Friday, July 10, 2009

Obama Administration Policy On Transparency

Carol Browner, former Clinton administration EPA head and current Obama White House climate czar, instructed auto industry execs “to put nothing in writing, ever” regarding secret negotiations she orchestrated regarding a deal to increase federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards.


put nothing in writing, ever???

More at HotAir
.

Neo-Neocon has another example of the stonewalling lack of transparency in the White House:

Imagine, if you will, how the following would have been covered by the MSM if the administration in question had been a Republican one; I doubt that Byron York and the Washington Examiner would be the lonely voices letting us know that the Obama administration is stonewalling Congress by refusing to answer pertinent questions and figuring that they can probably get away with it.

And they are getting away with it—at least for now:

[Frank Trinity,] [a] top official of the Corporation for National and Community Service, the government agency that oversees AmeriCorps, has refused to answer questions from congressional investigators about the White House’s role in events surrounding the abrupt firing of inspector general Gerald Walpin…

“He said that’s a prerogative of the White House, so he didn’t feel at liberty to disclose anything regarding White House communications,” says one aide.

Investigators asked Trinity whether he was claiming executive privilege, something that could only be authorized by the president. Trinity answered again that it was a White House “prerogative.” When the investigators pointed out that, in the words of one aide, “there is no legal basis whatsoever” for such a claim, Trinity still declined to answer.

According to the knowledgeable sources, Trinity refused to say what contacts the Corporation had with the White House prior to the firing, or after the firing. He refused to say who at the Corporation had spoken to whom at the White House. He refused to say whether Corporation officials had discussed the specific reasons for the firing with the White House.

This is important because the White House claims to have conducted an “intensive review” prior to firing Walpin, in order to investigate what happened in Walpin’s final meeting with the Americorps board, the one at which the White House alleges Walpin acted “confused and disoriented.” But several members of the Board say they were not contacted by the administration, and Walpin asserts that neither was he nor any of his aides.

York reports that investigators “believe the Obama administration may be constructing an after-the-fact rationale for canning Walpin.” Ya think?

blog comments powered by Disqus