We have seven children. Many people think that means I'm an expert about the right thing to do with any child. I tell them that I have seven individual children. God gave me no clones. Sometimes the same approach won't even work consistently with the same child, let alone all seven of them. Every time we've added a child to our family it's been an entirely new and different experience. This means that sometimes I still need to ask for advice from somebody else, just like I did with the first child (although admittedly not quite so often as I did with the first child).
So when our sixth child started biting me while she was nursing and then laughing uproariously, I called the local La Leche League leader in our town and asked if she had any suggestions (putting the baby down and walking away was almost impossible for me to do; it hurt so much, and it didn't work with her anyway).
You should know that our sixth baby was a _much_ prayed for child. There is a six year gap between her and the next child. During that six year gap I had one miscarriage which took me almost four years to recover from emotionally. I had approximately 40 menstrual cycles come and go, every single one of which was greeted with tears as I learned, yet again, that I still had not conceived. I learned later that four of our five children were praying for us to have another baby (the one of the five might have been, but she's nonverbal, so I wouldn't know). In fact, some of them were praying for twins. I wrote about this locust plague of grief and discontent here yesterday.
So, this baby, this sixth child, was born into a home full of hearts to adore her, arms to hold her and lips to kiss her. The only time she ever touched the floor or left our loving arms is when she insisted on it. Otherwise, I held her, or, they could pry her from my arms, her big sisters held her. More than one person told me that they had never seen a mother have so much fun and joy with a baby (although people who had known me with my other babies were able to tell them that I'd been the same way with the older children). Everyone of her siblings was nuts about her- the only sibling rivalry was the fight to hold the baby.
Now we will return to our story about the stage when this delightful baby was nine months old and discovered that when she bit while nursing, Mummy made the most incredible noises and faces, and it was the funniest thing this baby thought she had ever seen in her life.
As I said, I called the LLL leader in town to ask for suggestions. She asked how many children I have, and her first (and subsequently only)idea was, "Wow. Does your baby, like, ever get held? She probably just wants attention."
I explain cheerfully that this baby is never lacking for attention, gets more love and affection than any other baby I've seen except her older sisters, that I hold her, dance with her, cuddle with her, snuggle with her, co-sleep with her, and that if for any reason I ever stop, one of her siblings jumps in.
And Ms. Yuppy LLLLeader says, "Yeah, but, like, six is so many. Are you sure she's getting enough attention?"
"Yes," I repeat, a little less cheerfully. Indeed, I do not know how that child could possibly have had more attention than she was getting. And I pointed out that her next sibling up is six years old, and say again how precious this child is to all of us and she says something like, "Well, gee, I don't know. I don't see how you have time to hold her. If it's not just a need for extra attention I can't think what it would be. I'm sure she's not doing it to be mean, though."
I know that. I never suggested she was. I realized that a 9 month old cannot really put herself in another person's place and could not know that what amuses her hurts me. I know that small children see everything from their own point of view; if they are hurt, they think you are. If they are tickled to death, they are sure you can see the joke, too.
But I hung up the phone with the feeling that this woman was utterly convinced that:
a. my baby was not ever held except when bfing (so why would she bite, thus ending the session if she had this unsatisfied need for extra attention?) and
b. I was an idiot for having six children, and
c. I probably did think my 9 month old was maliciously biting me to be mean. After all, from her tone it was obvious she thought only women with the I.Q. of a bowl of yogurt would have six kids.
We did figure out a solution to the biting thing without Ms. Yuppy's help- realizing the baby did not know that biting hurt, I watched her very carefully when we nursed, holding her hand in mine- as soon as she got that gleam in her eye, I quickly put her arm between us. She chomped down on her own arm and realized that this biting human flesh thing wasn't quite as pleasant an experience as she'd previously thought.
Oddly enough, in spite of being held all the time, our little honey baby learned to walk one week before her nine month birthday, and she learned to run about two weeks later. She is the First Year Girl, and she continues to provide light, laughter, and drama in all of our lives. We tell people that God made us wait so long to get her because he knew it would take this many people in the house every day to keep her from killing herself, and we steal another line from a friend of ours and say that when God breathed the breath of life into this one, he breathed just a little too hard. But we wouldn't have her any other way.
Thank you for sharing that. Lord willing, if we are blessed with a family as large or nearly so large (we hope so), I'm anticipating all of the interesting reactions.
ReplyDeleteI had thought LLL was a little more positive about that kind of thing, but I suppose I'm not surprised.
It does interest me how with some sources, the solution to everything for a baby is more attention. Even when you ask for a solution to the fact that there are only two people in the house to care for the child, the solution is more attention.
What an odd LLL response! I guess that, just because someone is a LLL leader, that doesn't mean they know a lot about parenting.
ReplyDeletejdavidb is right. Liberal child-care people these days have a litany - a very short list of stock responses to absolutely everything. "Child needs more attention," "Child has self-esteem issues," "Parents need to be more involved," etc. If one of their half-dozen or so answers doesn't fit they are completely lost but they still must pretend that they are the authority.
ReplyDeleteOh well, the LLLLeader was a young mother, and she probably kept her house much cleaner than I do mine, and with just two small children and no big helpers, she couldn't imagine the ways in which my life was different from hers. It's amazing how much time one has for holding babies when one does not care if the dusting has been done.
ReplyDeleteHer house may have been a lot cleaner ... but I bet her kids didn't come out of their upbringing with a very good work ethic.
ReplyDeleteIt's amazing how much time one has for holding babies when one does not care if the dusting has been done.
Yes! Yes! Yes!
Firefly, I think you are exactly right. LLL and some accompanying philosophies are a religion to some people, though we certainly don't discount the good information they provide.
Lynn, I'm lol at that. :) I didn't actually have "liberal parenting" in mind with my comment, but the shoe fits very well, and they should wear it!
What I had in mind was sort of what I call "militant attachment parenting." I'm a big fan of about 50%-90% of attachment parenting philosophies, though some of them are just not for us (and some of them are just not for anybody!). But some of these people get very militant, and they are out there telling everybody it has to be done their way, and since there are many more situations out there than they are prepared to deal with they are offering very simplistic answers to what can be complex problems. There's really just a few mantras they repeat over and over again.
When Joseph was about seven days old I was looking in Dr. Sears' Baby Book ($1 on clearance at Half Price Books!) and his main solution seemed to be to wear the baby in a sling. I have no doubt that helps, but surely there's more to it than that! Plus (don't flame me for this) slings aren't for everybody. WE have a sling, and we like it, but slings aren't for everybody.
Even breastfeeding is not for everybody.
DAvid, it's true that breastfeeding is not for everybody. Fathers, for instance, are not equipped by God to feed their babies by breastmilk.
ReplyDeleteOtherwise, last time I checked, God designed the baby to be the perfect milk extractor and breastmilk to be the perfect food for babies. Scientists are still finding out about all the things that breastfeeding does for babies that artificial baby milk doesn't. Makes sense, since one of them is part of God's original design, and one is a development of the last century.
Yes, it's true that it's for most people, but it's also true that it's not for everybody.
ReplyDeleteThe reason I posted this, besides the joy I take in inviting commentary, is part of our ongoing campaign to remind the world that people don't have a right to walk up to complete strangers and inquire and offer criticism about how they feed their children. A very young mother we know at church recently had to have both breasts removed. She shouldn't have to face a world where she is made to feel guilty about not breastfeeding. (Or a world where she should have to let everybody know what she went through in order to get a pass from public scrutiny.)
Nobody I know argues that breastfeeding is not best any more. Even the formula companies are required by law to say so. The world where a breastfeeding mother is an anomaly is mostly gone, unless you're Barbara Walters. Nowadays, it's the non-breastfeeding mothers who get persecuted.
Funny that I said "the joy I take in inviting commentary." I meant "the joy I take in inviting controversy." But, of course, I tend to enjoy both. :)
ReplyDeleteIt's the formula feeders who get persecuted? When was the last time a bottle feeding mama was asked to go feed her baby in a toilet stall? When was the last time a bottle feeding mama was told that feeding her baby a bottle in public was akin to urinating in public? Do they make little rooms at the back of the church building with poor air and sometimes no sound where bottle feeders are supposed to retreat to feed their babies?
ReplyDeleteI think we differ in what we would define as 'persecution' here. Being argued with is not persecution. Being told to go feed your baby in the bathroom because breastfeeding is disgusting is.
I am sorry about the lady at church who had both breasts removed, but nobody has the power to make her feel guilty without her complicity. She knows she can't breastfeed, that she has not deliberately made a decision to give her baby a food that is inferior to breastmilk.
This is like saying that somebody with no legs should not have to face a world where she is made to feel guilty for not walking, so nobody should publicly tout the value of walking daily.
Lots of people actually do still doubt the superiority of breastmilk, and plenty of people who give lip service to the notion that yeah, sure, it's better, still do not grasp just how much better. New information is still coming out, and I think it's exciting and fascinating stuff.
It's not just the content of the milk itself (which has incredible properties, of course), it's the whole delivery system -breastfeeding develops muscles in the tongue, lips, jaw, and throat necessary for speech and other tasks in ways that bottle feeding doesn't- I learn something new about it every single year. The very structure of the cell walls of the breast, designed to prevent certain molecules from slipping through (mostly the molecules in medications are too large to even pass through the wall which God designed, they don't get in the milk at all- but doctors don't even know this and will tell patients otherwise).
People will say that sure, breastfeeding is best, but artificial baby milk is okay- but the difference between the two is much greater than most people assume. The reaction of too many bottle feeders when hearing about just how tremendous that difference is is to call it persecution, get defensive, and to prefer that those promoting breastmilk just shut up about it, or dilute the message with an obligatory disclaimer- 'Breastmilk does a thousand things formula can't do, is designed by God and formula isn't, has marvelous properties that we are still discovering- but it's okay if you prefer to use formula instead.'
I do not understand this method of dealing with guilt, myself. One of our children ws very ill as a child, and for a number of reasons, we switched to formula. I thought I was making the best decision I could at the time, but I've learned some things since then that made my 'best decision' one based on less than complete information. Personally, I do feel very guilty about that, but my response is not to wish that nobody would talk about the problems with formula because that reminds me of my regrets- it's rather to do what I wish somebody had done for me, and do what I can to make sure that the vast superiority of breastmilk over formula is very, very clear, and to make it clear also that only about 3 percent of the population truly cannot nurse. Just about every so called hinderance has a solution. It matters to me because breastfeeding is not just a little better- there's not time or space enough to blog about all the ways it is better.
Education and information are not persecution- even when they are presented more Zealously than one might prefer.