Monday, March 15, 2010

Boys and Girls Are Different. Really.

"The cardinal difficulty," said McPhee "in collaborations between the sexes is that women speak a language without nouns. If two men are doing a bit of work, one will say to the other, 'Put this bowl inside the bigger bowl which you'll find on the top shelf of the green cupboard.' The female for this is, 'Put that in the other one in there.' And then if you ask them, 'in where', they say, 'in there, of course.' There is consequently a phatic hiatus."
C.S Lewis, That Hideous Strength

I'd like to recommend two resources for those who are married to males, parenting boys, who are male, those who teach boys, or those who know a male. One is anything written by Leonard Sax. He has a Ph.D. in psychology and an M.D. degree.  His three year residency in family practice prepared him for the 18 years of private practice serving families in a small town north of D.C.

As I have heard it from another speaker, Sax was frustrated because teachers were repeatedly sending boys to him asking them to be put on ritalin, and he would send them back saying the boys were normal, and the teachers would refer them again. He wondered if teachers just did not know about the differences between boys and girls, and he tried to educate teachers of young children about this, and he found that not only did they NOT know, they were angry at his suggestion that they were different. They took umbrage, in fact. So he did more research and wrote these books.

Boys are in crisis- they live with their parents years longer than they used to, they don't have jobs, or at least not real jobs, and they don't really have a problem with that, they aren't going to college (but the girls are), and... well, there are a number of other markers indicating they are in crisis.  You can find that stuff elsewhere.  Here are the reasons Sax suggests they are having so many problems:
  • Video games. These addictive activities disengage boys from the world....
  • Teaching methods. Girls develop intellectually up to two years ahead of boys. Boys in grade school are naturally rambunctious. They need ways to express their native energy. They are being taught to read and write too early. Their mostly female teachers prefer compliant, dutiful girls.
  • Prescription drugs. Hyperactive, frustrated boys are increasingly being medicated. This we all know. What Sax claims is that these drugs shrink the motivational centres of the brain and that the effect of this lasts years, well after these kids stop taking their meds. I hadn't heard this before but if it's true, it is truly frightening.
  • Endocrine disruptors. Chemicals from plastic bottles, canned food linings and some shampoos mimic natural estrogen, the female hormone. Boys' testosterone levels are half of what they were in their grandfathers' day. Also, their bones are significantly more brittle.
  • The devaluation of masculinity. Boys don't know how to become men. They no longer have appropriate rights of passage. Once Father Knows Best was the paternalistic model but now he has been replaced (and mocked) by a dopey Homer Simpson. Sax likes the old virtues of courage and temperance, with a good measure of intelligence.

I would also recommend Andrew Pudewa's fantastic talk which you can download for only 3.00. It's called Teaching Boys & Other Children Who Would Rather Make Forts All Day. His website is here. You can also get his DVD of his very interesting, informative, and also amusing talk for only ten dollars.


These messages are very important for parents and teachers.  I think they are also very important for Sunday School teachers, because we have incorporated the public school model of the classroom into the Sunday School far too often, and it's not a model that is friendly to boys.

Some important differences between the sexes:

Hearing: You think boys aren't listening to you? They often really can't. Just as dogs hear frequencies people do not, boys have a narrower range of sounds they hear than girls do.  Dr. Sax says many boys labeled slow simply need their teachers to speak more loudly and more directly.   They also have trouble when young (this is a statistical thing, there will be individual exceptions) processing more than 8 words of instruction at a time. Mamas, we often talk too much and they just can't process it.

This has implications for girls, as well.  Studies on preemies showed that soft music played in their cribs really helped girl babies develop- they went home nearly two weeks earlier than babies without it.  However, it made no difference for boys, probably because they just couldn't hear that music.
Hearing is a brain function, and scientists can measure acoustic brain response in newborns and over time. Girl babies hear a 1,500 Hz tone about 80 percent greater than the average baby boy does. This is especially important because this range of sound is critical for understanding what others say. Other studies have demonstrated that the female/male differences increase as children get older.  Implications for the classroom: Not all boys and girls can be easily categorized by this information; situations vary, teacher styles vary. The important point is to consider the implications that would benefit both boys and girls. It has been demonstrated that noise levels that distract 11-year-old girls are 10 times softer than noise levels that distract boys.


My youngest girl insists that she has to do her schoolwork alone in another room, she cannot concentrate on her own reading out in the same room with the rest of us.  I thought she was just antisocial, although I did realize she is very distractable.  Now I suspect she really does struggle with the ambient noise three boys, 11, 5, and 3, can make.  Um.  Duh.

Color: we all have rods and cones in our retina.  But how many of each type is determined by our gender:
Rods are color blind. Cones are sensitive to color. They send their signals to the ganglion cells, some of which are large while others are small. They have different jobs. The large cells are wired to rods and are sensitive to motion. Think of them answering the questions, “where is it now and where is it going?” They are essentially a motion detector.The small cells answer the questions “what is it and what are the colors and textures?” The male retina has mostly the larger, thicker M (magnocellular) cells, which are essentially a motion detector and can track objects anywhere in the field of vision. The female retina has predominantly the smaller, thinner P (parvocellular) cells that are concentrated in and around the fovea, the center of the field of vision.
If boys’ eye structure is geared to motion, then looking out the window, out the classroom door, watching the classroom action and anything moving will catch their attention — they are wired for that. Looking at a worksheet, in the center field of vision, is better designed for the girls and their retinas.
Boys see and process speed, distance, movement, and direction more clearly and sharply than girls- again, in general.  Girls see and process color and texture more clearly and sharply than boys- again, in general. An individual boy or girl may be different, but in general, this is what we find.  And this explains to me why, when I had a hamper with three dividers for the whites, the reds, and the rest, my husband continually dropped all sorts of colors, including reds,  in the whites section, no matter how often I dug things out and resorted them, and even when I pinned a giant label to the correct sections of the hamper reading WHITES; REDS;  THE REST.  I finally gave up and now we just wash everything together.  He may have pink underwear, but since he can't tell the difference between pink and white, it doesn't matter.

This also explains to me why, last week when I told my son: "The tracing paper is in an orange box on the ledge over my bed, next to the curtain,"  he came back and told me it was not there.  I sent him again, rather forcefully insisting that he look, as we say around here, "like a woman."  He returned with the paper, explaining to me that it had been 'buried' under a bunch of stuff.  That 'stuff' was a library card, a driver's license, and two or three other items the same shape and size.
I guess the reason he could not see the bright orange box as well as I could because it wasn't moving.

Because they see more clearly movement, distance, and speed, the boys draw verbs, mostly with the black crayon.  Their drawings tend to be explosions, firing guns, crashing planets, and... movement.   Girls, who see color and texture more clearly, draw nouns- pretty cottages, flowers, grass, cute puppies or rabbits, and there is usually a rainbow (Mr. Pudewa forgot to mention the rainbow, but if you are a mother of girls, you know it's got to be there). Teachers tend to prefer pretty pictures of nouns with lots of pretty colors, contributing to the reason many boys learn as young as preschool that they aren't any good at school.

Pain- this one was amazing to me. Research shows that for  boys, pain increases the blood flow to the brain. For girls, it reduces the amount of blood to the brain. Pain sharpens a boy's thinking., but it makes girls kind of dim and confused (another reason women should not be in combat) If he's wrestling with a math problem and biting himself, this is actually a good thing. It helps him think.  What was really fascinating about this one is that, according to Mr. Pudewa, there were no exceptions found in the studies done.  100 percent of males were found to have an increase of blood flow to the brain when in pain.  100 percent of females had a decrease of blood flow under the same conditions (a balloon inserted in a formerly dark and private place and then inflated)- it didn't matter what sexual orientation the subjects were, either.

It turns out the 'fight or flight' response I learned about in school is largely a male response- researchers used to do research only on male animals because they believed the genders weren't really different enough to matter. But this is ironic, since the reason they preferred to do research on male animals is because of the inherent gender based differences- the monthly cycles and hormonal fluctuations were inconvenient to researchers. According to Anne Marie Owens, who wrote this story about a Leonard Sax speech in a National Post story in 2003, Sax says it's a:

male response to stress, the decades-old ''fight or flight'' principle, which
shows an increased heart rate, increased blood flow to the brain and a boost in alertness that collectively triggers a desire to fight or run away.

However, the female response to stress is completely different, and prompts instead a decreased heart rate and blood flow to the brain, dizziness, nausea -- all of it triggering a desire to hug and be hugged, he said.

''Most boys will experience confrontation as arousing and exciting -- they enjoy it. Girls, however,
experience nausea and dizziness; they are not that interested in being under fire,'' said Dr. Sax.

Boys also do much, much better in school if they do NOT have to sit in their chairs. In classrooms where chairs are optional, most boys prefer to stand at their desks to do their work.


abstract concepts
- Boys tend to  have more trouble with this, especially when it comes to emotions and putting themselves in somebody else's shoes. It's not nearly as effective to ask a little boy, "How would it make you feel if somebody did that to you?"  as it is to ask a little girl this same question.  The boys may learn to give the right answers, but they really don't process information that way for many years past when girls can do it. What is more effective, my smart married daughter the Equuschick has told me,  is coming up with a similar instance when they have been on the receiving end, asking them to remember when that happened, and then point out that how they felt then is how so and so feels now.

Boys also learn better, are more alert and engaged when the room temperature is about 68 degrees, give or take.  For girls, the optimal temp for learning is about six degrees warmer.   Shasta says he still remembers, back when we used to babysit him, his then future wife would curl up under blankets with a book- sitting on top of a heating vent or near the wood stove, and he would think, "WHO would do that?  How could you possibly stay awake when you're that hot?"  Turns out the answer is (generally speaking), girls.

Fascinating stuff.

So now, when teaching my son, I will make him stand in front of the freezer while I do jumping jacks and talk very loudly, throwing hard things at him, and when teaching the girls,  we will curl up under the blankets, speak very softly, and eating chocolate.

Okay, not really.  But it does explain why all of us are under the blankets all winter long while my son is running around the 65-68 degree house barefoot and in shirtsleeves.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't forget to tune this Thursday when  four moms of many (seven Progeny or more)- Connie at Smockity Frocks., KimC  at Life in a Shoe: the methods and madness of one family of 12 ,Kimberly at Raising Olives , and me, your friendly DHM right here in The Common Room, will be live-blogging our entire day!
Pin It

30 comments:

  1. Thank you for posting this. I hope to be able to go look at the links later tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Fascinating!! Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Smockity Frocks3/23/2010 10:06:00 PM

    Very interesting! I've always had a sneaking suspicion that if my son were in a traditional school setting he would be diagnosed with ADHD and possibly "learning disabilities". He is very smart, but not good at sitting at a desk and learning quietly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think a lot of us homeschoolers suspected that if our sons were in public school they would be "labeled". But we knew they were very intelligent.
    My daughter had one young piano student (male) who would stand next to the piano while receiving instruction, he only sat when he actually played the piano. He could listen better that way. (btw, that is an advantage to having a teacher who was homeschooled--they are very accepting of "differences".)
    Fun post. Boys and girls are different and it is helpful to know that before one marries the other!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Regarding:

    Video games -- It's typical, unimaginative & trite to blame "video games," without presenting any particular evidence. They are at least better than television since they are active and interactive, rather than passive. Also ignored is that these games provide an outlet to express the competitive/combative nature of males.

    Being taught to read too early -- uh, no.

    Single-sex classrooms -- If being grouped in some regimented institutional setting with a bunch of people with whom you have nothing in common but age is unnatural and unlike anything in the real world, segregating by sex is even more so.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just loved this comment: "I finally gave up and now we just wash everything together. He may have pink underwear, but since he can't tell the difference between pink and white, it doesn't matter." we don't sort either. As a mom of 4 boys, the least of my laundry concerns is a little extra red or blue in fabric.

    I wonder if the way both deal with pain isn't also as an aid to woman to give birth. If we had a fight or flight instinct with the pain, the baby would never come out, but the more we can calm and shutdown the smoother things go. Another reason I love female homebirth midwives.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mr Pudewa also suggested that pain brought everything into sharp focus, clearly remembered, most of us would never have a second child.=)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Have you read Dr. Sax's works? If you had, you'd not be making the entirely unsourced, baseless allegation that no evidence was presented. LIkewise on your other comments, which are surprisingly uninformed for you.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When I taught public school I was always flexible about how my kids arranged themselves in my classroom. I was fine with kids standing up or lying down as long as they were on task, I could see them, and they weren't interfering with someone else. I often had boys who would stand, but I don't think I ever had a girl who wanted to stand up instead of sit down. During lectures, I would sometimes have boys that stood along the back of the room, taking a few notes while leaning over a desk. The girls all sat neatly in their desks and scribbled furiously.

    When I taught jr. high, the hot book among teachers was "Reviving Ophelia" about how girls are in crisis. I thought it was stuff and nonsense except for the oversexualization part, but most teachers believed it. And yet, that junior high had more boys medicated for ADD or ADHD than at any school I have ever worked. If he is right about how those medications affect boys, we are in big, big trouble as a society.

    ReplyDelete
  10. No, other than a portion of the PDF you linked, which didn't really touch on some of those topics at all.

    ReplyDelete
  11. So, in other words, you have absolutely no idea if Dr. Sax was being 'typical, unimaginative, or trite' and blaming video games without any evidence at all. You just decided, perhaps because you like video games, that anybody who objects to them does so without evidence, no evidence required to reach that conclusion.

    ReplyDelete
  12. From a female teacher of boys, thought-provoking material!

    I teach in a single sex school, and one of the things which I find fascinating is that the boys are less inhibited in certain types of behaviour and seem more willing to be themselves and to show a large variance in their behaviour, rather than being defined by the presence of girls. This is similar to my own experience in a girls' single sex school.

    There isn't the sense that there are "girls' subjects" or "boys' subjects". You don't have to run around playing football if you don't want to (although plenty do). You can sit and read in the library (and plenty do). Some make beautiful neat, colour- coded notes. Some scribble off a few quick words at the last minute. Some fidget and wriggle and dash off as soon as the bell goes. Some sit very firmly and quietly on their own. Some work steadily all the way through, some cram just before exams.

    I love teaching boys - partly, I suspect, because I have a very male brain (as Sacha Baron-Cohen puts in) & definitely approach things in a logical/systems based way.

    One of the most important things about teaching for me is that I am teaching *those particular children*. Being taught as a stereotypical girl would have done me no good at all - I did much better with competition, argumentative debate, playing with things, visualising. And in the same way, I need to be aware of what children need as individuals, not just as a member of a specific gender.

    I do think there are broad generalisations that can be made, but these do affect the individuals who don't conform. What would be ideal would be to have different classes and then you could choose where to go - so half might be predominantly male & the other female but the individuals who don't fit the "in general..." are still catered for.

    Totally agree on not medicalising children - although I think that occurs less in the UK.

    Sorry, I seem to have written an essay there! Thanks for the thinking space :-)

    ReplyDelete
  13. I love what you wrote! Dr. Sax (and Mr. Pudewa), both say that there is NO difference in what boys and girls can learn. The differences are, in general, *how* they learn, and in some cases, at what pace.

    Dr Sax also talks a lot about how both sexes benefit from single sex education by that very sense of no gender specific topics. He met a school band teacher who worked at a school that split into two gender based schools after decades as co-ed. The band director said in all the years he'd worked in the co-ed school, he'd never had a boy try out for the flute, and he'd never had girl try the trumpet, but as soon as they switched to single sex, he had girls trying the trumpet and boys trying the flute, and he found that a couple of his girls in particular who had been indifferent flute players were amazing at the trumpet, and the same for the boys.
    So Dr. Sax went and looked up biographies of the two most famous flute players of our time, James Galway and another man (sorry, I forget his name). He found that both of them had attended all male schools.

    Another generalization he's made is that school in the lower years works much better for girls, but high school tends to be harder on them.

    I also found this information most helpful for explaining what I was already observing- my son enjoying a level of play involving kicking that none of the girls did, the antipathy he has for sleeves in the winter, the distractability of my sixth daughter, the utter confusion that a color separated laundry basket seems to cause for my husband, the trouble my son had with sitting Both of my sons in law are more aware of color than either of their wives, but my husband... well, it just stuns me that he's never been diagnosed as color blind.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I love what you wrote! Dr. Sax (and Mr. Pudewa), both say that there is NO difference in what boys and girls can learn. The differences are, in general, *how* they learn, and in some cases, at what pace.

    Dr Sax also talks a lot about how both sexes benefit from single sex education by that very sense of no gender specific topics. He met a school band teacher who worked at a school that split into two gender based schools after decades as co-ed. The band director said in all the years he'd worked in the co-ed school, he'd never had a boy try out for the flute, and he'd never had girl try the trumpet, but as soon as they switched to single sex, he had girls trying the trumpet and boys trying the flute, and he found that a couple of his girls in particular who had been indifferent flute players were amazing at the trumpet, and the same for the boys.
    So Dr. Sax went and looked up biographies of the two most famous flute players of our time, James Galway and another man (sorry, I forget his name). He found that both of them had attended all male schools.

    Another generalization he's made is that school in the lower years works much better for girls, but high school tends to be harder on them.

    I also found this information most helpful for explaining what I was already observing- my son enjoying a level of play involving kicking that none of the girls did, the antipathy he has for sleeves in the winter, the distractability of my sixth daughter, the utter confusion that a color separated laundry basket seems to cause for my husband, the trouble my son had with sitting Both of my sons in law are more aware of color than either of their wives, but my husband... well, it just stuns me that he's never been diagnosed as color blind.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You are 100% correct that I have no idea whether Dr. Sax presents evidence or not, which is why I never even mentioned his name. I said "it's typical, unimaginative & trite to blame 'video games," without presenting any particular evidence," and indeed, it is. The CBC article certainly never mentions any evidence. I don't doubt that Sax makes some case for it in his book, assuming the article is an accurate representation of his views.

    I'd like to see you support any portion of your second sentence, using quotes from my replies.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The CBC article to which you take issue, Timothy, is a summary of Dr. Sax's points, which is why it is his works that at least one of us is talking about.
    You may have noted the use of the word 'perhaps.' in my sentence, which is widely understood to remove a statement from the category of naked assertion.

    Seriously, this is silly. You didn't check the link, you didn't even realize that the one article you read in part and objected to was actually entirely about Dr. Sax's work and the bit you object to is a summary of it, and this failure or due diligence is very unlike you. I don't know why your chain has been yanked, but I am not interested in arguing about it further.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I found Sax's 1st book about 5 years ago. I have bought several copies to giveaway!!!! His work is phenomenal! Thanks for posting.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oh! I bet this explains why my two guys (one adult, one 14) can look in a fridge or cabinet for something and declare up and down that it's not there, when, lo and behold, there it is. Sigh....

    ReplyDelete
  19. I think that most of the ideas in this post are great, really I do. But I hate the idea of only single sex schools. I've been to a single sex (girl) school. I would rather go to a boys' school. Girls' schools, in my admittedly limited experience, are crabby, drama-filled, nasty, back stabbing places. I would also hate to miss out on the interaction with boys that you would get at a mixed sex school. Some of my best friends are male.

    I support the idea of single sex schools, but only as an option. Some people can handle that level of drama. I can't. I think a classroom like Laura's sounds much better to me--one where the students can stand up or whatever they need to do.

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks for posting this. I'll have to look into his books. I'm a mom of 4 boys, and they do confuse me at times. I really like the information about them not being able to find things that aren't moving. One of my sons and my husband are particularly bad at that. In my husband's case, he actually is color-blind, yet I continue to tell him what color things are. I don't know when I'll learn. Of course, he forgets that he doesn't know his colors, too. Early in our marriage, I heard a timer go off and asked him to go see if the muffins were golden-brown and ready to come out of the oven. He went into the kitchen, opened the oven door, and then called out, "I don't know what golden-brown looks like!"

    ReplyDelete
  21. Katie this was my exact thought as I read that portion, a woman's reaction to pain is perfect for childbirth!

    God is good!

    ReplyDelete
  22. Thank you, thank you, thank you for doing all this work and putting it out there.

    Single sex classrooms, yes. Why is that so uncommon in today's society?

    Again, thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  23. I have three boys that I homeschool. I know ~ very unusual ~ a homeschooling dad. We are in a position that I can do that, though. Anyway, this was a very interesting article, one that I am going to bookmark and read over again in order to digest more. One thing that I will give a hearty AMEN to is the video games. We, unfortunately, allowed my sis-in-law to give an unused game system to the boys last summer. I guess I could blame it on her, but really it is my fault for not putting my foot down earlier. They play entirely too much on that thing, and it has to be curtailed! I may comment more after I've read it again. Thanks, again, for putting it together.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Unusual, but very cool. I know at least one other homeschooling dad, and my husband does math with your youngest, as well as some specialized job training stuff. Involved Dads are so important!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Great post and article! I feel bad now--I am always trying to make it warm and quiet, slow and snuggly in our schoolroom. No wonder my son balks sometimes! Thank you--I have forwarded this to all the boys and Moms I know:)

    ReplyDelete
  26. Thank you so much for the insight. Lots to think about as I begin to teach my daughter next year along with my son this year.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Great post. I wanted to comment some more on endocrine disruptors and point out that (non-fermented) soy is also a big one.

    http://www.mercola.com/article/soy/index.htm

    ReplyDelete
  28. Personally, I homeschool my children. But with nieces & nephews in public schools, I think a great way to handle the "same sex classroom" but still allowing for socialization between male & female students is to have co-ed public schools with class schedules arranged so each classroom contains only boys or only girls during that class period. Then they can socialize on the playground, during lunch break, on the bus, etc.

    With my HSed children, I do find that our girls want to curl up on the couch or overstuffed chair with a blanket & their assignments in silence. Our boys are constantly having to be "cattle prodded" back to their schoolwork b/c there's not enough activity going on in the room they study in and they want music on usually (thus the reason I have them separated in different rooms to begin with).

    ReplyDelete
  29. Very interesting food for thought! I linked on my weekly roundup, post is under my name. Thanks for sharing!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Here via Nettacow. We have one little boy (20 months) and are expecting a baby in June (gender unknown at this point). I really see differences in how my son approaches things already and will be referencing this as he gets older. I often find myself having to adjust to how he (and his daddy) hear me speak compared to how my sisters and I or my mom and I speak to each other. Fascinating stuff!

    ReplyDelete

Tell me what you think. I can take it.=)