The Real Reason for Early Vaccinations? Parent Training

I know that they do this with tetanus- if you take a kid in with a cut, a kid who may or may not be up to date on their tetanus shots, the doctor will want to make you sure the kid gets his tetanus shot- but what they will not tell you (and will only reluctantly admit if you ask point blank), is that this is of no value for the wound which is the reason you brought the kid to the doctor for in the first place.
I have no particular objections to the tetanus shot itself, but I do object to the other stuff they bundle up with, and I resent not being given a choice as to which toxins I have injected into my child.
But it’s worse than that.  That combination of some 20 different shots you are supposed to get into your kid’s system before he is one- they are even more useless than that tetanus shot.  REally.
See here:

the 24 recommended vaccines given in the first year of life can have no possible benefit, as infants cannot produce antibodies until about age one. I had made this statement in my morning presentation. At the panel Q & A that afternoon, a doctor came to the microphone to ask this highly-respected immunologist if what I had said was true. Here is the transcript and audio clip of this brief but remarkable exchange:
Immunologist: “So, in terms of the vaccines that are given at two months, four months and six months, right…”
Participant: “…there’s no protection.”
Immunologist: “There’s no protection from those vaccines. No. I’m sorry I missed the earlier talk, but there’s no real protection from the two months, four months and six months.”

So what’s the point, you want to know?  Besides putting money in everybody’s pockets but yours, it’s training.

Q. So the science seems fairly clear that for the first year of life, probably, that the immunization is not stimulating the kind of response we expect it to stimulate.
A. True.
Q. So what’s the rationale for continuing to do that if it’s not doing what it’s supposed to be [doing]?
A. The vaccines are given at pediatric wellness visits, and the idea is that you are training the parent to bring their child in at all the pediatric wellness visits, and that it’s only the year visit that actually is truly important. But that for most parents you are not going to get them to bring their kid in if they don’t come in at two months, four months, and six months. And so it’s actually more of a training thing.
It’s interesting, I was on the phone with [?] county public health last week, with one of their vaccine nurses. She was like, ‘Oh, you’re talking about vaccines? Make sure you tell them they have to do that year shot because the first three [the 2, 4 and 6 month shots] don’t work.’ I was like, ‘Yeah, I know.’ [laughter].
Now, the person speaking here is not some kid with a blog. This is an impeccably-credentialed, pro-vaccine PhD immunologist. She knows more about the detailed intracies of human immunology than I ever will. I have great respect for her, and her decades of dedicated work in this field. And I was so glad I was sitting right next to her as she confirmed what I and others have been saying for years.

The medical profession is training you poor dumb parents.  And it works, too- don’t we all just trust the experts?  Isn’t “My doctor said….” one of the most authoritative statements somebody can make in an argument?  Well, unless somebody is saying that to me, because, cynic that I am, the words “My doctor said….” start off all kinds of alarm bells and whistles and make me more suspicious, not less.