vulnerability Elevated?
Is There Insufficient Protective Capacity?

Family does not want to cooperate nor receive any intervention or contact with outside persons


No kidding. Is the fact that the mothers are impatient with their living conditions and the false accusations, and they want to go home proof they've done something wrong and might be 'violent?' I think it must be so in CPS' minds.

MT.CS1 - Has any child received physical harm that appears to be inflicted (non-accidental) or requires medical care, and where the actual harm is serious? Yes.
MT.CS2 - Has any caregiver or person who has access to any child made or expressed a credible threat that might result In Immediate danger of serious harm? Yes.
MT.CS4 - If child sexual abuse/sexual exploitation is suspected, do the circumsfances suggest that any child may be in Immediate danger of subsequent sexual abuse/sexual exploitation? Yes.
MT.CS5 - Is the maltreatment premeditated, bizarre, or sadistic? Yes
MT.CS6 - Are caregiver's explanations inconsistent with any child's injuries or circumstances? Yes
MT.CS7 - Does any caregiver appear unwilling or unable to meet any child's immediate needs that might result In immediate danger of serious harm (consider physical care, developmental needs, medical care. and mental health needs)? Yes.
MT.CH4 - Has any prior incident resulted in a severe outcome (child death, removal from the home required prompt medical or psychiatric attention, sexual intercourse or sexual acts performed with a child. etc.)?Yes

MT.TR1 - Are incidents escalating in severity or occurring more frequently? Yes
Concerns - Not addressed.
Area of Concern - Home and Social Environment
HS.DE2 - Are conditions in or around the home hazardous or unsanitary? Yes
HS.SV1 - Has any person in the home ever been a victim of family violence?* Yes
HS.SV2 - Has any person In the home ever been a perpetrator of family violence?* Yes


These last two- has any person in the home ever been....- are always answered yes, even though in another section of the form CPS have to acknowledge that there is no previous record of family violence.

Concerns - Not addressed.
Area of Concern - Response to Intervention
Concerns - Not addressed.
Area of Concern - Protective Capacities
PT.CP1 - Does any caregiver appear unWilling or unable to protect any child from other persons who may inflict serious harm (eg.. paramour, family member, or friend)? Yes

PT.CP2 - Are there indications that any child is being pressured to recant his or her allegations of abuse/neglect? Yes

Again, these questions are ALL answered yes in EVERY instance, even when, as in this case, the alleged victim isn't talking yet. This form is attached to the case record of a fifteen month old baby- nobody is possibly 'pressuring him to recant allegations.' He hasn't made any. He CANNOT make any, because he cannot speak. NOBODY in the community has made any such allegations, even those who can speak, so they they can't be pressured to 'recant' something they've never even said!


PTCP3 - Is there a lack of a support network that could help ensure the safety of any child or provide adequate supervision of any child (e.g., relative, close family friend, church members,
neighbor, community members)? Yes

PT.CP5 Does any caregiver reject necessary protective interventions, appear unconcerned about any child's safety, refuse access to any child or appear ready to flee with or hide any child? Yes

Concerns - Not addressed


So- after saying 'yes' to all those questions, claiming that this child, this 15 month old baby, has been the victim of sexual and physical abuse, abuse bizarre, sadistic, and premeditated, abuse that is escalating in severity (how they could even know that since this is the first time they've seen the child I do not know), see if the following doesn't strike you as incongruous.

This is from the actual interviews CPS had with the mother (who frequently said she didn't want to talk to CPS without an attorney present)

I advised Marilyn the purpose of my interview with her was to gather information about her and her family and to assess if there was any abuse or neglect of the children. (but somebody has already decided this)
Marilyn stated "we are peaceful people" Marilyn stated
she did not understand why "the men with the guns raided their ranch. Marilyn then added, "and It was a raid"
Marilyn said when the men with the guns railded their ranch it "scared the living spirit out of the children" I did not
ask her to elaborate what she meant by that.
Merilyn asked if I was against her people. I advised Marilyn I could not be against what I didn't know or understand.


But the above pages? They preceded this page. And here's the result of the examination of that baby described above as so tragically abused:
Face to face with [15 month old] In Shelter 5 at Fort Concho In San Angelo. [Baby] was dressed In overalls and long blue sleeve shirt. [Baby] had no bruises or marks that would Indicate physical abuse.[Baby] appeared to be
of healthy weight. [Mother said Baby] has an earache and chest congestion. Robert was seen by on site doctor and was given antibiotics for illness,


A day later:
Face to face with [Baby] in Shelter 5, Fort Concho. [Baby] appeared happy and playful. He was sitting in Marilyn's lap as she was giving him something to eat.

A day or two later- the caseworker complains that Marilyn now says her last name is Barlow and she's spelling her first name differently. It's still the same first name, however, and all she seems to have done is added the last name of her baby's father to her own name. The CPS worker describes that tragically abused baby thus:
[Baby] appeared healthy and well cared for. HIs cough appeared to have cleared with medication prescribed by onsite doctor on Monday. [Baby] appeared happy and interacting with Marilyn.

I advised Marilyn that the State has rules and laws that must be obeyed. I advised Marilyn that one of our laws is that any child under the age of 14 and under cannot consent to have husband wife relations with an adult.
I also advised Marilyn it is against the law for any person to have husband·wlfe relations with any child under the age of 18.

Marilyn looked down and refused to talk anymore without her lawyer.


Marilyn, again, was probably married to her adult husband when she was a minor, and given Hilderbran's efforts to outlaw the FLDS in Texas, her baby's daddy possibly is afoul of Texas law, although it remains to be seen whether or not Texas law is afoul of the Constitution. However, the CPS worker is lying to her when she says that it's against the law for ANY person to have sexual relations with ANY child under the age of 18.

14 year olds can STILL marry in Texas if they can get a Judge's approval. 16 year olds can marry if they have parental consent and file it at the courthouse. 17 year olds can legally consent to sex. Her baby was born at the end of '06. If she married in '05, it was probably legal, as, until the end of 2005, children 14 years of age could legally marry with parental consent.

So Marilyn was not only well within her rights to insist on an attorney, she was quite wise, as well, since the CPS worker either did not know the law or simply didn't care.

The Solution to Confusing Credit Score Information

Rugaber is certainly right that consumers need to be better informed about this. But his article seems to assume that it might be possible for consumers to compete with the debt merchants on a level playing field. As though the average person has the same kind of time, resources and expertise as those institutions do. As though the game wasn't rigged. As though we must simply, passively accept the unchecked, unregulated and unrestrained influence of the unelected triumvirate to dominate our economy and our lives.

Americans don't need yet another lecture from yet another personal finance reporter. Americans need torches and pitchforks.

I like it. More here.

FLDS, July 24th, and What's Up, Common Room?

Update: If you missed it, Jeri says it will replay for the next 23 hours in case any of our readers missed the live. show. The show restarts at 5 after the hour every hour for 23 hours. Other bloggers who were on:
Kurt from I Perceive
Bill from Free the FLDS
Betty from Principle Voices

-----------------------------
Update: WE ARE ON

We have an extraordinary bit of running around to do today (in our unairconditioned 12 passenger van). The HG, of course, is in Texas nannying for a family with 11 children The 11th was delivered by C-section yesterday morning, and while their mother is in the hospital, the HG is caring for the other children, who are 13 and under. Three of the children at home are still in diapers (there's a set of youngling quads).
She's off to a good start. Yesterday the older boys blew out the power in two bathrooms trying to solder something. She asked what the smell was and they told her only, "Well, we plugged something in that we forgot we aren't supposed to plug in. But we aren't using it anymore so the smell will go away soon." She was in the midst of toddler duties and somewhat distracted, so she didn't follow up immediately. Then she found them examining the breaker box, and insisted they cease and desist any electricity related activities until their father got home. That's when he discovered they'd melted the outlets, and hence, couldn't pursue their soldering any further. I believe he's told them to dress and bathe in the dark, as they deserve.

Jenny, Pip, and the FYG went to a girls' Bible study and relationship building night hosted by an older lady where we go to church, and we have to head down to pick them up.

The Cherub is being fitted, at long last, for a new AFO, or plastic leg brace. This is a process that has been a long time coming, as for a full year our insurance and Medi-care were spitting at each other and we got caught in the cross fire. It was finally resolved, although not entirely to our satisfaction. We cannot choose not to have Medi-care- it's simply not an option. Our insurance, which is supposed to be pretty comprehensive, won't cover a thing if we don't have Medicare, because the Cherub is eligible for it. We have to pay 100 dollars a month for insurance we shouldn't need, but there it is. At any rate, things are resolved and we are back in the insurance company's good graces and the Cherub can be seen again. Besides the insurance issues, she had to complete a number of other steps before we could get to the leg brace stage.

The HM has an appointment to discuss some business issues with somebody while we're down south, and we hope to fit in some shopping at the Asian grocery store and possibly the day-old bread store.

The Equuschick, recovering from a head cold she refuses to acknowledge is a head- cold (she says it's 'contagious allergies), has a riding lesson to give this morning and she'll be supervising the Boy, who remains at home.


While there are a few scheduled posts already set to go up automatically, I and most of the Progeny really aren't here, although we hope to be back in time to make my appearance here:


Austin, TX, July 23, 2008 --(PR.com)-- Sen. Harry Reid is holding a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee about the FLDS . Find out who is invited to testify and who is not.

At 3 PM E.T., Thursday, July 24, 2008, Jerri Ward will be discussing this on "I Object! Justice Examined" at Right Talk Radio with a panel of writers, lawyers and activists. Listen by clicking here and on the "I Object!" logo.

Kurt Schulzke is an Attorney/CPA and blogger who has analyzed and written on the FLDS debacle in Texas and blogs at IPerceive.net. Bill Medvecky is a parent advocate who has set up a website and petition to help the children of the FLDS at http://www.flds.ws/ and http://www.voicesforthechildren.org/. Deputy Headmistress is a homeschooling mom and blogger who noted the dangers to all homeschoolers posed by legislation which was proposed by Texas legislators in 2005 in an effort to rid the state of fellow American citizens because of their religious beliefs and practices. She blogs at http://heartkeepercommonroom.blogspot.com/.

Big Brother

England not only has 1,000 laws permitting the state to enter private homes
, they can listen in on private conversations, too:

Tens of thousands of Britons are being covertly tracked without their consent in a technology experiment which has installed scanners at secret locations in offices, campuses, streets and pubs to pinpoint people’s whereabouts.

The scanners, the first 10 of which were installed in Bath three years ago, are capturing Blue tooth radio signals transmitted from devices such as mobile phones, laptops and digital cameras, and using the data to follow unwitting targets without their permission.

Bonnet tip Gates of Vienna

Evidence for Global Cooling

Shrimp and other warm water fossils discovered in Antarctica.

HIgher Eduation

Should we go the way of high school and have universal access?

And if we do, will college go the way of high school and become universally devalued? Will Master's Degrees and PhDs become the new gold standard for employment at the grocery store?

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Eminent Domain and Other Government Thefts

As well as another book to add to my growing list of books to add to my reading list....

There is little chance for serious takings reform, but if there is any hope it will come from books like this one. The pirates are coming and we need to figure out if there is any way to save the ship.


The book is Government Pirates, and you can read more at Hugh Hewitt's blog.

Self-Promotion Part II


Part I

This bit of self-aggrandizement isn't even a little bit better. It made me gag a little bit.
Tip to Josh Marshall

Clotheslines

We had a clothesline in our old house- the little one where Shasta and the Equuschick will live. We had a clothesline at our house in Colorado- the HM put it up for me. We had one, in fact, at every house we've ever lived in that I can remember. I love them. In addition to the energy savings, there's just something wonderful about the smell of sun-dried clothes that nothing else can duplicate. I don't think they are unsightly at all- I think they are a thing of beauty and a joy forever. But I guess it's like the smooth expanse of green velvet grass, devoid of all the lovely wildflowers- in the eye of the beholder:

American Public Radio's Media's "Marketplace" yesterday featured a report on the unglamorous but eminently sensible technological apparatus known as the clothesline.

You can read a transcript of the report at this link -- "Clotheslines: Energy saver or eyesore?" -- but you really owe it to yourself to click on the "listen to this story" link to hear for yourself the voice of the appalling Ceil Bell, a board member of a Timonium, Md., "homeowners' association" that prohibits clotheslines.

"Clothes drying is just unsightly," Bell says. "You get people hanging towels over the railings, you get clotheslines in the backyard. We just don't like the look of it. It looks like a lower-class neighborhood."

Apparently Bell thinks people in "lower-class neighborhoods" are, as a rule, smarter and more sensible than the prodigal idiots the Timonium homeowners' association hopes to attract.


It's good stuff- you should read it all. Did you know there's even an organized 'right to dry' campaign to protect home-owners from bullying covenants that prevent line-drying?

We've had a clothesline just about everywhere we've lived, and we used it, too. My great-grandparents had almost no yard at all, but they installed a retractable clothesline from their detached garage to the back side of their house- on laundry day, the clothesline could be pulled out and attached, crossing the driveway, and when the laundry was done, the clothesline was retracted. There were clotheslines strung across the ceiling in the full basement, too, so in wet weather and during the winter, the clothes could still be air dried.


Our yard is so shady and so full of holes (Donovan dog likes to dig) that we just haven't figured out a good place- but I had a brainstorm this month. We do have a second story deck. And we have all those trees around the perimeters of the yard. So why not install a pulley system like I've seen in pictures of old New York City tenements?
Lehman's has one for 35.00 (If you haven't shopped at LEhman's before, you should take a look- they have some very practical things). Amazon also has something I think would work.
We'd attach one end to the deck- or to a taller support the HM will attach to the deck, and the other end to a tree across the yard. That would raise the lines (and clothes) out of the way of the shade, the passing dogs, the dust the Donovan dog digs up and sends flying, and some of the inevitable insects you get when you line-dry. The deck gets full sun all day long (an over-sight on our part, but it could be turned to good use)- so we could even dry clothes from the deck when the weather is cooler.

Self Promotion

I don't think you become a politician because of your healthy dose of humility. I don't expect politicians to be genuinely self-effacing.

But isn't distributing these fliers to the public so they'll show up with them at your campaign rally in Germany just a bit, well, strange? Or do those of who did not grow up in the Facebook age just not relate to this kind of self-branding and self-promotion?

If that's the case, I'm in good company. The Anchoress has much more to say about it- and she's more coherent, too. Lots of good links.

Patrick Ruffini has something say about it, too:

The German flyers bear Obama's campaign logo and say "Paid for by Obama for America."

I'm surprised at this lapse in judgment in an otherwise well-oiled and professional Obama campaign. The last time they printed up campaign paraphenalia in a foreign language, it didn't work out so hot for them.

So, this isn't just some sober, high-minded foreign policy speech, part of a foreign trip occurring under the auspices of his official Senate office. It is a campaign rally occuring on foreign soil. They are using the same tactics to turn out Germans to an event as they would to any rally right here in America.

The Obama people previously said this wasn't a political event. But then again, I don't expect politicians to tell the truth, either.

Not Like the Joneses

What a novel idea:

Waiting until we can afford to buy something and trying to make do with what we currently have is how most people used to live. We're learning patience, we're learning flexibility, and we're learning to be content with what we have.

... I'd much prefer to wait until I can afford something before I buy it. I much prefer not having to live paycheck-to-paycheck. And I much prefer not being slave to the bondage of debt.

We're living like no one else so that someday we can live and give like no one else!

Would It Be Obnoxious....

To print out this list of commonly misused and abused words and phrases ('give up the goat?') to hand out to people who make me wince when they misuse and abuse one of them?

Yes, I thought it might.

What Sort of 1930s Housewife Are You?

Thanks, Meredith, this was fun!

77

As a 1930s wife, I am
Very Superior

Take the test!



Um, since I am a home-schooler and am on a couple of homeschooling email lists, I did check that I am an active member of a child study group.

Like Meredith, I fail to wash the lid of the milk carton.

I was able to say that I do not slow up card games with chatter- but fortunately for me they didn't ask about the way I do slow up card games- with singing. It's a sort of game the girls and I sometimes play, whereby via random association and stream of consciousness we see who can keep up the conversation by responding with the most snatches of song. It's hard to explain, but I understand it can be extremely bewildering to the uninitiated.

I took it for my husband, too:

153

As a 1930s husband, I am
Very Superior

Take the test!



Which is no surprise at all.

The Best Way To Cut Back Fuel Consumption

Here's a pretty detailed article, but what stood out to me is this one point:

It should come as no surprise that driving less has the greatest impact on consumption since no gasoline is expended. The problem is that people are already driving an efficient routes from point A-B because longer routes take more time, and people have been trying to save time since cars became a necessity. Perhaps I should add this as an assumption, but I don’t see people taking roundabout ways while running errands or commutting. But there must be at least a few percentage points in inefficiency or “slack” built into our daily driving. This assumption is based on the belief that everyone is not a delivery or taxi driver who knows the most efficient routes from point A-B.

If we cut 5% from the per capita mileage, we cut our gasoline usage by 5%. However things don’t move 5% closer. So how can we save that 5%?

This is the idea I like:
The fastest way to cut that 5% would be for companies to allow those who can to do so to telecommute one day a week. While the majority of the workforce would not be able to do this, telecommuting would allow some to save 20% of their commute. As firms are recognizing that it can earn them some “green” credentials, it may become more common; however only a minority of the workforce works at a job where this is physically feasible let alone tolerated.


The tolerated bit is what needs to change. While my husband can't do most of his job from home, there are some things he can do from home with a laptop and cellphone. He asked for those things when he was hired, and his boss said no. His boss is a very, very nice man- he has been so good to us I can't even talk about it without getting choked up- and I know when I have tried to think him, he gets choked up. He's a good man. So why did he say no? Because technological awareness is just behind the times in our area- five years ago our local ISP told us there were about 100 high speed internet clients in the entire county. When I joined the local homeschool group and was asked to volunteer to run the phone chain, I asked why we didn't have an email group instead- and the majority just looked at me with blank stares. They didn't know what an email list was or how one worked.
Incidentally, the HM's boss eventually came around- last year the HM got the laptop and cell phone, along with a company vehicle and a gas card, which has amounted to a steady month paycheck increase as gas prices have mounted. He hasn't been able to stay home a full day- but as the regional manager for stores in five different cities, the the laptop and cellphone have saved him some unnecessary trips.

Shasta's job, on the other hand, is one he could do entirely from home, every day of the week. He could probably show up quarterly, and work from home the rest of the time. His employers say no, which makes us very sad, and is the reason this article caught my attention. To make telecommuting more feasible, employers themselves are going to need to be educated on the benefits, and they'll need to be foresighted enough to set up the business to work that way in the first place.

It's kind of hard to talk an employer into telecommuting when the employer has thousands of dollars invested in a physical location and office equipment, supplies, and materials that could become redundant if everybody works from home.

There are other things we can do, of course, and Scott Kirwin goes into them. More fuel efficient cards- which is not much of an option for a family of nine with three large dogs. They don't make them fuel efficient and capable of transporting large families and their friends.

We can walk or bicycle more- but when you live 9 or 10 miles from town in an area with blizzards in the winter and thunderstorms in the summer- that's not terribly feasible. Oh, plus there's the 9 members of the family issue again- and now we have to account for those too young or too incapacitated to bike.

Which doesn't mean you shouldn't do it.=)

Meanwhile, we stay at home more, cut back on trips, and combine errands. Except we've already been doing that for years.

Berea College

This is a story about a story- Mark Stricherz at GetReligion comments on a NYT story:

Except for one small detail, Tamar Lewin of The New York Timeswrote a memorable story about the debate over rising tuition costs at American universities. Lewin focused on Berea College in Kentucky, a tiny school that does not charge its students admission, and contrasted it with other universities.


And, indeed, it is a well written story and it bisects a handful of Common Room interests (of course, we're nosy sorts, we're interested in just about everything). Stricherz notes, however, a curious omission from Lewin's story, one indicative of a rather large blind spot typical of the Times and other media. Berea does what it does the way it does because of its underlying philosophy, because of the sort of school it is- a Christian school. And Lewin never mentions that.
Stricherz gives us the preamble to Berea's mission statement:
Berea College, founded by ardent abolitionists and radical reformers, continues today as an educational institution still firmly rooted in its historic purpose “to promote the cause of Christ.” Adherence to the College’s scriptural foundation, “God has made of one blood all peoples of the earth,” shapes the College’s culture and programs so that students and staff alike can work toward both personal goals and a vision of a world shaped by Christian values, such as the power of love over hate, human dignity and equality, and peace with justice. This environment frees persons to be active learners, workers, and servers as members of the academic community and as citizens of the world. The Berea experience nurtures intellectual, physical, aesthetic, emotional, and spiritual potentials and with those the power to make meaningful commitments and translate them into action.


On the 'About the College' Page of Berea's website one may read the following:
The College has an inclusive Christian character, expressed in its motto "God has made of one blood all peoples of the Earth."


Incidentally, in another point where this story crosses one of the many topics of interest to The Common Room Denizens, this story's genus was in this action by the Senate Finance Committee:
In January, the Senate Finance Committee requested detailed endowment and spending data from 136 colleges and universities with endowments of at least $500 million, with a possible eye to forcing them to spend at least 5 percent of their assets each year, as foundations are required to do. Large, tax-free endowments “should mean affordable education for more students, not just a security blanket for colleges,” said Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, who is reviewing the data.

The commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service’s tax-exempt section said this spring that he wanted his agency to be more aggressive in ensuring that universities made “appropriate use” of their endowments. And officials in Massachusetts are studying a proposal for a 2.5 percent tax on the part of university endowments greater than $1 billion — a threshold exceeded by nine of the state’s universities.

And Berea's President Shinn points out that decisions made for his college by politicians miles removed from Berea by both space and worldview have unintended consequences- like so many political decisions:
President Shinn recently had an opportunity to tell the distinctive story of Berea’s historical commitment to low-income families and our four-year scholarships for all students in response to the request from U.S. Senators Baucus’ (D – Montana) and Grassley (R – Iowa). They were seeking information regarding institutional data and procedures on endowment spending from 136 schools with endowments of more than $1 billion. At Berea College, approximately 78% of our annual operating budget is funded by our endowment – a fact that is not matched by any other American college or university. President Shinn also was able to point out that any national policies on required endowment spending could affect Berea College in ways unintended by the policymakers.

Gas Breaks for Me, But Not For Thee

Thee, after all, is merely the hoi polloi. Me, in this case, is the DNC Committee members in Denver:

Ah, the appearance of impropriety. Or illegality. The City of Denver, which is hosting the Democratic National Convention next month was apparently providing DNC committee members with the ability to fill their gas tanks on taxpayer dime - by letting them skip paying state and federal gas taxes. The practice, which began four months ago, may have ended hours after its disclosure.

So Then, Wouldn't They Cease to Be Civilians?

From LaShawn Barber:

On July 2, Obama gave a speech to an audience of what appears to be military veterans. Relevant to this post is this nugget (emphasis added):

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”


What would that look like?

The week after the “security force” statements, Obama likened Immigration and Customs Enforcement to terrorists, simply for doing the job of enforcing immigration laws! He made this statement before members and supporters of the hispanic racialist group La Raza. Two seemingly opposing statements uttered before two different audiences.

Future president of the United States, what would this proposed civilian national security force do, exactly? Will it profile Muslims, or help secure the border, like the Minuteman group, whom George Bush called vigilantes? May it conduct immigration raids, which certainly are part of national security? If so, how do you reconcile “terrorizing” illegal aliens with immigration raids and forming a quasi-military force of civilians to help the military “achieve national security objectives?”

What does that mean?


More at LaShawn's, with links.

I'm a bit baffled myself. What did he mean?

FLDS July 23

The Grand Jury has issued sealed indictments against Warren Jeffs, who is already in jail, and five members of the FLDS-- their names are not yet released, probably pending their arrests:

Jeffs was charged with sexually assaulting a child - a first-degree felony that could carry a life prison sentence - and four other unnamed defendants were indicted for allegedly sexually assaulting young girls under the age of 17.

The last unnamed defendant was charged with three counts of failure to report child abuse.


The state collected at least 599 DNA samples. They had approximately 450 children in custody, so that means around 150 DNA samples were from adults. And they found four adults to accuse of marrying under--aged girls, in a Grand Jury process that I've been told could result in indicting a ham sandwich or Mother Teresa if that's what the DA wants.

I was going to hazard a guess as to the sixth person was, the one charged with failure to report child abuse. But then I thought better of it, since I could be wrong, and this is how slander, libel, and gossip get started. Not only that, but it seems I was certainly wrong, as my guess for the sixth person was a female, and according to this story, it's a man:

The names of the others, all members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, will not be released until they are arrested. It is not known whether the men are in Texas, or even in the United States.

Sheriff David Doran said it was likely the arrests would be handled by the Texas Rangers with his office assisting. He offered little other information about the indictments.

One of the five men indicted also was charged with bigamy. The sixth man was charged with failure to report child abuse, the only misdemeanor charge.


This may not be the last of the indictments:
The grand jury will meet again Aug. 21 to hear more evidence against the group, but this first set of indictments is considered a needed win for the state of Texas.

Look, I'm not going to defend the marrying off of child brides, but I don't see how this is a 'win' for the state of Texas. Whatever they find now does not retroactively justify the removal of the 450 children in the first place. They aren't getting the evidence they are using to indict these men from the children- they are getting it from documents removed from the ranch in the early days of the raid- documents they could have seized without holding the children (and a number of adults misidentified as minors).
Finding FLDS Member B guilty of marrying a 15 year old is not going to justify holdilng a 37 year old woman in custody and refusing her access to an attorney because the state insists that 37 year old is a minor child.

YOu know that saying about two wrongs not making a right? Well, here's another point- whatever the FLDS members may have done, they did as private citizens. What the state did, it did under cover of law.
Several of the women called to testify apparently pleaded the fifth, and I will hazard a guess that this probably had as much to do with possible bigamy charges as anything else.

Before the indictments were announced at about 6:30 p.m., the proceedings slowed to a crawl, sources told the Houston Chronicle, over questions on whether immunity offered by the state to female FLDS members could protect them from prosecution for federal crimes.

The issue was eventually cleared up, but officials would not say how, nor would they talk about the grand jury proceedings, which are secret.

State District Judge Barbara Walther was called to the secret proceedings and presided in a room separate from the grand jury, sources told the Chronicle. Witnesses who continued to take the Fifth Amendment privilege not to testify, even though they had immunity but feared federal prosecution, reportedly were instructed about their rights and possible contempt charges if they declined to cooperate.


A few more details here:
A sixth member of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints was indicted on three counts of failure to report child abuse, Abbott said.

Jeffs, already convicted of being an accomplice to rape in Utah and awaiting trial in Arizona on other charges related to underage marriages, is accused of assaulting a girl in Texas in January 2005, according to the indictment issued Tuesday.

"Our investigation in this matter is not concluded," said Abbott, whose office is acting as the special prosecutor in the case.

The grand jury in this tiny West Texas ranching community will continue considering other criminal charges Aug. 21, according to a source who spoke on the condition of anonymity because proceedings of the panel are secret by law.


Teresa Jeffs is still trying to get a different attorney:
A motion filed by Teresa Jeffs in Schleicher County said the "personal behavior" of attorney Natalie Malonis, who represents her in an ongoing child welfare investigation, demonstrates "choices that brought her judgment, lifestyle and her ability to cope with responsibilities and obligations into question."
The filing does not offer further specifics, but said it was referring to events that began in 2000. Malonis said she had no idea what events the motion refers to and said her personal life is not relevant.
Teresa Jeffs' filing also says her personal conflicts with Malonis have "rendered their relationship counterproductive."
The rift between Malonis and Teresa Jeffs first became public last month, after the attorney sought a temporary restraining order to keep a spokesman for the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints away from her client.
Malonis claimed FLDS member Willie Jessop was influencing the girl, who has denied having a sexual relationship but has declined to discuss whether she is married.

I don't think at this point it really matters whether Malonis is doing her best by her client or not- Malonis told everybody that Teresa had a baby- and she didn't. Malonis waited until the weekend had passed before seeking to have the records on Jeffs' most recent court involvement sealed- and those records included her diaries and love notes she wrote. There is almost no 16 year old girl in the world who would trust her attorney again under those circumstances.
On June 19, Teresa Jeffs wrote a letter to 51st District Judge Barbara Walther asking that Malonis be replaced. Since then, her new filing said, Malonis has "argued, cajoled, threatened and all but called the child a liar."
Malonis also sent the teen emails "berating" her on a number of issues, it said, including her appearance before the Schleicher County grand jury.
[...]
The new court document, filed on behalf of Teresa Jeffs by defense attorney Alan Futrell, says the relationship between Malonis and Teresa Jeffs has become "so fractious and untenable" it can not continue.
Walther refused to consider replacing Malonis at hearing in June. On Thursday, she canceled a hearing set for Monday on the same issue. On Friday, a guardian ad litem for Teresa Jeffs filed the documents referring to the alleged 2006 marriage. The documents were leaked to a Texas newspaper that day.
A Tom Green County District Court clerk said on Monday the judge has still not authorized the public release of the documents.


Brooke Adams looks into the Lost Boy story:
In a New York Times story published last year, Shannon Price of the Diversity Foundation, set up by ex-FLDS member Dan Fischer to assist the teens, said 500 to 1,000 teens or young men have left in the past six years.

Does the number matter?

Yes, because government resources (tax dollars) are being directed to legislation, social programs and prosecution on behalf of the teens. The Lost Boys will, no doubt, come up at Thursday's Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing.

And yes because there are repeated calls for the public to help the teens, such as the ''I Need A Dad'' campaign Fischer and Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff tried to launch a few years ago on the steps of the Utah Capitol.

And yes because critics attribute the Lost Boy phenomenon to a need to drive out males to reduce the competition for wives.

Males outnumber females significantly in the preschool age group, slightly in the 10 to 14 age group and somewhat in the 15 to 19 age group.

It appears to me that the biggest issue with the Lost Boys isn't that so many of them are kicked out- the facts just don't seem to support that there's a huge discrepancy between the numbers of boys who leave or are forced out of FLDS homes and the number of boys in the same situation in Non FLDS homes. What might be a problem is that FLDS boys who leave or are kicked out are less prepared to fit in to mainstream society. Because, um, their parents weren't planning on them fitting into mainstream society- they were planning on them fitting into FLDS society.
Michelle Benward of New Frontiers for Families told me last summer that the No. 1 reason she is given for why the teens have left the community is they do not want to follow the religion or support Warren Jeffs. Reason No. 2 is that they got pressured or kicked out for trivial misdeeds, such as watching unapproved movies.

I have interviewed a dozen or more of these teens and heard similar stories: They left or were asked to leave home after disputes with their parents over clothing, music, movies, girlfriends/boyfriends, money, religion or substance abuse problems.

These are the same reasons teens leave home everywhere else in America, although the tolerance level for nonconforming behavior is far lower and the expectations for conformity much higher in the FLDS community.

Another problem would be that the FLDS boys stand out as members of a group- the same ratio of teens may end up running away or getting kicked out in other families (which is not to say I approve of it- I just know several families where the boy chose the highway when given the 'my way or highway' option.)- but the others are seen as individuals, rather than representative. That's just my guess, btw.
Elsewhere in society when children are rebellious parents are supposed to deal with it the best they can and not just turn them out on the street. But FLDS parents have been told to cut off their wayward children by their leaders.


Thursday, at 3:00 ET, Jeri Lyn Ward is devoting a streaming internet broadcast she does at Right Talk Radio to the upcoming hearings where the Senate is hearing from everybody with a vendetta against the FLDS, and none of those who are actually in the group. She'll be talking with Kurt, Bill Medvecky, and, if we wrap up The Cherub's appointment to be fitted for a new leg brace in a timely manner, Yours Truly. I expect to sound like a blithering idiot and I'm kind of cringing (have I mentioned I write MUCH better than I talk?)- but if you're interested....
You can even call in to ask questions, at 1-866-884-8255 (TALK). Please be gentle.
------------------
Update: I meant to add this information from these two stories, as well:
From mysanantonio:
Two members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints — Sarah Barlow Draper and Leann Jeffs — were escorted by their attorneys to the grand jury room on the Schleicher County courthouse square shortly before 5 p.m.

Draper, 37, could be seen daubing tearful eyes before she reentered the room. Attorney Andrea Sloan patted Jeffs, 17, her client, on the back before she too headed into the grand jury room.

The Texas Attorney General’s office had offered female FLDS members immunity from prosecution in exchange for their testimony, said two sources familiar with the discussions who spoke on condition of anonymity.


In addition to testimony from Teresa Jeffs, the state heard from:
Leann Jeffs, 17, who has a 1-year-old daughter.

Draper, 37, a registered nurse and mother of four. She now works at a hospital in Abilene where she lives with her children. She was once misclassified as a minor by Texas Child Protective Services but proved to a court she was not. She is the former wife of ousted FLDS member Daniel Barlow, who was once mayor of Colorado City, Ariz., where the FLDS is mostly based.

Veda Keate, 19, who was forced to give a third DNA sample to the Texas Attorney General’s Office earlier this month. It is not clear why another was needed. She has a 2-year-old daughter.

Annette Jeffs, Warren Jeffs’ first wife and the mother of the 16-year-old who was also called to testify.

Although I've read elsewhere that Annette Jeffs wasn't called in to testify after all. We've written about Sarah Barlow Draper before- she's a very lovely lady, but no, I don't think she looks like a 16 year old. She does look young- I would have guessed late 20s at most, and she's 37.

Modern Pharisee suggests that the state has played some serious hardball with the two women above who have children- if they are jailed for contempt of court, the state could take away their children again, and after what they've just been through, that's that threat would be all too real.
Incidentally, the members of the Grand Jury all come from the local community, which has been trying to oust the FLDS ever since they arrived, and has been responsible for some of the most contradictory and strange rumors about the group (the crayons story, for instance).

Texas hopes to extradite Warren Jeffs, and says it will pursue the other subjects of indictment 'aggressively.'
Of the men indicted Tuesday, five where charged with felony sexual assault of a child, and one of them also was charged with felony bigamy. A sixth man was charged with a misdemeanor, failing to report child abuse.
After appearing before the Grand Jury, Willie Jessop said
told reporters that he hoped there would be no criminal charges, and said the grand jury proceedings were "a continued harassment" of the sect.

"Our ladies are upset, they've been in the sun all day," said Mr. Jessop, who was subpoenaed to testify Tuesday. The state "has spent millions of dollars on this, and now they've got to justify it."

The state on Tuesday released a new estimate that exceeds $12.5 million for the cost of the raid at the polygamist ranch and its aftermath.

I wonder if the other men will, like JEffs was, be put on the FBI's ten most wanted list. For a little perspective on that- The crime Jeffs was accused of committing was accessory to rape, which was the action of performing the wedding ceremony of a 14 year old girl to her 19 year old half-cousin (they had the same grand-father, but not the same grand-mother), and fleeing from justice. Meanwhile, a member of the bloody LeBaron polygamous group who was accused of murder (the LeBaron group is known to be responsible for almost three dozen murders), and has been on the run for years was only just now placed on the FBI's most wanted list- and she still hasn't made the 'Top Ten.' There's something just a little skewed about this.

I think it's quite understandable that the FLDS feel persecuted-

Throughout a long day of testimony on Tuesday, several sect women wearing dark-colored prairie dresses filed into and out of the courtroom, some leaving almost as soon as they arrived, and others wiping their eyes with tissues.

One 25-year-old sect member who identified himself as Ben said the women all invoked their Fifth Amendment rights not to testify.

By midafternoon, the grand jury proceeding appeared to have ground to a halt, and the same district judge who ordered the removal of the sect's children in April arrived to try to sort things out.

Yep, they're sure to feel like they're getting an unbiased judgment here.
The SLTrib, after an embarrassing gaffe last night when they said there were no indictments, has corrected their story and added a bit more detail:

Some witnesses have been asked to return to another grand jury session scheduled for Aug. 21, a signal the criminal investigation into the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is ongoing.
Willie Jessop, an FLDS spokesman, said late Tuesday that the sect will address the allegations "head on."
"As soon as we know who they are looking for we will make contact with the sheriff's office and make arrangements for those people to appear on the charges," he said.

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Mandatory Calorie Count

New York City's regulation requiring the conspicuous posting of calorie counts on restaurants' menu boards was supposed to apply just to big chains that standardize their dishes and already do (or can easily afford) nutritional analyses. But A.P. reports that the threshold for the rule, 15 or more outlets nationwide, is low enough to include obscure local chains and quasi-chains:

"This has been an absolute nightmare," said Enrique Almela, director of operations at Singas Famous Pizza, which has 17 restaurants, most in the borough of Queens....

Almela spoke with The Associated Press from his car Wednesday as he rushed sample pizzas to a food laboratory. He said the calorie tests for his 35 different pizza combinations will cost $10,000, and he doubts they will produce accurate data.

"I may put 15 pepperoni on a pie. Someone else may put 12. We don't measure the amount of cheese we put on," he said. "If you put up roundabout numbers, how does that help anyone?"


And what happens if your pepperoni supplier changes the formula for their pepperoni, or your canned tomato sauce company starts adding more corn syrup to its products, or your restaurant serves friend food and the cook on Monday uses more oil than the cook on Tuesday?

More at Reason.

The Fairness Doctrine

And why it's not very fair.

A Conclusion Drawn

Be who God made you to be. When God made His unique plan for you, He tailored it to the unique person He intended you to be. If you fight your identity as God created it, you fight His plan for you. His plan can't work if you aren't you.

Do you limit God? By no means. God will have foreseen your failure, and you had best believe another will come to fulfill the purpose that should have been yours. But you, you will always feel your purpose to be frustrated.

Yellowcake found in Iraq

550 metric tons of it.

That's Funny

From Josh Marshall:

Indeed, the political press's reckless and giddy love for McCain is so universally acknowledged that McCain himself has often joked about the press as his "base." So what do we have here but a candidate who can't brook the idea of not campaigning on a wave of press adulation? And now he's framing his whole candidacy around a campaign of strategic whining about the claim that the political press is treating his younger opponent like he's been treated for over a decade. He's got the preening and envy of a sore losing runner-up for prom queen.

The Boy's Current Bible Study Program

I recently confessed that I bought Weird & Gross Bible Stuff, by Rick Osborne, Quentin Guy, Ed Strauss, and I'm still not really sure what I was thinking.

But we are using it, and I thought I'd explain how. There are a lot of things I don't care for about it, and this particular section illustrates almost all of them (I also think the illustrations are ugly):

One day a prophet of God told the idol-worshiping king Jeroboam that God was going to bring down his pagan altars. Well, Jeroboam wasn't going to let some religious whackhammer spoil his lovely altars. Jeroboam shouted, "Grab him!" and angrily pointed a pinkie at the prophet. Suddenly, his hand shriveled up like dried fruit, and the altar cracked open and spilled all its ashes (1Kings 13:4-5). Jeroboam finally learned that it's not polite to point.


That constitutes the entire section on this episode. The next paragraph is about Zimri, king for a week who burned down the castle over his own head. And the paragraph after that is about Jezebel being tossed out the castle window, her body eaten by dogs (including the suggestion that she probably gave them indigestion and bad breath).

Sigh. So, among other things, the accounts are choppy, incomplete, lacking context, and sometimes irrelevant, also irreverent. I can't fix that last. But all these things that make the book to flawed for us to use as a stand alone do make those paragraphs good introductory comments before plunging into the actual biblical account, and since he reads it in the KJV, I hope that helps a bit with the style and reverence issues.

To begin with, I gave the Boy a small ruler and a couple colored pencils. I bookmarked the verses mentioned in the introduction and instructed him to look them up as he read the intro, and to underline certain ones in yellow. Then I gave him a list of easy questions to answer about those verses to ease him into it.
Answer me
these questions three:
1. Three of the verses you looked up were in the Old Testament. Who was the subject of the New Testament verse? What are the ways that He grew? (the verse was Luke 2:52, and Jesus grew in wisdom....)
2. Where do we read of a naked prophet?
3. What is a merry heart like?

For the first two chapters, instead of bookmarking the verses, I wrote down the page numbers where they are found in his Bible. But instead of reading only the one or two scant verses referred to in the book, he had to read the whole account (sometimes an entire chapter or two, sometimes just a dozen verses or so). I wrote a question or comment about the passage in question on a sticky note and put it either in his Bible or in his book. So, for the Jeroboam section transcribed above, I wrote in his book, "Page 469 in your Bible. Read 13:1-10. What else did Jeroboam learn?

In one section the book says that the way king Herod died is so gross they can't even tell the readers- but they don't give a verse. So I wrote there, "Ask Mom to show you how to use the concordance so you can find out how Herod died."

In another passage, the Bible refers to Judah and Simeon going to war, but it's the tribes of Judah and Simeon, not the two brothers, so I wrote down, "After you read this go see Mom and ask her to tell you more about Judah and Simeon."

At the end of the first chapter there's a list of bullet points:
'The kings we have just read about made a royal mess. To get coller means avoiding the kind of stupid mistakes they made. Three keys to being a godly leader are:
  • Do things God's way.
  • Take care of- and care for- the people you lead.
  • Don't start thinking God gave you the job because you're his gift to the world and better than every one else. Watch out! God looks for humble men when he's looking for leaders.

For the first bullet point I asked the Boy to name a leader from the Bible who did things Gods way.
For the second point, I ask him to name some ways his Daddy takes care of and cares for the people he leads, either at work or at home.
For the third point, I asked him to name a king who failed when he started thinking the reason for his success was because he was all that.

After a couple more chapters, I 'll stop adding the page numbers and he'll have to find the references on his own. We'll incorporate more work with the concordance and mapwork, and add a few figures to the timeline from time to time. Sometimes I'll give him a verse to add to his copywork book, and other times I'll ask him to choose one. He'll continue to read entire chapters instead of two verses, and he'll be asked to narrate the story from the Bible rather than from the Wird and Groos book. And we'll keep using the choppy paragraphs as introductory interest grabbers rather than complete readings.

All of which is not intended as a hearty endorsement, but as one example of how you can take a flawed and disappointing text and make it work for you.

(Another would be to use it for kindling, but I get hives when I think about burning a book.)

For the Phone Phobic

Call directly to somebody's voicemail and leave a message. Is it tacky to leave a message saying, 'Call me back?'

Probably.

The Story of an Art Forgery

THE FORGER'S SPELL

A True Story of Vermeer, Nazis, and the Greatest Art Hoax of the Twentieth Century
By Edward Dolnick

Another book on my reading list, which list strangely does not shrink no matter how much I read.

Here are some excerpts from the review at Washington Post:

In Amsterdam at the close of World War II, a dapper little man named Han van Meegeren, a noted art dealer, faced a charge of collaboration with the Nazis. At issue was a painting by Johannes Vermeer that had found its way, with Van Meegeren's help, into the hands of Reich Marshall Hermann Goering, Hitler's second in command. If the court found him guilty, Van Meegeren faced a death sentence. For several days the prisoner had been vague about his role in the transaction, but at length, under persistent questioning, his composure broke: "Idiots!" he yelled. "You think I sold a Vermeer to that fat Goering. But it's not a Vermeer. I painted it myself!"

Well. Who could read that and not be curious to know more?

Vermeer was increasingly popular during the Nazi era- Dutch collectors wanted to keep their National Treasure's work out of Nazi hands, and Nazis, of course, hated to have anything kept out of their hands. Since there are only about 36 known Vermeers, this mad competition drove prices into the stratosphere. Like a good capitalist, Van Meegeren figured out how to help create a supply to meet the demand.
Over a long period of rigorous trial and error, he developed a process that made him, according to one expert, "the Edison of art forgers." It was not enough simply to mimic Vermeer's technique; Van Meegeren diligently recreated the artist's original materials, down to the lead-based paints and marten-hair brushes.

Then he had to develop the processes that gave his recent work the patina it would have acquired over the three centuries since Vermeer last painted.
Critics had scorned his original work, so it must have been gratifying to turn around and deceive the world while raking in massive sums of money.
"Yesterday this picture was worth millions of guilders, and experts and art lovers would come from all over the world and pay money to see it," he declared after his exposure. "Today, it is worth nothing, and nobody would cross the street to see it for free. But the picture has not changed. What has?" ·

More on Ancient Manuscripts

For those interested in the release online of the Codex Sinaticus, you might also enjoy perusing this website, where you can look at an older fragment- Paul's letters, dating from 200-300 AD. That could be a fun homeschooling assignment.

I put this in the comments of the earlier post, but I'll repost here with a couple revisions:
what's really interesting about this (to me) is the date of the oldest single MS of a complete NT- 350 AD. In addition, we have fragments that are from the end of the 1st/beginning of 2nd century, and we have individual books from the 2nd and 3rd century.
There's a fragment of Matthew from AD30-70 (the Magdalen Papyrus) (whoops- I looked further, and this particular dating is somewhat controversial, most put it at around 100-200 AD); one of Mark and Romans thru Hebrews from AD 70.

For some context, the oldest surviving manuscript for about half of Plato’s dialogues is from 895 AD (in the Bodliean)- that's a gap of around 1200 years between the original and our oldest copy, and only one surviving MS that old.

The Iliad was probably in existence in the 8th century BC, but the oldest surviving copies we have are merely fragments from six hundred years later, the 2nd or 3rd century BC.

Then there's this really fascinating bit of manuscript history

"The Archimedes Palimpsest contains seven of the Greek mathematician's treatises. Most importantly, it is the only surviving copy of On Floating Bodies in the original Greek, and the unique source for the Method of Mechanical Theorems and Stomachion. The manuscript was written in Constantinople (present day Istanbul) in the 10th century."

Archimedes lived in the 3rd century B.C.- so we're talking about a gap of 1300 years between when he lived and wrote and when we have the oldest surviving copy of what he wrote, and only a single copy at that.

The New Testament, like no other ancient book, is attested to by hundreds of surviving copies within 300 years of the originals. There are some interesting tables here to give this some context (note: I was interested in the tables comparing dates and copies of other ancient manuscripts, I'm not reading the entire page, and can't tell you whether I agree with the rest or not).

There are some 650, roughly, surviving manuscripts of the Iliad- and that's the most for any other ancient book except one. Next would be copies of works by Demosthenes (200, most incomplete), and Sophocles (193). For the New Testament? Try 24,000.
Since there are so many thousands more copies of the New Testament manuscripts than there all the other ancient books put together, naturally there are also more variants than in other books.
However- the variants are largely issues of word order, spelling, and other minor issues that do not alter the meaning of the text. Not a single one would alter standard orthodox Christian doctrine.
With so many surviving manuscripts, textual variations resulting from copyists' and translators' errors are only to be expected. However, out of the roughly 20,000 lines in the NT, only about 40 are in doubt. By way of comparison Homer's Iliad, which has the next largest number of extant manuscripts, has 15,600 lines, of which 764 (5 percent) are in doubt.


The single passage which is most questionable- going merely by issues of date, scholarship, and which manuscripts it appears in- is that favorite story of unbelievers everywhere- the one where a woman caught in adultery is brought before Jesus to be stoned, and He says that the one without sin should cast the first stone. All the accusers slink away, and He tells her that He won't condemn her, either, but she should go and sin no more (that part always seems to be missed by those who don't actually believe in the Christian Jesus but want to quote this passage anyway). The fact that of all the New Testament, this single passage is the one with the least historical support tickles my obnoxious funny bone (for the record, I believe the passage belongs in the Bible, I'm not questioning it- I just think it's ironic that the one most favored by unbelievers is also the one with the weakest scholarly support- the other would be the last 12 verses of Mark).

And this is interesting, too:
Another remarkable feature of the New Testament is the extent to which it is cited in early Christian writings. The works of Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Tertullian, Hippolytus and Eusebius between them contain over 36,000 quotations. A total of over 86,000 citations have been documented, although not all of these are literal quotations. The scope of these citations is so extensive that it has been estimated that the entire New Testament, barring just eleven verses, can be found in quotations from church sources of the second and third centuries!

The NYT and McCain

The Anchoress has a very good collection of links and summing up of just what this particular brouhaha is all about- and it's not really about McCain, it's about the press, again.

It's not like the media hides it's light o' love for Obama under a bushel, either. voters had already noticed.

Did You Know I am a High School Drop Out?

Crimson Wife at Bending the Twig notes that several homeschool organizations now suggest that California homeschoolers should stop using the term ISP and instead use

"private school satellite program" or "PSP".

Apparently, the California Department of Education has taken the position that only home study programs of government-run schools that comply with specific regulations in the CA Ed. Code are valid "independent study programs".

That this is even an issue at all just demonstrates the stupidity of government bureaucracy. The term "independent study program" has been around for many, many years. The Calvert School began offering one way back in 1905. There are private school ISP's and government-run ISP's. It seems ridiculous to limit the term to only the latter group just because of some narrow-minded educrats...


The phrase stupidity of government bureaucracy took me back.....

I think I've told this story before, but it fits right here. When I was just about to begin my senior year of high school my parents moved us from Arizona to California. IN Arizona I had enough credits to graduate mid-term. And the only credits I need to graduate mid-term were 3 electives and an English course of any sort (I tested out of the English requirements my freshman year and could take all English 'electives,' I just needed a set number of them). Electives!

In California, I didn't have enough credits to graduate in this century. Okay, I exaggerate. But I didn't have enough credits to graduate that year unless I convinced the school to waive my missing P.E. credits (AZ required one, CA 4), took a full load (7-8 classes a day for both semesters) and maybe a night school class or two.

Now I had taken summer school in AZ in order to get the required stuff out of the way so that I could graduate early. I did not enjoy school. I wasn't happy at being transplanted my senior year. I had given up a chunk of my summer to get required courses out of the way so I could leave institutionalized schooling behind me that much quicker. There was no way in the hot place that I was going to endure two full semesters of classes and night school just to walk the plank, I mean the stage, with a bunch of strangers.

Here's the real killer- one of the required classes in AZ was Government and Economics. That's one o